The truth: certain people really ARE superior

I mean, it's just true. I don't see why people are against these kinds of notions, but they are reality. As much as I do pity and wish well to, say, mentally disabled peoples, and I certainly feel for them and say "God Bless" to them, and I would never mock or make fun of, the average person IS superior. Biologically.

That's just fact. Certain people are biologically better. Certain people have purer blood than others.


It's true, isn't it?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

What does "purer" mean, in terms of blood? You mean it isn't as impure (but wtf does that mean) as some other kinds, and you don't literally mean the stuff they keep frozen in bags in hospitals, right?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I mean, some people are pure blood such as myself and others are, to use a fictional term, mudbloods. That is the truth, how can you deny it?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

when i read the first post i had a feeling harry potter was going to come into play... and mudbloods proves it
Are you saying that a pure race, like what hitler was trying to make, is whats better?

 

Not "better", simply biologically superior. Better is subjective, one could fine a mudblood better, but technically, purebloods are.


Also the only reason I used Harry Potter terminology was because it was available and would convey my point.

 

Biologically superior in what sense? And blood really isn't I'd focus on if I were trying to make this argument, genes would be.

 

In that they are "more" Human, or simply superior in intellect and physical agility and strength.

 

i wasnt making fun of you for using harry potter, i like the books... just thought it was funny


But this does kind of sound more like what hitler thought

 

So? That's what I'm saying, what if he was right?


I admit, while I do agree with him that there are certain people who are superior, I DO NOT *REPEAT* DO NOT BELIEVE that those who are "inferior" deserve to be treated any less better.


I do agree with social equality, I am simply saying that biologically, I think there really ARE superior people, such as *ahem* myself, to some others. And some of you are also perhaps on my line.

 

Thats your key thought

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

personally, i dont know if im pure or not, i was adopted because my other family was very very poor and couldnt afford to keep me around, they had 2 kids already

 

What gives you the idea that having come from one regional/ethnological group makes you superior?
Do you have any research that backs up this notion?
Oh, yes. You are essentially racist. Or some other similar ____ist. I suppose you might say that all races are equal but all mixes are not as good. So technically this might not qualify as racist. But it is very offensive and ______ist in its own right.

 

As I said, socially, I am not against anyone. Only biologically, mixed peoples are inadequate compared to purer people.

I do not wish to sound arrogant, but I am pure AND a Semite to boot, therefore I am, perhaps, at the heighest of the ethnic tree.


It's pure biology, not morality or anything else.

 

actually if dogs are any indication its better to be a mut

 

people are better at different things

sure some people are fast learners and can be better than you at a bunch of things, but if you know that person well enough, no matter how perfect he may seem eventually flaws will begin appearing.

 

Heh, you were doing sort of fine until you got to this post. What exactly is it about being a semite that makes you superior? Are you faster than most people? Stronger? Smarter? Or just louder?

And like pjdude said, being a mutt would be better. Genetic diversity increases the chances for survival.

 

Good adding the 'Semite' part makes it easy to class you as a racist.

But again. What proof do you have that those pure in race are better or more adequate.

You should also get some DNA testing done on yourself. You might be surprised to find yourself having some impurities in there.

But the main thing here is: back up this notion. A superior being like yourself should be able to produce some evidence that we mud people can pore over in awe.

 

Not really. He was saying those with diverse ethnicity are inferior. I'll admit the semite bit made it easier to categorize him, but he was already a bigot in this thread before he made himself fit nicely in the racist category.

 

I took his initial talk as being a proponent of genetic superiority, with him saying blood instead of genes out of ignorance or confusion. Were we to treat humans like dogs, I'm sure that sort of idea could be proven true, which is why I gave him credit till the last post.

I should stop assuming these sort of things. :/

 

'Purer blood' and 'superiority' should set off warning bells. But then you are an optimist and the world needs these. You must have good genes.