Crunchy! Old news to this fox. But thank you for posting the article, I was getting really tired of people claiming neutrinos don't really exist because of the incorrect numbers detected. Or those who claim neutrinos are just a mathematical trick... well, to be fair, neutrinos started as a mathematical trick, but they were then discovered to be real.
And that is one of the weirdest things. And a damn good example of the value of science. Some people thought about it and suggested it might exist, and it turned out to exist. Weird.
what is the problem with this paper from 1946: http://www.autodynamics.org/new99/Experiments/PR1946.html why didn't the four detectors detect the neutrino burst at the same time + two of them didn't detect anything + faster or slower then the speed of light?: http://www.autodynamics.org/new99/Neutrino/SN1987A.html -------- corrected the links + date (it is 1946)
Can you post correct links please? I couldn't find a paper from 1948. I'll check out the page if you'd like, just make sure you post propper links. Yours just drop me to an index where they speak against general relativity. I'll avoid the urge to speak up on GR warping time and space.