thecollage
06-26-05, 10:01 PM
i think whoever is running this operation should start adding some color to the site. i also think that whoever is running this site should add some neat pictures.
anyone?
anyone?
|
|
View Full Version : changes to sciforums thecollage 06-26-05, 10:01 PM i think whoever is running this operation should start adding some color to the site. i also think that whoever is running this site should add some neat pictures. anyone? James R 06-26-05, 10:14 PM The owner has made a conscious choice to make this a discussion site, and to save bandwidth by getting rid of unnecessary frills. That's why Avatars here are small, signatures are not enabled, and you won't see threads full of pretty pictures. What you get instead is, hopefully, some good discussion without annoying distractions. Satyr 06-26-05, 10:59 PM The best change that can be made to sciforums is for those trolling morons who only come here to mock the insignificant rabble about how dumb they are, to be banned permanently. If this does not happen this Forum will tumble into a state of innocuous discussions going in circles by mind desperately needing a place to hang out. cato 06-26-05, 11:05 PM what would sciforums have left if we got rid of the intellectuals? you? HAHA, BURN! just kidding, I have nothing against you. Satyr 06-26-05, 11:06 PM Are you an intel....lectual? Whatever that means? You are a Paki with an attitude. thecollage 06-28-05, 12:35 PM screw the bandwidth. i want something aesthetically pleasing. cato 06-28-05, 01:01 PM then go to a porn site. Dreamwalker 06-28-05, 01:05 PM I think it is quite aesthetically pleasing the way it is. If you do not like it...well, I do not think you will be hold back if you want to leave. jlocke 06-28-05, 03:12 PM There's section where this type of thread belongs, it's called the Site Feedback section. SkinWalker 07-17-05, 11:03 AM The owner has made a conscious choice to make this a discussion site, and to save bandwidth by getting rid of unnecessary frills. You mean unnecessary frills like actually using the bandwidth? I'd say Dave has saved a lot of bandwidth the last few weeks. TruthSeeker 07-17-05, 08:46 PM The owner has made a conscious choice to make this a discussion site, and to save bandwidth by getting rid of unnecessary frills. That's why Avatars here are small, signatures are not enabled, and you won't see threads full of pretty pictures. What you get instead is, hopefully, some good discussion without annoying distractions. Rarely... Actually, it IS possible to find good discussions here... However, we often have to filter out all the garbage left by flamers... :rolleyes: TruthSeeker 07-17-05, 08:47 PM screw the bandwidth. i want something aesthetically pleasing. Maybe that's the problem with moder society... Too focused on superficial appearance to care about the content... :rolleyes: |