this is in refute to hypewaders comment on ban banning. i dont like this sarcastic continuation of the topic but i feel it mandatory to continue it. :bugeye:

Real original assfucker. I suggested we ban ban banning :mad:

I voted yes:mad:

I disagree............


If there was no banning, you and I both know that the forums would be quickley rendered worthless by Lord know's what.

;)

Then you should vote yes.
This poll is to ban the reults of the ban banning thread from being valid.

:o

Oh dear........an oversight on my part............

nevermind......

All I know is one:

1) I don't get what "ban ban banning" means.

AND

2) Administraters should still be given the right to ban any individual whom they thinks needs to be banned. If there was no banning, you and I both know that the forums would be quickley rendered worthless by Lord know's what.
;)

I voted yes, seriously, without banning this forum will be a mess sooner or later.

who has got banned lately, i dont know?

Yeah, Is the "banning rate" very high here? And, who's the chief administrater here? Thanks!;)

david wantanabe is the manager it says at the bottom of the screen

The banning rate is actually quite low (125 including Aquisition and Exosci), as those who have been here a few years can attest. In the past, you had to make some serious waves to be banned. This is the reason that mods find it somewhat humorous when someone complains that we are facists or nazis or elitists - that we delete posts on a whim, or posts that go against our point of view. Go back in the archives and see some of the beatings we mods have taken - myself, curly1 when he was a mod, Coffee and now Xev. If we deleted posts capriciously or banned those who wrote them, theywould have never been allowed to remain.

No... to get kicked out of SciForums in the past, you have to have been pretty unrepentantly smarmy, or have taken a slap at Porf - and even then many members have been allowed to stay.

:m: Peace.