bayesian statistics:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bayesian_probability#Probabilities_of_probabilitie s

if someone pulls out a coin and asks me 'head or tails', even though i know nothing about that particular coin (it might be a two headed coin), i fully expect that if i predict head or tails at random then i have a 50% chance of winning. this is the expectation not the probability that the coin will land one way or the other. i dont know the probability for that particular coin. this is how fuzzy logic works.

belief (as opposed to knowledge) is similar. in fact a bayesian probability is sometimes called 'degree of belief'.

the point being that it is possible to have a belief about something that you know almost nothing about.

To perceive is to take finite data out of an infinite set

it is possible to have a belief about something that you know almost nothing about.

So there really isn't any difference in the cosmology of science versus superstition. Whatever works for you.

the point being that it is possible to have a belief about something that you know almost nothing about.

Of course, many people understand very little about God but believe in it no matter what the facts are.

Yes; attacking a vampire with a wooden steak or a cellulose burger the results could be the same.

Scientists have heap big magic none the less.