Cosmic Forces Control Life on Earth

[Vega]

The rise and fall of species on Earth might be driven in part by the undulating motions of our solar system as it travels through the disk of the Milky Way, scientists say...
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/070423_cosmic_evo.html

[Mosheh Thezion]

OH MY....

it didnt say anything about how much time we have left before we are exposed again...

any thoughts.?

-MT

[Vega]

OH MY....

it didnt say anything about how much time we have left before we are exposed again...

any thoughts.?

-MT

According to my research just under 5 years!

[Ophiolite]

The rise and fall of species on Earth might be driven in part by the undulating motions of our solar system as it travels through the disk of the Milky Way, scientists say...[/URL]The concept has the benefit of being non-Cartesian and recognising the place of life within a complex, multi-layered system.

[Mosheh Thezion]

5 years???

based on what???

-MT

[Vega]

5 years???

based on what???

-MT
My research of course!

[Mosheh Thezion]

please... do tell....

[Vega]

please... do tell....
Indeed! you can read all about it in my new book due shortly this year.

[DwayneD.L.Rabon]

Below is the motion medium (polarity)for the elements in the earths crust.

% Precentages of the earths crust/ earth

Oxygen 46.43% CS
Silicon 27.77% SS
Aluminum 8.14% GS
Iron 5.12% SS
Calcium 3.62% SS
Magnesium 2.09% GS
Sodium 2.85% GS
Potassium 2.60% GS
Hydrogen 0.127% CS
The other 83 elements 1.253%


Earth is
46.557 % Cosmic Sensitive
15.68% Galaxtic Sensitive
36.51% Solar Sensitive

Appearently earth is cosmic senstive, to add to this humans are 80 to 90%
cosmic sensitive, it appears that the motion of the cosmos provides a great
amount of stablity making orbits and life stable.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

[Read-Only]

Below is the motion medium (polarity)for the elements in the earths crust.

% Precentages of the earths crust/ earth

Oxygen 46.43% CS
Silicon 27.77% SS
Aluminum 8.14% GS
Iron 5.12% SS
Calcium 3.62% SS
Magnesium 2.09% GS
Sodium 2.85% GS
Potassium 2.60% GS
Hydrogen 0.127% CS
The other 83 elements 1.253%


Earth is
46.557 % Cosmic Sensitive
15.68% Galaxtic Sensitive
36.51% Solar Sensitive

Appearently earth is cosmic senstive, to add to this humans are 80 to 90%
cosmic sensitive, it appears that the motion of the cosmos provides a great
amount of stablity making orbits and life stable.

DwayneD.L.Rabon

Just what is all this "cosmic sensitive" nonsense supposed to be??????????

[Nikelodeon]

Some astrology nonsense?

[DwayneD.L.Rabon]

Well it is the sensitivity of various atomic elements, where in each atomic element is responsive to either the events of the solar system, events of the galaxy or events of the cosmos. For example carbon is the most polar element of the the atomic periodic chart, it is highly sensitive to events with our solar system, of which due to that high senistivity life exist within our solar system. mainly on our planet.
elements that are major structures of support for life are found in the SS catagory (SS solar senistive), chemicals that act as signal chemicals in cellular life such as lipids are found in the GS catagory (GSgalaxtic senisitive) that includes such things as ions that are released from nerves to cause a response in various tissues,, and cellular fuild ect...., The Cosmic Senistive (CS) is the general medium of the body, elements that comprise the medium of the body in the case of humans and life on earth that is water, both hydrogen and oxygen are atomic elements that are sensitive to events in the cosmos. the cosmos is huge and engulfing and, its effect is abundant encompassing the earth and so makes a nice stable enviroment for life.
Appreantly the galaxy governs much of what we think, as the ions that are released from are neurons are listed within the galaxtic catagory.

The below list can be quite helpful in understanding how humans fit into the rest of universe, the galaxy and the solar system of planets. it's priceless

