hey All

i reckon we should ask TOR to come back she is:

1) Intelegent
2) inetresting
3) a nice girl
4) nice boobs
5) and a high IQ

what do you think

hey All

i reckon we should ask TOR to come back she is:

1) Intelegent
2) inetresting

what do you think

I think you need to check your spelling :rolleyes:

I think you need to check your spelling :rolleyes:

eeerr cheers shorty, i think it is my skills on the keyboard which lets me down and i dont bother checkin..... Also a spell check would be good.

Thanks for the heads up though

~~~~~~~
take it ez
zak

hey All

i reckon we should ask TOR to come back she is:

1) Intelegent
2) inetresting
3) a nice girl
4) nice boobs
5) and a high IQ

what do you think

sure.

I recall seeing your profile on her blog—family picture and stuff.

Bring her back, as a supermoderator.

I recall seeing your profile on her blog—family picture and stuff.


what do you like the pic then chewing gum???

yeah she is nice is TOR Always very pleasant and a top girl...... apart from when she told me i was a Puppet of Baron Von maximus or Muslims Sock puppet

~~~~~~
cheers
zak

Bring her back, as a supermoderator.

make her a mod of the mods!

make her a mod of the mods!

hey Moneky

pls cast your vote man

This must be the season for bringing people back.

I vote we un-ban "debttconsolidation". I think he had a lot of interesting things to say......and I really miss him. He was so nice. Always there to lend a helpful piece of advice.

She was awful. She merely said she had an IQ of 150... but did she ever actually exhibit intelligence?

She was fun and she offered fresh perspective on many issues, unlike you boring old perverts and drooling teens (everyone who is saying bad things about her). :bugeye:

And she misses us /sends flying kiss to ToR/ :bawl:

Isn't she too busy reporting the daily news that happens here anyway? I visited her blog once because there was a link here to it.
I see I made her top 10 news reports a few times.....She likes to add her own twist to it all.

I think it is actually pretty sad that she would report the goings on here. It isn't that interesting to read twice.

Heh, anyone who comes back after a break and wants to know whats going on should read her news.

Its interesting and a great way to catch up with the gossip

Do not question ways of Gods/Mods or they shall punish you.

I don't really understand her ongoing obsession with sciforums. Obviously, even though she is no longer here, the goings-on on sciforums take up quite a bit of her attention.

I feel a bit sorry for her, actually.

Of course, her blog is chock full of errors of fact, and has historically been quite vindictive. She seems to have mellowed somewhat in recent times, but I'm not convinced that if she came back she wouldn't just take up her self-appointed fight against myself and other moderators/admins from where she left off.

To TOR, if you read this (I'm sure you will): if you do wish to swallow your pride and return to sciforums, I suggest you post on your blog what you would hope to contribute. And perhaps an apology for all the false things you've written there would also be nice.

Or, you could just continue to post about what an egomaniac unfair bastard I am, as usual.

Best wishes. :)

Or, you could just continue to post about what an egomaniac unfair bastard I am, as usual.

Best wishes. :)

No James R. you are the rays of the sun reflecting of the moon at night, guiding us through the dark alleys of life and keeping us in track. That which you choose to reveal to us, the path you choose to light before us, there we shall follow...for we are blind sheep amongst the vast limitless fields. Shepherd! hear us pray to the singing star above us, those sheep who you choose to perish have done wrong to you and so have done wrong to us.

No James R. you are the rays of the sun reflecting of the moon at night, guiding us through the dark alleys of life and keeping us in track. That which you choose to reveal to us, the path you choose to light before us, there we shall follow...for we are blind sheep amongst the vast limitless fields. Shepherd! hear us pray to the singing star above us, those sheep who you choose to perish have done wrong to you and so have done wrong to us.
Couldn' t you have just called him a gimp and been done with it ?

Couldn' t you have just called him a gimp and been done with it ?

quick definitions cannot express the reality, to the full extent, which we are accustomed to.

Or, you could just continue to post about what an egomaniac unfair bastard I am, as usual.

Best wishes. :)


:confused:

I haven't read this on her blog?

edit: I cant find it either?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=lpT&q=site%3Asciforums.blogspot.com+JamesR&btnG=Search

quick definitions cannot express the reality, to the full extent, which we are accustomed to.
Sure they do. Convoluted elaboration is just that three pound tumor in our heads trying to justify it's insidious existence.

hey All

i reckon we should ask TOR to come back she is:

1) Intelegent
2) inetresting
3) a nice girl
4) nice boobs
5) and a high IQ

what do you think
I hate when people get banned. The site loses a unique viewpoint whenever someone is banned. Bring 'em all back, I say. Especially the ones with nice boobs!

