Atomic Hydrogen and release of energy

BlackLight Power Inc. claim they have managed to release hydrogen atoms using a Raney Nickel catalyst variant. The process releases large amount of heath when the Hydrogen Atoms are united to free Hydrogen Molecule.Their process has independantly been validated and confirmed by professor Peter Jansson at Rowan University. Professor Jansson is also a guest lecturer at Cambridge University UK, where he did his PH D. Please look only at the process and not the theory presented by Dr Mills until this has been confirmed elswere.

The BlackLight process is very similar to the one described by Irving Langmuir who used tungsten as the catalyst. Irving Langmuir was senior scientist at General Electric and received the Nobel Prize in 1932. His experiments is described in an abstract from a book written by Nicholas Moller "Irving Langmuir and Hydrogen Atoms". IL worked on the process with Niel Bohr an other Nobel Prize winner.,

Both processes use water as fuel

I would like al comments but only after having read PJ experiments which are documented on his website. A video has been made of how the setup looks. Also visit BlackLight power website and finally to evaluate the process it is necessary to read the above extracts by Nicholas Moller.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

do you have links?

publications?

has chevron bought them yet?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Thou shalt not break the laws of thermodynamics!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

According to the proposed theory, energy is gained due to an electron moving closer to the proton in a hydrogen atom. I wonder if some of the energy obtained can be used to move the electron back where it came from. Lo & behold, we would have a perpetual motion machine.

Well perhaps not perpetual motion, but perpetual energy production.

According to the advocates of this theory, the electron moves closer to the proton than allowed by Quantum Theory. As for cold fusion, a catalyst is lurking in the background & responsible for the process.

It seems as valid as cold Fusion, which still has the support of a lunatic fringe of mostly chemists or those who have hardly any background in science. I sometimes wonder if chemists view catalysts as analogous to Magic Pixie Dust.

BTW: Electrons in any atom can have more than one energy level. Energy is emitted or absorbed (in the form of photons) when an electron jumps (not moves in the classical sense) from one energy level to another.

I wonder why some previously unknown energy level is required in order to produce energy. Is there some reason why the energy levels predicted by current Quantum Theory cannot be used?

I am more than a bit suspicions of those who model/describe their theory using the Bohr atom, which even Bohr did not believe existed at the time when he was describing some concepts relating to the processes internal to an atom. .

It sounds like smoke & mirrors rather than real magic.

I wonder if the Dinosaur will live long enough to see this turkey carved up & disposed of.

 

It's just spam, people - worthless spam.

Nothing to see here, just keep moving along...

 

the error of the bohr atom

energy is no bound to speed (sub atomic level)......... (planck error)

comes from the environment

think of a wave dancing in the middle of the ocean, all by itself, then another wave comes across and interacts with the first. At some points the 2 will combine and increase the total potential of the 2; that is how the 'unknown' catalyst can be addressed. We only see a small range, but heat itself is just em (light)

"bohring" as the photoelectric effect or even mass spectrum variants are a wee bit cleaner to observe this analogy

no method of addressing 'l' or the amplitude of wavelengths in the physics; the subatomic levels........... angular momentum within the math removes the ability to do this.

good thinking

you bumped into the hammer

how is your day?