Here is the complete list,

THE GALAXTIC PERIODIC CHART OF THE ELEMENTS, by DwayneD.L.Rabon
CS -16 ARGON
CS 2.660 BROMINE (GS)
CS 1.720 CHLORINE
CS -47 FLOURINE
CS -99 HELIUM
CS -86 HYDROGEN
CS 1.160 KRYPTON
CS 2.330 MERCURY (GS)
CS -75 NEON
CS -37 NITROGEN
CS -45 OXYGEN
CS 2.020 RADON (GS)
CS 1.620 XENON
GS 9.330 ALUMINIUM
GS 9.030 ANTIMONY
GS 8.090 ARSENIC
GS 5.750 ASTATINE
GS 10.00 BARIUM
GS 8.150 BISMUTH
GS 5.940 CADMIUM
GS 10.71 CERIUM (SS)
GS 3.010 CESIUM
GS 10.95 EUROPIUM (SS)
GS 3.000 FRANCIUM
GS 3.020 GALLIUM
GS 4.290 INDIUM
GS 3.860 IODINE
GS 6.000 LEAD
GS 4.530 LITHIUM
GS 9.230 MAGNESIUM
GS 9.170 NEPTUNIUM
GS 3.170 PHOSPHORUS
GS 9.130 PLUTONIUM
GS 5.270 POLONIUM
GS 3.360 POTASSIUM
GS 9.730 RADIUM
GS 3.120 RUBIDIUM
GS 4.530 SELENIUM
GS 3.700 SODIUM
GS 10.50 STRONTIUM (SS)
GS 3.860 SULFUR
GS 7.220 TELLURIUM
GS 5.770 THALLIUM
GS 5.040 TIN
GS 10.92 YTTERBIUM (SS)
GS 6.920 ZINC

SS 13.24 ACTINIUM
SS 14.49 AMERICIUM
SS 13.23 BERKELIUM
SS 15.60 BERYLLIUM
SS 23.48 BORON
SS 11.15 CALCIUM
SS 11.73 CALIFORNIUM
SS 37.73 CARBON
SS 21.80 CHROMIUM
SS 17.68 COBALT
SS 13.57 COPPER
SS 16.18 CURIUM
SS 16.85 DYSPROSIUM
SS 11.33 EINSTENIUM
SS 18.02 ERBIUM
SS 18.00 FERMIUM
SS 15.86 GADOLINIUM
SS 12.11 GERMANIUM
SS 13.37 GOLD
SS 25.06 HAFNIUM
SS 17.47 HOLMIUM
SS 27.19 IRIDIUM
SS 18.11 IRON
SS 11.91 LANTHANIUM
SS 19.00 LAWRENCIUM
SS 19.36 LUTETIUM
SS 15.19 MANGANESE
SS 11.00 MENDELEVIUM
SS 28.96 MOLYBDENUM
SS 12.94 NEODYMIUM
SS 17.28 NICKEL
SS 27.50 NIOBIUM
SS 11.00 NOBELIUM
SS 33.06 OSMIUM
SS 18.27 PALLADIUM
SS 20.41 PLATINUM
SS 12.04 PRASEODYMIUM
SS 13.15 PROMETHIUM
SS 18.45 PROTACTINIUM
SS 34.59 RHENIUM
SS 22.37 RHODIUM
SS 27.07 RUTHENIUM
SS 13.47 SAMARIUM
SS 18.14 SCANDIUM
SS 16.87 SILICON
SS 12.34 SILVER
SS 32.90 TANTALUM
SS 24.30 TECHNETIUM
SS 16.29 TERBIUM
SS 20.23 THORIUM
SS 18.18 THULIUM
SS 19.41 TITANIUM
SS 36.95 TUNGSTEN
SS 14.08 URANIUM
SS 21.83 VANADIUM
SS 17.95 YTTRIUM
SS 21.28 ZIRCONIUM

DwayneD.L.Rabon

[Read-Only]

Well it is the sensitivity of various atomic elements, where in each atomic element is responsive to either the events of the solar system, events of the galaxy or events of the cosmos.

And why, pray tell, would any element on Earth be sensitive to these "events" - and what ARE these "events?"

[DwayneD.L.Rabon]

Well, the events are the general motion of the each catagory,

well all elements have their engery and their energy responds to another point of energy, such as a electron responds to a magnetic feild, and a magnetic feild changes to the addtion of a electron.

the cosmos. the galaxy and the solar system have thier energy and each atomic element responds to one of them.


DwayneD.L.Rabon

[Read-Only]

Well, the events are the general motion of the each catagory,

well all elements have their engery and their energy responds to another point of energy, such as a electron responds to a magnetic feild, and a magnetic feild changes to the addtion of a electron.

the cosmos. the galaxy and the solar system have thier energy and each atomic element responds to one of them.


DwayneD.L.Rabon

Interesting! A whole new branch of physics that not one professional scientist is even aware of...

[DwayneD.L.Rabon]

Well Read-only
I would not say a new branch of physics, you however might find something simular in cryogenics, or supercondtivity reasearch.