Sure they do. Convoluted elaboration is just that three pound tumor in our heads trying to justify it's insidious existence.

to some it is a tumor to others it is a flower that grows from the seeds of wisdom.

I hate when people get banned. The site loses a unique viewpoint whenever someone is banned. Bring 'em all back, I say. Especially the ones with nice boobs!
Tell me about it !

I mean -

TOR: unique viewpoint... nice boobs - banned

darkSidZzzzzz: Goddam friggin' retard with both thumbs squarely up friggin' ass - Stuck with the brain-palsied slackwit until he flounces out in a snit

Do we need any more evidence whatever of how fucked up this system of snigger-tranced apparatchiks is ?

I think not.


to some it is a tumor to others it is a flower that grows from the seeds of wisdom.
It didn't grow out of any seeds...

It's an agglomeration of improvisations in response to a series of paradigm-altering disasters, the end result of which is a maladaptation masquerading as the penultimate result of a non-existent process...

It didn't grow out of any seeds...

It's an agglomeration of improvisations in response to a series of paradigm-altering disasters, the end result of which is a maladaptation masquerading as the penultimate result of a non-existent process...

Is that so?

hey All

i reckon we should ask TOR to come back she is:

1) Intelegent
2) inetresting
3) a nice girl
4) nice boobs
5) and a high IQ

what do you think

#4 sticks out...boobs are apparent there...as for the rest, unsure.

Is that so?
Well... no, but it sounds damn good when you say it in a nice stentorian tone while gesturing meaningfully with the stem of your pipe.

Well... no, but it sounds damn good when you say it in a nice stentorian tone while gesturing meaningfully with the stem of your pipe.

what an ascertaining gesture on you part to be so kind to explain to me, the humble thing, the intricate ways of your mind.

what an ascertaining gesture on you part to be so kind to explain to me, the humble thing, the intricate ways of your mind.
I feel that the things which allowed me to achieve enlightenment were electrocuting myself for amusement once while in a drug-induced stupor, and pressing really powerful magnets against my skull as often as I could get my hands on them.

Beyond that - for all I know there could be a hamster running on a little wheel up there...

Or, you could just continue to post about what an egomaniac unfair bastard I am, as usual.

Best wishes.



I haven't read this on her blog?

edit: I cant find it either?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&hs=lpT&q=site%3Asciforums.blogspot.com+JamesR&btnG=Search

He is just delusional as usual. Remember last time when he thought we were going to take over sciforums! LOL!!! :D :wallbang: :xctd:

She was fun and she offered fresh perspective on many issues, unlike you boring old perverts and drooling teens (everyone who is saying bad things about her). :bugeye:

And she misses us /sends flying kiss to ToR/ :bawl:

Hi Sam,

Hows it going?

pls cast this into a vote

Cheers
zak

Hi Sam,

Hows it going?

pls cast this into a vote

Cheers
zak

what a bunch of BS.

what a bunch of BS.

eeerrrr thanks John:bugeye:

not sure what i posted to deserve such a response.

~~~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

eeerrrr thanks John:bugeye:

not sure what i posted to deserve such a response.

~~~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

You didn't deserve that response. I am sure a moderator will take action soon!

eeerrrr thanks John:bugeye:

not sure what i posted to deserve such a response.

~~~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

thats just an expression.

You didn't deserve that response. I am sure a moderator will take action soon!

Hey Monkey

thank you for your support on this issue.

but getting mods involved is not the way forward...however if ol' Johnny Boy can elaborate that would be good...

i want to know what part of my post was a bunch of BS

~~~~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

but getting mods involved is not the way forward...however if ol' Johnny Boy can elaborate that would be good...


I tremble in humility to see the accusation that the influence of our beloved moderators is a negative one and involvement of moderators automatically leads to the degradation of a thread and this forum.

I personally wouldn't have dared to put forward this fact since the forum gestapo is keen on punishing anyone with a brain or the truth.

I admire your brave stance.

I tremble in humility to see the accusation that the influence of our beloved moderators is a negative one and involvement of moderators automatically leads to the degradation of a thread and this forum.

I personally wouldn't have dared to put forward this fact since the forum gestapo is keen on punishing anyone with a brain or the truth.

I admire your brave stance.

hey, what is wrong with you?

thats just an expression.

hey johnny boy

ok but what in my post made you express yourself like that??

