Olny srmat poelpe can raed tihs.
I cdnuolt blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The phaonmneal pweor of the hmuan mnid, aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amzanig huh? yaeh and I awlyas tghuhot slpeling was ipmorantt! if you can raed tihs psas it on !!

Taht's old nwes.

This repost is the modern day equivalent of "Kilroy was here"

wehn eylmnopig eplaolxiecty ltgnhey and otseriwhee vsbreoe snceeets, the aooeemrintfend peeomnnohn deos not rlaley wrok

I'm sorry, what now ?
Was that,
When employing ..... ............. and otherwise verbose..... the aforementioned phenomenon does not really work ?

D'oh! I left out the 'n' in "exceptionally" and "sentences" and had an extra 'o' somewhere.

...exceptionally lengthy and otherwise verbose sentences

The point is it's not quite as simple as that "study" makes it out to be.

-=-

It doesn't work well with everyone.

I can read it, too easily

wehn eylmnopig eplaolxiecty ltgnhey and otseriwhee vsbreoe snceeets, the aooeemrintfend peeomnnohn deos not rlaley wrok

fcuk otah, taht was way hrdear