The truth is that any atomic element can be picked up by a magnetic feild, the list given defines what the natural polarity of the atomic elements is and to what region of the universe it responds to.
Dna and Rna are a balance of cosmic sensetive atoms and solar senstive atoms bound to each other base by a galaxtic senstive atom.

I am sure it will be worth your time to use the chart in your analoy of the life that we have on earth, and in looking at the possiblity of life in other solar systems. In general the list allows you to look at what atomic elements would be used in the structure of life, for example the polarity of carbon is
simular to that of tungsten, or atomic elements of the platinium family group,
platinium seems to be a atomic element that might harbor life in other solar sysetms as it has the polaity and the ablity to bind with hydrogen, simular to carbon allowing the lifeform the comforts of the cosmos!

DwayneD.L.Rabon

[Dinosaur]

Read-Only: Dwayne posted here a year or so ago. I wondered if he was serious or merely joking. I still wonder.

BTW: Check out the Flat Earth Society. These folk are funny. They have a Web Site.

I first became aware of them when they awarded a prize (about $100.00) to some early US Astronaut. The prize was for trick photographic effects. The astronaut photographed the Earth from an orbiting satellite. The award was accompanied by comments likeTo a naive viewer that would seem to be evidence that the Earth is not flat.I think they are a group of affluent Englishmen who meet regularly at a pub.

[DwayneD.L.Rabon]

Well of course i am serious aout the chart that i have posted, it is a good means to look at the alignment of the atomic elements on earth and how they sort out amoung the different regions of our universe.

The chart catagories could be more selectively defined to different parts of the universe. example it appears that helium is attracted to the coldest parts of the universe, so then in deduction where helium resides in groups in the universe it must be some of the coldest places in the universe/cosmos

If the differences between various parts of the galaxy are noted the chart could catagorized to show those atomic elements atraction to those measured regions of the galaxy.

One thing to remember is or deduct from the chart if you read it is that these elements are with in the enviroment of the earth, and so there immediate reaction is altered by the earths enviroment, for example the enviromental constant of the earth is 288 kelvins. much higher than the
attractive index for any of the elements.


what question is there about the use of the chart?

DwayneD.L.Rabon

[Oli]

So how are these sensitivities measured?
How are the separate influences distinguished from each other all elements apparently are influenced by three things at the same time?
what question is there about the use of the chart?
How about: what use IS the chart?

[DwayneD.L.Rabon]

The atomic elements are averaged against the background for each region, solar system, galaxy, and cosmos.


By magnetic feild

Well you can use the chart for what every you like i assume, i like to look at the various orders in which things are aligned in human biochemistry such as Dna, human body element content, for example the human body is 80 to 90 percent water which is all cosmic sensitive. foe me it allwo other refferences as well, such as the possiblities of the types of atomic elements that might exist as componets of the structure of other alien life, for example tugnsten it polaity/sensetivity is nearly the same as carbon, carbon being the most polar. and to solar events accounts for the organization of carbon chemistry,
resulting in life.

Or for example the defining the interior of a space capsule, given the polarity of silicon it acts as a refractor of the same force that cause carbon organization, and therefor the interior of a space capsule in the interest of
it occupants would be composed of silicon.


DwayneD.L.Rabon

[Oli]

Read-Only:
Interesting! A whole new branch of physics that not one professional scientist is even aware of...
And a whole series of irony that the target subject is not aware of...:D

DDLR:
By magnetic feild
Rubbish answer. How do you determine which proportion of the magnetic field is attributable to each "influence"?

Well you can use the chart for what every you like i assume
To build an anti-stupidity device? Please.

Or for example the defining the interior of a space capsule, given the polarity of silicon it acts as a refractor of the same force that cause carbon organization, and therefor the interior of a space capsule in the interest of
it occupants would be composed of silicon.
If the occupants are made of silicon then surely they'll be naturally immune to "forces that organise carbon"?

This is deep woowoo territory, you realise that?

[Read-Only]

Read-Only: Dwayne posted here a year or so ago. I wondered if he was serious or merely joking. I still wonder.

BTW: Check out the Flat Earth Society. These folk are funny. They have a Web Site.

I first became aware of them when they awarded a prize (about $100.00) to some early US Astronaut. The prize was for trick photographic effects. The astronaut photographed the Earth from an orbiting satellite. The award was accompanied by comments likeI think they are a group of affluent Englishmen who meet regularly at a pub.

Thanks, Dinosaur, those folks ARE funny! They are really enjoying poking fun at the real flat-Earth people through satire. Nice job, too!

As to Dwayne, I' believe he's quite serious, though sadly misguided (or something similar). I went back and looked at some of his very old posts. Egad!!!