~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

I tremble in humility to see the accusation that the influence of our beloved moderators is a negative one and involvement of moderators automatically leads to the degradation of a thread and this forum.

I personally wouldn't have dared to put forward this fact since the forum gestapo is keen on punishing anyone with a brain or the truth.

I admire your brave stance.


eeeerrr ok Monkey, I think i get what you are saying.

Thank you for your support as always though

~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

hey, what is wrong with you?

hey, what is wrong with you!

hey johnny boy

ok but what in my post made you express yourself like that??

~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

why are you calling me johnny boy?

so you really want her back? for what purpose?

why are you calling me johnny boy?

so you really want her back? for what purpose?

do you ever read anything?

see first post
http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1588936&postcount=1

hey, what is wrong with you!

you should just tell me which post pissed you off.

you should just tell me which post pissed you off.

stop trolling.

why are you calling me johnny boy?


I was trying to lighten up the mood, i call one of my best mates Jonny boy, his name is jon, sorry if you felt it in-appropriate

so you really want her back? for what purpose?

Well yeah why not, the posts i read of hers were always quite informative and on a personal level i interacted well with her and she has always tried to offer advice and her thoughts which i beleive are genuine..... All in all i think she is a geunine nice person..

well at least you did not vote no

~~~~~~~~~~

cheers
zak

Well, she was one of the few posters whom I never liked much personally but wanted to—and at times did, on and off. However, her presence I nonetheless appreciated a lot because her stance here was one of being out of the box and hardly an accessory to the popular vote, although she was popular for being herself. In fact, Sciforums needs more eccentric posters like her because the place is quickly getting unbearably stifling.

Originally Posted by Zakariya04
hey All

i reckon we should ask TOR to come back she is:

1) Intelegent
2) inetresting
3) a nice girl
4) nice boobs
5) and a high IQ

what do you think


English accent: "She's got huge... tracks of land!"

What about Ron Harvey? Can he come back?

What about Willy?

English accent: "She's got huge... tracks of land!"

Jesus, you Aussies! it's " 'uge tracts of land"

ya great hairy nosed wombat!

hey All

i reckon we should ask TOR to come back she is:

1) Intelegent
2) inetresting
3) a nice girl
4) nice boobs
5) and a high IQ

what do you think

Not sure what universe you exist, but ToR had none of those attributes. :bugeye:

No please don't

Not sure what universe you exist, but ToR had none of those attributes. :bugeye:

As her primary follower around the forums, surely you jest. :p

As her primary follower around the forums, surely you jest.

Really? The actual chain of events would indicate otherwise. But then, I'm not surprised at your lack of synthesis on the topic, or most others, for that matter.

Why didn't anyone start a thread about me coming back? :D

I have great boobs. :D

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2006/celebdatabase/pamelaanderson/pamela_anderson1_300_400.jpg :xctd:

Later....

Why didn't anyone start a thread about me coming back? :D

I have great boobs. :D

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2006/celebdatabase/pamelaanderson/pamela_anderson1_300_400.jpg :xctd:

Later....

OH JESUS!! not again.

Why didn't anyone start a thread about me coming back? :D

I have great boobs. :D

http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2006/celebdatabase/pamelaanderson/pamela_anderson1_300_400.jpg :xctd:

Later....

alright! did anyone ever tell you that you resemble christie brinkley! She is hot!

Really? The actual chain of events would indicate otherwise. But then, I'm not surprised at your lack of synthesis on the topic, or most others, for that matter.

I recall you even started seeing her in other women, there was an incident of posting the picture of a scantily clad woman with a mighty resemblance to ToR.

Its okay, nn to be embarassed, she is fun AND pretty!:p

I recall you even started seeing her in other women, there was an incident of posting the picture of a scantily clad woman with a mighty resemblance to ToR.

That's another fantasy on your part, one of many you demonstrate here daily.

No please don't

These guys are just sucking up, because they know she reads this daily and reports all that happens here. I think it is all rather quite pathetic as James said. You guys seem facinated with boobs......don't your wives have any?

Btw TOR I am glad I gave you some headlines to report on LOL :crazy:

Dear Shorty,
Nice to see you again too. I've missed you so. Not. :wallbang:

That's another fantasy on your part, one of many you demonstrate here daily.

I recall you also took down the picture pretty quick when you realised how it exposed your deeper emotions; obviously the feelings were too sensitive for public display. :o

...Btw TOR I am glad I gave you some headlines to report on LOL :crazy:

agreed!! Very insightful. Also they were funny as hell...both of them!!
:bravo:

Dear Shorty,
Nice to see you again too. I've missed you so. Not. :wallbang:

