Caucus versus Standard System Primaries

Discussion in 'Human Science' started by coberst, Jan 19, 2009.

  1. coberst Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    949
    Caucus versus Standard System Primaries

    It appears that President Obama will be a less ideological style leader than we have had in the immediate past. It seems to be conventional wisdom that he managed this major unexpected victory because he focused great energy on winning the “caucus states”.

    For at least the last 16 years America has had a president that a large portion of the population detested. This very strong partisan driven feeling is, in my judgment, very unhealthy for our nation and, because of the power of our nation, to the whole world.

    It appears to me that it is imperative that we find candidates for the office of president, and perhaps all national offices, who will lead us from the middle rather than from the political fringe, left or right.

    Perhaps this change might be facilitated if we were to modify our manner of selecting nominees in the primary election process. If a more centrist candidate is nominated by both parties s/he will build from the center out, both to the left and right, thus leaving the most ideological factions of our society wrestling with one another out of the power picture.

    I once had a professor inform me that the in politics the views of the population might better be understood if we were to think of it as a horse shoe distribution rather than a bell curve distribution. That is to say that the two ends of the spectrum of views more closely resemble one another than they do the center.

    The caucus system is a hodgepodge as it exists today but perhaps it could be improved in such a way that our nominees will be inclined to seek the middle in the primaries rather than seeking the fringe and then trying to gain a majority of the center during the final campaign.

    What do you think?
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. mathman Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,002
    I think that the modern primary system may be a case where too much democracy may be a bad thing. Primary or caucus voters tend to reflect the most ideological wings of both parties, so candidates have to take positions which tend to the extremes, although it seems to be worse among the Republicans.

    There was a time (before 1970's) when significant numbers of delegates were selected by party bosses. For all their faults, the bosses were less concerned about ideology and more about electability, so more centrist candidates were chosen.
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. coberst Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    949
    Do you think that America would be better if our politics were less ideological?

    I define ideology as social theory which is grossly distorted by those who lack Critical Thinking skills or have a self interested reason for so distorting the theory.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.

Share This Page