Lies and no sex

Q has told a blatant lie accusing me of flaming his thread which he has now locked. I have a copy of the exact post here it is:

Note, if you check that thread, I compliment the Philica site, I said this:

"
http://philica.com/display_article.php?article_id=13

very useful site

"The belief that the Big Bang produced EMR is more an assumption than a provable fact. Supposedly, during the first microsecond of the existence of the Universe, there were hadrons, followed within a second by electrons, positrons, photons, and (maybe) neutrinos."

But then you called me stupid for saying neutrinos were possibly involved in the big bang, so this guy is too yes? "


the following post was in response to him contradicting that compliment.

This was the post Q deleted, threatened me with a ban over and locked the thread over:

This site Philica

apparantly kooks and idiots get declared 'proven accademics' and contribute there?

How great can it be, how reliable are the contributers?

According to philica this chap Q doesn't like is 'proven accademic'?

Is the site not that great Q?"

so bearing in mind I said the Philica site was good and we are allowed to disagree anyway, where is the flame?

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

regretting the reputation you have built for yourself?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

(and yes, that was a flame =] )

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

"Lies and no sex "

Lmao.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

well I was thinking of huge scandal, 'Lies sex and videotape', but there was no sex and no video tape and the words 'copy and paste' did not have the same ring?

 

his obsession of bothering you is unbecoming.

he should focus more on members such as myself, who add no useful content to the site in any way, shape, or form.

 

yeah, just when you think I have forgotten and gone back to lurking the tech/physics threads, I pop up and dish a nice burn.

I just like to remind people that I don't like pointless threads, thats all. I am just an old curmudgeon =]

 

Yes, I was just about to say that. You and a couple of others spend all your time here pissing about, posting stupid pictures and talking foreign.

This is a sciforum. It's a bit like a library study area, full of nerds coughing and reading books, but the books are on a glass screen.

You would do well to remember that.

 

and you would do well to remember this:

*flips you off*

oooooooh...you got SERVED!!!

 

Here is an example of the kind of stupid thing you post when you should be discussing inverse Cro-Magnon ratios, or something equally clever:

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

Grow up.
​

 

never.

do you not see the folly of pretending to be more important than we actually are, just because of the title of a webpage we all happen to frequent?

people take themselves too seriously here.

 

honestly, if the moderators (the only folks i care about not pissing off) have a problem with my happy go lucky posting style, they have never indicated it to me.

with the exception of (Q), i have never had a rude word said to me about the way i post.

 

Yes I know, but surely there's limited value in posting things like this, when the rest of us are busy having animated discussions about gravitational wave interferometers?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

​

 

the value of that photo is nearly unlimited.

i have already thought of five or so things that i could do while gazing at it's majesty.

2 of the things involve hand lotion, and the other 3 or so involve my cat, a garden rake, and 20 golf balls.