Did our ancestors always live as savages?

Such as species homo Sapiens and homo habilis?

I think these fuckers were pretty smart as they used to kill mammoths by tricking them to the edged of a cliff and then pushing them off.


Plus if they really were savages, don't you think they would have killed themselves off and did cannibalism and shit like that, and like rape and do homosexuality?

What I want to know is why do ppl make stupid claims like homo habilis were savages? when they possible couldn't have been.

The Negro's race does far more savage things then our ancestors inherently evil/savagery sorcery is not learned. Naturally all beings civilized being align to nobleness and good.

If you live a baby in the jungle or kicked it off the roof it and lift it alone the baby wouldn't turn into a savage, it will come to goodness and riotousness by itself if its not corrupted. It wouldn't start eating another human if when it grow up and you showed him one, it would try to rape a female human etc. you it will not be bale to communicate and shit. But its not naturally going to be a savage is it now.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Muslim, you're posts are even stranger then mine sometimes :-Z~

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I was thinking about it. This fucker said our ancestors were savages. When we were having a debate about race. What a shit argument to bring. I wanna learn more so next time, I see him am going to school him!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

You can't group Homo Sapiens and homo Habilis together, there is more than a million years of evolution between them. Habilis were not great hunters at all, they used rudimentary stone tools and were more scavengers than anything, they were also more ape like than Sapiens. BTW modern humans are Homo Sapiens.

Modern humans do all of those things. That they are killing themselves off is debatable, but not for the reasons stated above.

Nobody knows how savage Habilis may or may not have been. Habilis was East African so your following sentence is a non sequiteur, totally racist and absolutely ignorant in its closing statement.

Your banal stupidity challenges my intelligence. Listen to yourself... leave a baby in the jungle... kick it off a roof and forget it and it will grow up to be good and righteous... what the fuck? The baby will die nincompoop, unless of course it grows up to be Tarzan.

You've got serious issues man.

 

What does it mean to be savage? I think it's a derogatory term used for anyone not a member of white European civilization. Our ancestors were obviously smarter than your average bear and highly inventive, as well as effective hunters.

 

I was speaking hypothetically.

 

Negros are savage? Let's talk about Arabs. They're like Jews with bloodlust and smaller brains.

 

Jews don't have bloodlust? Puh-leeze. They're just too sophisticated for overt violence.

 

Cackling while perched upon piles of their Jew gold hardly counts as the sort of bloodlust scimitar-wielding, goat-fucking, dirty, homeless Arabs enjoy.

Though Jews do like a good baby everynow and then. But then, who doesn't like kneading an infant into bread dough?

 

Come, now. How could you mention the babies and miss the obvious? Sure the Towelheads scream and shoot their AK-47s into the air and chuck their little pieces of rubble that came from their bulldozed Palestinian homes at passers by more, but the Jews git'r done! Think of all the unborn infants killed by their Hollywood politics and media conspiracies. They know what they're doing! It's not the same, granted, but I'd say it's better. More effective.

 

But the cold calculating stare isn't one of bloodlust, it's of tiny dollar signs, being added up and converted to gold. Their short-sightedness also causes them to squint past their massive noses, which could be confused with bloodlust, I guess.

 

Maybe that's it. It is rather difficult to tell.

 

If we keep this up, James is gonna ban our chiseled, Aryan physiques. He's probably in league with those zionists, anyway.

 

Isn't baum a Jew (agnostic)? Or am I confusing you with someone else?

 

I recently met a Mormon professor. He reminded me very strongly of my experiences in Saudi Arabia. What is the status of women in Mormons?

 

I am only 50% Jewish. My mother is a wetback.

 

I've always thought the mother has a greater influence on children than the father (with some notable exceptions). By my calculations you are less than 50% Jewish.

 

I get an F either way. I still get illuminatus-cred for being descended from conquistadores though, right?

 

Oh god. Mormons are horrible. If you want to read a book that is long and emotionally grueling, detailing the horrible things Americans like to do to women in the name of a made up religion, go check out Under the Banner of Heaven by John Krakauer.

A lot of Mormons are really family oriented and can be great. I've known some really great Mormons. Unfortunately, their church gives them a lot of authority to abuse women, if they feel so inclined.

There are Mormons outside of the Church of Latter Day Saints, which is The Church, capitals, who regularly practice polygamy. All women are for are breeding with, and all sex is for the purpose of procreation. So it's good to keep your women living in different houses so they don't all go on the same menstural cycle.

Then there's raping 14 year-old stepdaughters, forcing them to marry you, and siring multiple children (which you will marry off at 14 to your gross oldman buddies) before they hit 16.