Objection to the Closer of the Columbine Thread

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by Prince_James, Dec 15, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    I'd like to petition for the reopening of the Columbine thread, on the foundation that discussion of the Columbine "tragedy" is a totally legitimate topic of discussion, specifically in light of the fact that Sederenzi was posting it in light of allegations made on a website in regards to a big cover up and such. Whether or not this is true is another thing entirely, but there was nothing in and of itself objectionable about it.

    Let us please stop with with the moderator censorship of topics for no reason whatsoever.
     
  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    this world is controlled not by us but by totalitarian regime of James R. and other moderators. Respect the moderators or they will punish you severely. All their actions are justified...because they hold power over us...because they use force.
     
  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Eww. I made a typo on the thread. Sorry about that everyone. I detest when that happens.
     
  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    I have as little compassion for Sderenzi or the fate of his thread as I do for those killed at Columbine. However, I find the reprimanding of Sderenzi for being uncompassionate to be quite disturbing.

    It's against the rules to be uncompassionate now?

    This is incredibly lame.
     
  8. Prince_James Plutarch (Mickey's Dog) Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,214
    Indeed it is.
     
  9. original sine Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    924
    That topic deserved termination. There is no Columbine conspiracy.
     
  10. invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Doesn't mean you can't talk about it.

    Sderenzi wasn't cited for posting a fallacious conspiracy thread, rather he was cited for uncompassionate statements.
     
  11. original sine Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    924
    That's no reason to close a thread.
     
  12. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    The thread was closed because querying whether the Columbine shootings happened or not is blatantly brainless. The closure had nothing to do with sderenzi's failings as a human being.
     
  13. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    ...You take yourself for God, don't you?:bugeye:
     
  14. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
  15. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    what right do you have than to judge who has failed as a human being?
     
  16. Sauna Banned Banned

    Messages:
    763
    Who questioned whether the shootings happened?

    The issue was the veracity of the official version, not the actuality of the event.

    Did somebody not even bother to follow the link?

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  17. Hello. Sorry to change the subject somewhat, after all, we all know how vitally important sderenzi's rights to free-yeauk! are - but I just couldn't help wondering, are you at all familiar with a fellow we have around here, goes by the name of Meanwhile at all...?
     
  18. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    what are you implying...that its the same persona since they got same ip addresses or somethin? :bugeye:
     
  19. James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    The same right as any other fellow human being.

    Note also that I didn't say that sderenzi has failed as a human being.

    Weren't the thread title and the attached poll sufficient to get the meaning?

    If not, the initial post should have been clear.

    I'm paying for what I download, and I'm not about to watch every youtube movie posted here just to check on its contents.
     
    Last edited: Dec 16, 2006
  20. .... Oh, perish the thought old man. Just merely asking a polite question is all. Similar view points, mannerisms and so forth... Wondered if possibly they were related.
     
  21. Genji Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,285

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    I'm staying COMPLETELY out of this brouhaha.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
  22. draqon Banned Banned

    Messages:
    35,006
    Im not an old man.! I am a man allright, but not old.
     
  23. ... I love that word, brouhaha.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page