no war for oil !!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by angrybellsprout, Jan 23, 2006.

  1. angrybellsprout paultard since 2002 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,251
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. cato less hate, more science Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,959
    your point being...?
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. Facial Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,225
    Oh, I see where those projects lead to...
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. angrybellsprout paultard since 2002 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,251
    Not really that hard to read the map, eh?
     
  8. Mosheh Thezion Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,650
    TO LATE.... the war is over.

    -MT
     
  9. angrybellsprout paultard since 2002 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,251
    It is over?

    Must explain why we currently have troops stationed there?

    Then again where were the dipshit protestors for that one?

    Where was the mass media campaign?

    Oh that's right, it is fine to invade countries that have never attacked us, and have key strategic elements to the world oil market, just as long as the president in charge of such an invasion is a democrat.
     
  10. Mosheh Thezion Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,650
    IM NOT a democrat... first of all.

    it is over... we are just doing police work now.

    what you should concern yourself about.. is the next war.

    -MT
     
  11. mikasa11 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    258
    Do you have any fucking idea how hypocrital this statement is? Have you ever heard of Iraq?
     
  12. mikasa11 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    258
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is."

    -Governor George W. Bush (R-TX)

    Shows who the real hypocrites are...
     
  13. Neildo Gone Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,306
    "You can support the troops but not the president."---Rep Tom Delay (R-TX)

    Hehe.

    - N
     
  14. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    ill do the second one.
    thanks for the permission, Inmate DeLay.
    heh.
     
  15. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Blaming Clinton again? Did he recieve any profits from Halliburton? Was he ever in the oil business? Did he reject the notion of cooperating with the UN?
     
  16. angrybellsprout paultard since 2002 Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    1,251
    So invading coutries that were of no threat to us but were key in the world oil market is a good thing?

    Maybe more of our presidents should try doing it?
     
  17. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    they already are, angrybellsprout.
     
  18. spidergoat pubic diorama Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    54,036
    Limited humanitarian missions with cooperation of the UN are acceptable. There was an exit plan, very few American casualties, and no delusions of empire.
     
  19. The Devil Inside Banned Banned

    Messages:
    8,213
    indeed.
    at least clinton didnt give the entire u.n. the finger when he disagreed with them.
     

Share This Page