One thing in particular that struck me as being both highly amusing and very sad at the same time is where he claimed - repeatedly - that the center of the Earth has a temperature of about absolute zero. And he wasn't kidding one bit, he actually believes it!

He never learned that kind of thing at any school in the modern world. I also saw where he indicated that rather than attending public school he was tutored by some military officer. I shudder to think what military organization that nut-case must belong to if that's where Dwayne learned about geophysics! :eek:

[Dinosaur]

Read-Only: Strange as it seems, Dwayne seems to be serious. He still reminds me of the Flat Earth Society.

Some time ago there was a poster who was an expert in double talk. It took me a while to decide he was having fun rather than being a crackpot.

[DwayneD.L.Rabon]

This is almost tyo funny, as it is so simple i have to wonder what could possibly be the problem with understanding the application of the chart.

Dinosaur what could you even possibly find wrong with the chart, appearantly you have not even read the list or assumed its refference in
any analogy of life on our planet.

Read only of course i calculate that the interior of the world is as cold as space itself. common sense sould demonstrate that the center of the world was cold. As it clear to many people have put time and effort into the iron core of hot nature as if it is the depths of hell, the base of thier phsycology is thier child hood religon, and the toy magnetics that they played with.

example what element is used to make iron a magnetic as iron it self produces no magnetic feild of permeant nature.?

Oli iam not sure what your reference means as to proportion of manetic feild, are you assembling the magnetic feild in to various geoids, such as with earth
(layers of magentic feild)..... nuclear feild or non nuclear feild.

That catagories as i said before are seperated by average of the background constant of those regions of space.


DwayneD.L.Rabon

[DwayneD.L.Rabon]

As the topic is about cosmic forces controlling life on earth, it appears than 90 percent of the human body was controlled by cosmic forces given the polar sensitvity of atomic elements found in the chart posted.

So what ever the wave of the universe is it will be a sub frequence of the human body and water

DwayneD.L.Rabon

[Read-Only]

Read only of course i calculate that the interior of the world is as cold as space itself. common sense sould demonstrate that the center of the world was cold. As it clear to many people have put time and effort into the iron core of hot nature as if it is the depths of hell, the base of thier phsycology is thier child hood religon, and the toy magnetics that they played with.


Really? Then aside from volcanoes and the fact that the Earth's tectonic plates are floating on something liquid, how do you explain what we find in very deep mines? The deeper we go, the hotter it gets. According to you, it should be getting cooler.

Nothing to do with religion/hell, just simple observed facts.

[EmptyForceOfChi]

its a publicity stunt to sell his book,

peace.

[Ophiolite]

Really? Then aside from volcanoes and the fact that the Earth's tectonic plates are floating on something liquid,.Just for clarification, they aren't...floating on something...liquid. The mantle is solid. Solids can flow over time. Tiny parts of the mantle occasionally melt, giving rise to magmas which may eventiually erupt at the surface, or intrude into crustal rocks.

[Read-Only]

Just for clarification, they aren't...floating on something...liquid. The mantle is solid. Solids can flow over time. Tiny parts of the mantle occasionally melt, giving rise to magmas which may eventiually erupt at the surface, or intrude into crustal rocks.

Good point! But please explain something for me: if they aren't being forced away from each other at the mid-ocean rifts, what causes them to move away from it? And what provides the motive force for the rest of the plates as well?

[Ophiolite]

There are two mechanisms at work. They are being pushed apart by convection currents that rise at the mid-ocean ridges. However these convection currents take place within the solid mantle. Remember that total movement is equivalent to about a couple of centimetres per year.
Also the cold descending slab in subductions zones is thought to pull the rest of the plate after it. There has been debate as to which of these effects is the more important. I do not know what the current opinion on the matter is.

[Read-Only]

There are two mechanisms at work. They are being pushed apart by convection currents that rise at the mid-ocean ridges. However these convection currents take place within the solid mantle. Remember that total movement is equivalent to about a couple of centimetres per year.
Also the cold descending slab in subductions zones is thought to pull the rest of the plate after it. There has been debate as to which of these effects is the more important. I do not know what the current opinion on the matter is.

Thank you. :) That's the way I understood it but I've never made a serious study on the topic ans was just relying on what is probably general, popular thought.

As to that last part, I would tend to think (even given that cooling tends to cause sinking) that it most likely would be the result of a pushing force since subduction, by common definition, implies being forced beneath the other plate. I could certainly be wrong but it seem the most logical thing for me, anyway.