planets shapes

Discussion in 'Astronomy, Exobiology, & Cosmology' started by stephen1992, Aug 10, 2007.

  1. stephen1992 Registered Member

    Messages:
    54
    why are all the planets we know of spherical
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. one_raven God is a Chinese Whisper Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,433
    Have you ever done that trick where you hold a bucket of water by the handle, and spin it over your head without spilling any?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. one_raven God is a Chinese Whisper Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,433
    Have you ever used a sling, or seen one used?
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. one_raven God is a Chinese Whisper Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,433
    When you ride a bicycle in the rain, does your back get wet from the rear tire?
     
  8. stephen1992 Registered Member

    Messages:
    54
  9. one_raven God is a Chinese Whisper Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,433
    Same principle.

    Click
     
  10. stephen1992 Registered Member

    Messages:
    54
    so because of the way they spin round it keeps the shape constant
     
  11. one_raven God is a Chinese Whisper Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    13,433
    Well, the shape isn't exactly constant, and it's not quite spherical either, but yeah.
    That and gravity pulling it into itself.
    A mountain crumbles, and it falls toward the planet, while the centrifugal force pushes against gravity.
    The two forces working together (or against each other) and you have a roughly spherical shape.
     
  12. orcot Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    3,488
    The IAU has this as the second rule for clasifiing as a planet:
    .

    Basicly it's the gravity of the object that makes it round... altough the composition has also much to do with it ice moons need far less mass then rocky planets/moons do so either the outer layer get's heated above it's melting point and assumes a sphere formation like a drop of mercury or the internal compression chearches for a weak point back out making the object bulge at it's lowest radius point...
     
  13. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,426
    I don't think it has anything to do with centrifugal force. If Earth didn't rotate, it would still be approximately spherical (disregarding minor surface features such as Mount Everest and ocean trenches).

    Think of what would happen if the Earth was a cube, for example. Then, the corners would be the furthest points from the centre of the cube, and gravity would act to collapse them towards the centre. No rotation is required.
     
  14. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
  15. GhostofMaxwell. Banned Banned

    Messages:
    480
    Centrifugal force is Psuedo . Centripetal force is only relevant in Physics.
     
  16. Atom Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    928
    Its a small world but I wouldn't want to paint it.
     
  17. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    it has to do with angular momentum and the energy stored in a rotating mass L*ω/2
     
  18. Atom Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    928
    I disagree.

    Eccentrifugal force is the way to go.
     
  19. Atom Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    928
    Thats weird...I have a friend who is a ball of energy and his name is very similar. Lewis.
     
  20. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    Is your friend surrounded by vacuum and accelerated around the sun?
     
  21. GhostofMaxwell. Banned Banned

    Messages:
    480
    how does it pertain to momentum? if anyting it would be due to velocity(acceleration due to change of direction), but it doesn't. It doesnt exist!
     
  22. Dinosaur Rational Skeptic Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,885
    Center fleeing force is an illusion.

    Consider being on an amusment park ride that spins you along a circular path. Your tactical sense indicates that your body is trying to move away from the enter of rotation (an illusion). What is actually happening is that inertia is trying to move your body along a path tangential to the circle along which you are moving, while (assuming you are facing the center of rotation) your back is subject to a force acting toward the center of rotation.

    There is no force acting along a radial path in the direction away from the center, only an illusion of such a force due to the pressure against your back due to the force acting toward the center.
     
  23. Starthane Xyzth returns occasionally... Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,465

Share This Page