The reality is that today there is a widespread anti-islamic propaganda in the media and many people in power have come to regard everything islamic as evil. The other reality is that, although there are very many different and contrasting views among muslims and despite the fact that many muslim groups openly denounced violence and terrorism (a matter which has not been reflected in the media bacause of their preferred stance on islam), there is a tendency to keep all muslims responsible for the acts of groups such as Al-Qaeda. Also we should remember that a single attack on the U.S. soil which claimed the lives of around 4,000 innocent people created such a big circle of violent response that has taken the lives of more than 500,000 muslims and the destruction of two islamic countries so far. All these considered and taken the avenging nature of Al-Qaeda into consideration I come to you with this question: Suppose the recent level of tension and mutual escalation continues and as a result of it Al-Qaeda manages to get a nuke from somewhere and decides to use it against the U.S. in the U.S. soil. Do you not think that with the current speed of anger and paranoia which has overwhelmed the U.S., the U.S. response to such an attack by Al-Qaeda (who in the meantime rejects many other muslims as kafirs and is rejected by them) would be not less than nuking many, if not all, islamic countries indifferent of thier political stance on the issue and thus destroying a quarter of the civilized world? Shouldn't somebody somehow say stop to th,s escalation??
