Talk:Avatarism
From sciforums_encyclopedia
Wiki probably doesn't have a comparable article on this. I can't be bothered checking to affirm my essential correctness on this matter. redarmy11 12:31, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- they don't even have an article on sciforums. heheh Spuriousmonkey 12:34, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- Then your assertion that this article is 'better than Wikipedia' is either disingenuous (if you mean to imply that it is 'better' than Wikipedia's nonexistent treatment of the subject) or idiotic (if you mean to imply that the article is better than Wikipedia's entire content) - no? redarmy11 12:55, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- I don't know. I never finished high school. Spuriousmonkey 12:57, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- Aye, fair do's. redarmy11 12:58, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- oy, want to do my sister for a tenner?
- Dunno - does she have any immediately noticeable genetic defects? redarmy11 13:05, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- only a few dozen. Spuriousmonkey 15:12, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- Dunno - does she have any immediately noticeable genetic defects? redarmy11 13:05, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- oy, want to do my sister for a tenner?
- Aye, fair do's. redarmy11 12:58, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- I don't know. I never finished high school. Spuriousmonkey 12:57, 8 March 2007 (EST)
- Then your assertion that this article is 'better than Wikipedia' is either disingenuous (if you mean to imply that it is 'better' than Wikipedia's nonexistent treatment of the subject) or idiotic (if you mean to imply that the article is better than Wikipedia's entire content) - no? redarmy11 12:55, 8 March 2007 (EST)