SANDY!!!! :xctd:

O!!!!:D:cheers:

I don't really understand her ongoing obsession with sciforums. Obviously, even though she is no longer here, the goings-on on sciforums take up quite a bit of her attention.

I feel a bit sorry for her, actually.

Of course, her blog is chock full of errors of fact, and has historically been quite vindictive. She seems to have mellowed somewhat in recent times, but I'm not convinced that if she came back she wouldn't just take up her self-appointed fight against myself and other moderators/admins from where she left off.

To TOR, if you read this (I'm sure you will): if you do wish to swallow your pride and return to sciforums, I suggest you post on your blog what you would hope to contribute. And perhaps an apology for all the false things you've written there would also be nice.

Or, you could just continue to post about what an egomaniac unfair bastard I am, as usual.

Best wishes. :)

Hey jamesr

i hope all is good

Tor has responded to the above with this


Dear JamesR

In reply to your letter to me HERE

I have this to say.

Now you know the format for complaint, so why so coy? If you believe I have reported false news, be specific, state where I have reported falsley. Note, opinions cannot be shown to be false and where opinion is epxressed that is made explicitly clear. So, if you can demonstrate I have reported falsey, then indeed an apology is in order. But I do not believe that I have. My opinion re your character is mine to have and I make no apology for that any more than I expect you to make apology for your opinion of me.

Meanwhile
I have many blogs and report many things, writing is a pleasure and not an obsession. Were people not reading and enjoying my News here I would stop. As a writer I like to be read, and this James dearest, much to your continued annoyance, is being read. Quite often my topics are brought to my attention by YOUR members. In other words,a request to report the News. Should I deny them that?

This little blog is a groundbreaking first JamesR, a forum communities very own News blog. Now come on, I deserve credit for that little master stroke?

What can I contribute to sciforums, well according to you nothing.

I joined a forum recently with 80,000 members. They have a way of guaging most popular members by readers,fans, viewings etc. Guess who was number 1 after just two weeks? Me. My blog was in the top 5, out of around 200,000. I contribute something James. You know people read me. Controversy, charisma, and as S.A.M. said (thanking you S.A.M.) a little something different.

Would I come back? What would I come back to? You know you're moderation system is out of control James.

Best of luck with all your endeavours.

ToR xxx


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

These guys are just sucking up, because they know she reads this daily and reports all that happens here. I think it is all rather quite pathetic as James said. You guys seem facinated with boobs......don't your wives have any?

Btw TOR I am glad I gave you some headlines to report on LOL :crazy:


Dear Shorty

how are you?

which guys are just sucking up???

please try to be a little less presumptious!

~~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

These guys are just sucking up, because they know she reads this daily and reports all that happens here. I think it is all rather quite pathetic as James said. You guys seem facinated with boobs......don't your wives have any?

Btw TOR I am glad I gave you some headlines to report on LOL :crazy:
Jealous?

Jealous?

hey Nick

you alright mate?

lets give shorty a little time to qualify her statements

Dear Shorty

how are you?

which guys are just sucking up???

please try to be a little less presumptious!

~~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

Jealous?

LMFAO!!! maybe a tad. ;)

LMFAO!!! maybe a tad. ;)


i reckon we shoudl give Shorty the chance to defend her statements...

i reckon we shoudl give Shorty the chance to defend her statements...

agreed, but I don't have your faith in the fact that it will ever happen. Maybe it will be one of those miracle things I hear about. ;)

i reckon we shoudl give Shorty the chance to defend her statements...

And I reckon shes a big green monster.

And I reckon shes a big green monster.

we can live in hope Nick!!

Hey jamesr

i hope all is good

Tor has responded to the above with this


Dear JamesR

In reply to your letter to me HERE

I have this to say.

...

ToR xxx


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cheers
zak

All i have to say is good riddance.

All i have to say is good riddance.

hey john

do you ahve to be so mean!

~~~~~~
take it ez
zak

I hate to stab you in the heart with the truthful stick and watch you bleed in disbelief just when party started. But I have to.

This is not poll about changing forum options, adding new features, rating forum members...

This is much much much more serious thing. Thing that cannot be subject of suggestion polls.

I think I gave that answer before. I could wait until 21st November until poll closes and tell you that then or just ignore whole thing.

But, no I won't. I'll give the answer now.

ToR won't be back. You can open thousands of polls and they all can be affirmative regarding her return, but she still won't be back.

It's not decision that should be based on poll results.

It is a ban. Ban that only admin can lift.

I did that once and regretted.

But not again.