` So much for her promise to the saps of The Soviet Socialist Republik of New York to serve her full 2nd senate term ! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Clinton: 'I’m in and I’m in to win' Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton unveiled her intentions to begin a widely anticipated campaign for the White House on Saturday. wheeeee !!!
Don't forget, she says that she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary (who climbed Everest four years AFTER she was born), so she will come at this with the dogged determination of Sir Edmund, ostensibly.
She said her mom said she was named after Sir Edmund. I wouldn't hold that against a potential employee of Burger King, much less a candidate for the office of President.
Another reason I hate Clinton: She can't even keep her implied promise to my state. But yes, she basically is going to give the presidency to a Republican.
1. She isn't quitting her Senate seat. 2. She is popular and has star power and money, so she's a serious contender, that's why you all are terrified.
I wonder how mainstream Americans are going to view a woman whose husband got blowjobs in their own home, yet she took him back and claims to be happily married? Hillary: "Hi, honey, how was your day?" Bill: "Oh, it was okay, honey, but ...you know, not great." Hillary: "Oh, none of the young interns sucked you off today?" Bill: "Oh, crap, honey, don't be nagging me about that, okay?!" Hillary: "Why, honey, I wasn't nagging you ...thought if you didn't get a good blowjob, I'd call one of the local escort services. I love you, honey, and don't want you to be sad and horny." Bill: "Oh, well, ...okay! There's a new girl down at the ........." .....LOL!! Baron Max
Spidergoat: She should have to quit her senate seat, considering she will be not doing anything for the next two years as a senator. I support an amendment to the constitution that mandates all political candidates must finish their term before running for another office. But as to her popularity: She is being crushed in the polls by the Republican "probably will be" candidates, as well as Barak Obama. She is not liked by either women or men, and hated by anyone who is not an arch-liberal. She would not be a good person to run.
Which means she won't be doing any less than she did for the last six - unless you count using the office as a platform to criticize the Republigoons - not that they don't deserve it. I wouldn't waste it on 'em. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
your gettin it dude...Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!
What I wonder is why you think that is relevant to her capacity to govern the nation? For that matter, why do you think Bill Clinton's personal sex life was relevant to his ability to govern the nation?
One's "personal sex life" takes place outside the workplace. On his employers' nickel/time clock, and within his employers' place of work, one has no strictly "personal" life. His inability to properly govern himself speaks directly to his ability to be expected to properly govern both those who did and did not elect him to the office. Sex for the Public Good has never been a part of the position's Oath of Service(s).
