This makes NO sense

http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/mar/28/early-puberty-absent-fathers

How can lack of a father in one's home environment cause early puberty?

I can understand the assertion that lack of a father might contribute to early sex. A girl who misses her father may well feel the need to look elsewhere for attention to feed this emotional void, and may not always get it from appropriate sources.

But actual puberty? How can absence of a father cause the ovaries to secrete a hormone earlier than normal?

Surely early puberty is happening anyway due to other factors and, due to divorce being more common, correlation is being mistaken for causation?

(Yay...just realized I'm a lovely counterexample to this argument...I didn't grow up with a father, and I definitely didn't hit puberty early, and didn't have sex until 17....

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

)

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Ah....fair point....

They should use reverse osmosis. That will get rid of everything except H2O molecules...

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Then if you don't know about those things, why in the name of fuck and shit did you even mention them???????? What???!!

Baron Max

 

Was it a US study?
AFAIK tap water is just as prevalent in the UK for general drinking as it ever was.
Bottled is more of a "when away from home" thing, isn't it?

 

In keeping with FraggleRock's socioeconomic theory, maybe the same reasoning extends beyond tapwater...



The Falling Age of Puberty in U.S. Girls: What We Know, What We Need to Know

Is it possible that the "cheaper" brands of these products tend to contain higher percentages of damaging chemicals?


Furthermore...

GRIST

It seems that a variety of factors are at play in lower income, often "broken" households.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

So it's likely that it's actually to do with a lot of damaging environmental circumstances, rather than purely just because the kid's father left?

Once again, people are stupid, and come to stupid and overly simple conclusions.

What exactly is wrong with making a suggestion as to what the cause of a problem might be?

Quit your god damned formic-acid-in-the-skin behaviour. Just quit it.

 

Ahh, yeah! Perhaps just a little bit of my cynicism is finally getting through to you.

When you hear or read something, first consider strongly that the person is a fuckin' idiot. And second, if it's at all possible, just figure that what's said or written is just plain fuckin' wrong.

Glad to see that you're learning, VI.

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Baron Max

 

wouldn't it just be hereditary?

Hit puberty sooner, have irresponsible sex sooner, have babies sooner. Young teen mothers rarely get married. Young teen fathers rarely hang around.
And the cycle repeats itself.

 

Possibly, early developing runs in some families.

But it wouldn't necessarily mean you have irresponsible sex sooner. It's normal for girls around 13 to have boyfriends, most of these girls don't end up pregnant in their teens.

 

VI, I'm not at all sure anyone really has a clue.


You can find a study to back up just about any theory, including those that come to diametrically opposed conclusions:

Environmental Factors Influencing Growth and Pubertal Development, by Henriette A. Delemarre-van de Waal © 1993 abstract

Maybe you like this theory:


Our Stolen Future

Playboy and Penthouse did it...

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

"i read it i the guardian"

says it all.

 

Ya...

I think the "Nuclear Family Is Wonderful" brigade are just pushing an agenda.

 

WHY do you EVER post anything???

 

Obesity in the mother may be connected with early puberty in the daughter, epigenetically.

And absence of the father, sociologically.

But the various chemical possibilities remain. Poor people get a different mix than rich people, in the US.

I recall a study that showed having a dominant male around delayed male puberty in young elephants.

 

You draw distinctions between mind and body, when, as far as science has been able to discern, they are indistinguishable.

If certain environmental stimuli is absent (such as being in close proximity to a father), then the body responds. Fish change genders based on sex ratios; oysters grow thicker shells when they can smell crustaceans. Why is it such a leap of reason to suggest that humans are under similar biological controls?

This, of course, is overlooking potential environmental factors that fatherless households have more of, though I would hope that the study took simple socioeconomic data into account and controlled for it.

 

FR, tap water is better for you in any place where the systems are as good as melbourne

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Bottled water doesnt currently have floride which is in the normal water surplie

VI if we assume this study is accurate there are a number of ways it could be possable. The first is indirect, ie as FR said they tend to be low SES and there for more likly to eat foods which are not as healthy, live in areas which have higher levels of polution and have generally lower health statice

The second possablility is direct, ie the mother is giving off pherimones which are encoraging pubity and the father is giving off others which inhibit it. Sort of like how the sympathetic and para-sympathetic nervious systems work. Why this would be the case i dont know but its a possability

It would be easier to determine if you had the origional journal artical rather than a news story on it

 

Sometimes environmental changes can cause genes to kick in. It may be that it is evolutionarily useful to begin puberty early when you lose contact with your father. Losing a father would surely be dangerous and would probably mean a sooner death. Perhaps having a child sooner because you lose a parent helps in response to your shorter average life span.

Along the same lines as Orleander and Roman, in retrospect of this thread.

 

Or finding a mate.

 

It's not.