I think Ann Coulter had it right. Some of the 911 widows are acting like morons. This one threw a fit at the airport because she was too good for security or check-in. http://www.nypost.com/seven/0507200...onalnews_jeremy_olshan___transit_reporter.htm Yes it's awful that her husband was killed. But she and some of her whiny-@ss friends are making all 911 widows look bad. [link deleted as spam]
Frankly, they deserve it. When bad things happen to people, you find out what sort of character they really have. The 9/11 widows instantly seized on the tragey of their lives as an excuse for multi-million law suits and government hand-outs. One of my favorite pleas, was one lady whose bond trader husband had died said she didn't think her life should have to change because of the death and she didn't think her kids should have to drop out of private school. Now we're paying for them to go to private school...
1. The New York Post is written by scum-sucking Republican bootlickers. 2. There was no indication in that article that the woman had liberal political views. 3. She was in fact, a Port Authority Commissioner, so her complaints were not entirely without merit. 4. Have you no shame? 5. No point to the Ann Coulter link, deleted as spam. 6. If not for the 9/11 widows, there would never have been a 9/11 commission to investigate 9/11.
So now even personal, hand-picked laisons between Republican CEO mayors and WTC families - the very people in charge of catching the whine flak from those selfish families, the people who have been defending their Republican CEO bosses from selfish whining about realistic and pragmatic decisions that have to be made - are "whiny libs" ? http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,218505,00.html She didn't want the screeners to go through her jewelry? I don't blame her. The Homeland Security hiring standards are a joke. Rich Republican women with jewelry have been known to find some of it missing. She felt abused by having to be screened? I don't blame her. Why in hell don't we have a fly list for the vetted ? It's been years now, and Homeland Bureaucracy still has these stupid long lines and everybody's taking their shoes off and little old ladies are getting their Depends wanded by punks with attitudes, and there still is no FBI searchable database or vetted fly list or reasonable screening procedure. If some clown ever tries to sneak on a plane with explosive underwear, what are these Keystone Kops gonna make us do?
We have had to put up with your whining and your constant blattering about god, Bush, the Republicans being god's gift to human kind, how hot you are, blah, blah, blah. We let it go because we virtually take you to be a simpleton. This time, however, you have gone too far. Have you no shame? What kind of low and disgusting individual says what you have said above? Did you even read the article? Are you able to read and comprehend? God damn you make my skin crawl. She is not making them look bad. You, however, make all Republicans look bad. And your attempt to attack her and other 9/11 widows is not only pathetic, it is downright low and frankly, appalling. You claim in your sciwiki profile that you have never and will never be banned from a forum because you are just "too cute"? Don't bet on it if you keep posting crap like this. You are just as bad, if not worse. Refer to above and apply it to yourself.
People should be banned for constant personal attacks, not for posting their opinion on a topic. People have said a hell of a lot worse on here than this. It is my opinion that some of the widows have gone too far.
Hiding behind 'opinion' does not work sandy. Yes people have said a hell of a lot worse and have been banned for it. Some have been banned for saying less than you have. Your argument that you should be absolved of all responsibility and no one should question your motives because it is a personal opinion is ridiculous. If I were to use your argument, I could very well say it is my 'opinion' that you have gone too far and are downright low for having used the argument you have in your OP. Lame, no?
Lighten up BELLS. You deleted a legitimate link and let the most moronic hate links stay up. I got a whole thread deleted and the only way to do it was by being creative and psy op., when i PM a mod they dont do shit for ME.
Which link of yours did I delete in Human Science John? Do you have a link to the thread where I did this?
No Bells i meant Sandy's link, SPAM?? BS. Did'nt she get run off another board allready? So why is everyone attacking her? she's the best thing to happen here in a long time....LET HER BE!
I never got run off anywhere. I have left other sites out of boredom or for personal reasons but never banned. Not ever. I try not to p!ss off mods too much but it's hard around here since most are atheists. p.s. Thanks John99
Ann Coulter is on Hannity tonite. She's brilliant.Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! And she looks amazingPlease Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
Ann Coulter is great. She tells the truth bluntly and some people just can't handle that. She's talking about how Duncan Hunter is the best candidate for POTUS. I don't think he can win.
Huh? In case it has escaped your notice John, and it appears it has, I am a moderator in Human Science. NOT Politics. Therefore, I cannot remove links in any other forum aside from the Human Science one. So pray tell John. How have I removed sandy's link from this particular thread? I await your answer with quite a bit of anticipation.
