Biomarkers Observed Contaminating Abiotic Oil

Link

It's a major leap forward for everyone except the religious fanatics who are about to reply to this thread.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

No where does it state how the oil came about. No where were biomarkers ever mentioned. Another attempt of a moron trying to spin real science to support bullshit.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

They are too timid to publish the implications.

Do you know what a single-celled organism is?

That's the most rational and scientific argument for 20th century mythology I've ever seen.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Right?

yes

The only one here believing a myth is you. I have tried to look up abiotic oil. There is shit for evidence. I cannot find enough credible evidence to consider it a valid theory.

 

Dude, why bother.

 

For the same reason people poke caged animals with a stick.

 

They should have qualified this statement. It's a major leap forward for everyone except the 20th century religious fanatics posting above.

 

Did anyone catch the line that mentioned natural gas creation. Which I believe is a hydrocarbon. It was created through biogenic means. What is it with people not reading their own damn sources.

 

LOL.

You missed the important part. Abiotic oil is being contaminated by the organisms and broken down into methane and (much more importantly) "intermediate products."

 

I didn't miss shit. Your trying to say the article says that oil is abiotic which it doesn't. Try learning how to read.

 

All oil is abiotic: http://www.gasresources.net/DisposalBioClaims.htm

"All major oil and gas provinces in the world are apparently associated with transtensive tectonic conditions, supporting the abiogenic theory of petroleum." -- Karsten M. Storetvedt, geophysicist, August 2008

"The modern theory of the abiotic deep petroleum origins recognizes that petroleum is a primordial material of deep origin which has been erupted into the crust of the Earth. In short, petroleum is not a 'fossil fuel' and has no intrinsic connection with any biological detritus 'in the sediments'." -- Vladimir A. Kutcherov, geologist, August 2008

 

Wow the same fucking disproven crack pots again. You can quote your morons all you want still doesn't make it true. Oil companies themselves admit they find oil based on the biogenic theory. Every attempt to find oil according to the abiotic theory has failed. The only way this article proves that abiotic oil is real is if you assume that all oil is abiotic.

 

Your religious fanaticism reminds me of Tomas De Torquemada.

 

the only fanatic is you dipstick

 

Do they know of specific byproducts? I would assume the byproduct would be minimal...but what happens after a long period of time...such that the supply is depleted?

 

So they turn useful hydrocarbons into methane.... I'm not really sure what the big deal is, other than that they're ruining all that oil.

 

It's impossible to deplete an infinite resource.

 

It's possible to deplete local resources.

 

I'm not sure about that. I don't believe that.

"The idea of finiteness is a prejudice and it is not supported by available facts. Incredible as it may seem, the term "finite" is not only inappropriate, it is downright misleading when applied to natural resources." -- Julian L. Simon, economist, 1997

 

Fine then; don't tell me the byproducts.