who here in sciforums would like to see more moderators, porfiry has said that we dont need more but many people here have stated that they want new moderators. note: this is only a debate as to whether we need more/new moderators not who you want to see as a moderator
It was quite bad some recent time ago, but it seems that the situation has normalised. Don't think we need new mods atm, but maybe we should appoint some so that we are ready if shit happens (and it will). Anyway, we can talk all we want, but Porfiry has the last word in this.
i was refuting your above statement. i dont know dave, but i was willing to give him money in order to keep this site up.
I have also donated. I'd say we don't need new moderators right now, but in the future we may, so one more mod couldn't hurt. It would certainly decrease James Rs workload.
actually, with that one sentence, i put your statement to rest. not to mention the several members that confirmed their willingness to donate money to some guy they dont know.
im not going to argue with you, just because you want to. however much you want it to be, i will never be your "new drama". get a new gimmick.
I think we most definately need more moderation. Not like IIDB's North Korea style dictatorship (they just killed my sockpuppet! Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image! )but enough moderation to get rid of all the armchair racists here. We need fumagation.
Unlike me and many others you're always consistent and balanced in your reactions, even to racist aggressive troll types! A true strength of character and a testament to patience! I wouldn't be a good candidate. I would immediately abuse my power and go after rightwingers. Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!