I would like to dedicate this thread to String, who wanted evidence, here it is: http://www.maxim.com/humor/stupid-fun/86265/mysterious-death-bushs-cyber-guru.html I know, old news, but new evidence. The key witness in the investigation of the voter's fraud dies a mysterious death. And this is how the number change was done: "The contracts, signed in March 2004, show that SMARTech was specifically tasked with creating a “mirror site” to manage election night results.“What this means is that Connell’s company was on both sides of the mirror,” explains Stephen Spoonamore. “And that the votes of the people of Ohio were in the control of a fiercely partisan IT company (SMARTech) and operating out of another state.”"
actually their are usually some pretty good articles in men's magazines. its not all jack off material.
Which is a statement of your opinion, not a clarification of Maxim's journalistic credentials, isn't it? ~String
Lemme know when you have proof as to fraud and not potential fraud. As always, Syz, you're so pompous as to assume that your conclusions are matters of fact. ~String
No(its my opinion not a statement of their credentials) but you seem to be implying the fact that they have naked woman in their mag means they can't have journalistic integrity. I mean their not as good as dedicated political mags but I'd put them equal to the second or third tier blogs.(more playboy than maxim)
That is precisely what I'm saying. That's your right, but that doesn't mean that Maxim is a credible journalistic source. I wonder what any credible journalist--liberal or conservative--would think of Maxim's journalistic integrity. ~String
Speaking as a former journalist, I wager they wouldn't think much of it. I certainly didn't. Nor did anyone I know.
Alright, so so far you guys got hung up on Maxim? Congratulations.... By the way Pjdude is right, after all it was the Daily Mail who broke the John Edwards story and they were right about it... Anyhow let me know when you have REAL criticism about the matter...
This is probably the least reported and probably the most important election issues in recent times and certinaly more important than the Acorn affair. If you are looking for more sources, try these on: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Mike_Connell#Controversy_over_Ohio_voting_machine_fraud http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Connell
I have to agree and the MSM is guilty of ignoring it. Not to mention the MSM's not reporting this is a sure sign of the non-existence of liberal media....
Questioning sources is real criticism and the fact you can point to an example of substandard journalism being "right" does not magically make other questionable sources less questionable. If Maxim, that cutting edge investigative magazine that people read on the toilet, is the best you can do to bolster an argument 6 years behind the dial, then you haven't got much have you?
