View Full Version : Is there a way to make a black hole artificially?
Mr. Hamtastic
10-29-08, 11:34 AM
Tired of looking at spam, so...
If you bombarded an atom with neutrons, would it eventually become a dense black hole?
phlogistician
10-29-08, 12:16 PM
Lhc.
Bishadi
10-29-08, 12:21 PM
Tired of looking at spam, so...
If you bombarded an atom with neutrons, would it eventually become a dense black hole?
have you ever observed the 'plates' or pictures of the interactions of particles as they collide in a particle accelerator?
look to see that there will often be particles spiraling like a tornado or hurricane.....
that 'phenomenon' is the same thing that enables galaxies to exist
THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS BLACK HOLES!
the reason they even are thought to exist, is the math to perform a description of the galaxies requires a greater gravitational pull then there is, which would mean at the concentrated center, the fixed gravity to the mass must implode to a black hole..........
that is because the math is wrong!
Has nothing to do with a black hole ever existing.
The error is in the math of the physicist.
So anything lke dark energy/matter black holes or higgs bosons are all a waste of time and resource.....
sure they sound fun and interesting but none of it is science. It is all speculation and it is sold for funding purposes.
that is reality
Mr. Hamtastic
10-29-08, 12:41 PM
OK. LHC-I thought that was an atom smasher, not an atom squisher.
So, Black holes are mathematically impossible?
actualy it is math that is impossible it is all a conspiracy by the black holes but don't tell anybody.
To answer your quistion it depends on what you call a black hole, black holes generally collapse trough their own gravity so if you look at it that way then no it's not possible (but give it some 5000 years and perhaps were capeble to move giant stars on collision courses so never say never but wonder why)
Micro black holes who behave like normal black holes can't also be created as of yet however the sheir difference in mass would make that these 2 behave verry differently the later one being much more influenced by quantum effects
Mr. Hamtastic
10-29-08, 01:29 PM
Wow... orcot, Bishadi, you should scroll down to the other parts of the forum... You guys make me look normal! lol
Wow... orcot, Bishadi, you should scroll down to the other parts of the forum... You guys make me look normal! lol
Hey that's not fare to phlogistician he's at least as insane as the rest of us
A black hole has fundamental particles inside like electrons and quarks (not silly singularities). This means that there is a minimum mass for a black hole which is a number of solar masses.
Bishadi. A neutron star has an escape velocity of maybe 2/3 light speed. What is wrong with a more massive object having an escape velocity of more than light speed? We can detect very massive gravitational sources which we cannot see but which we know spin at nearly light speed. What are they?
It is now believed by some that galaxies originally form around SM black holes.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.