Ban invert_nexus

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by TruthSeeker, Mar 21, 2005.

?

Ban invert_nexus?

  1. Yes, ban him permanently

    2 vote(s)
    50.0%

  2. Yes, but only for a while

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%

  3. No

    1 vote(s)
    25.0%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 1 of 2
  1. TruthSeeker

    TruthSeeker Fancy Virtual Reality Monkey Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,162
    Well, he is spamming in my threads with irrelevant comments, he rarely replies to the subject and when he does, instead of presenting an argument he simply says "I'm right, you are wrong, and that's it". Not to mention trying desperately to insult me. It's a ridiculous waste of time to ever answer to him, and it wastes space in my threads.

    Ban him, please, even if it is for a few days. Hopefully he will learn from it not to spam like that.

    Just a few examples:
    http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=786811#post786811
    http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=786815#post786815
    http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=45677
     
    TruthSeeker, Mar 21, 2005
    #1

  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. invert_nexus

    invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Wow.
    This is interesting.
    Bye, Truthseeker.
     
    invert_nexus, Mar 21, 2005
    #2

  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. invert_nexus

    invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    I guess I'll add a token defense.

    One thread that he links is not 'his' thread. His argument was rather inane and I quashed him rather soundly. His only problem is that he refused to accept it.

    The other two were duplicate threads and my only purpose was to point this out and to provide links to the original threads. I was done but he just kept responding to me again and again. He didn't respond to anyone but me, in fact. Is it spamming if I'm only answering a direct response from the thread starter?

    Anyone can read the threads and see who is desperate to insult who.
    Whose arguments are logically based and which are just random words thrown together.
    Its rather clear and I see no need to point out the obvious.

    (Truthseeker. Don't answer me. My original posts didn't require an answer.)
     
    invert_nexus, Mar 21, 2005
    #3

  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. TruthSeeker

    TruthSeeker Fancy Virtual Reality Monkey Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    15,162
    No, you refused to accept that the argument was obvious and then you started trying to insult me and distract from the argument.

    Oh. So it just happened to be me, like...right after the other thread. You are just polluting my threads.

    Yes, because you are taking a whole lot of space from my threads, spamming everywhere. I'm trying to stop that before you go to ALL my threads.

    It is if it is irrelevant. If you were answering to the actual subject, it would have been more relevant, you know

    I say the same...

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Translation: let me talk all by myself so that I can "prove" my point and save myself from being banned.


    No seriously.... go and get some holidays out of here....
     
    TruthSeeker, Mar 21, 2005
    #4
  8. invert_nexus

    invert_nexus Ze do caixao Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,686
    Hee hee.

    First of all, Truthseeker. I wonder if you know that it is not proper to start ban threads? In fact, people have been banned permanently for starting ban threads.
    Just a FYI.

    Second.
    Ha!

    Ha! Ha!
    I destroyed every argument you made in that thread. Everytime that I explicitly showed you how I did so, you either just dropped the subject and started another or you started going on about Jack Layton.
    You insulted me, by the way. I think I was rather nice in that thread.

    Uh. Yes.
    You just so happened to post two duplicate threads. Both of which I knew were duplicate threads. You also posted other threads which I didn't have anything to do with. Correct? So. Is it that I'm 'polluting' your threads? Or is it that I saw two threads which I pointed out as duplicates?

    To paraphrase the Fetus from long ago. You're on the slippery slope, bud.

    I respond only to comments directed at me. Other than my first posts which merely stated that they were duplicates and posted links.

    So. You're spamming your own threads then, right? Because you became obsessed with me and ignored the topics after my simple pointing out that they were duplicates.

    Of course you do.

    No. Translation. My original posts in your threads required no answer. They were simply pointing out that your threads were duplicates. You responded to them and I responded to your responses.

    I'm not really worried about being banned, Truthseeker. You should be worried though.

    But you shouldn't mind being banned since you're so busy anyway, right?

    (By the way, I haven't voted. There's no need as this thread is going to be closed soon enough anyway.)
     
    invert_nexus, Mar 21, 2005
    #5
  9. -Bob-

    -Bob- Insipid Fool Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    296
    I voted, 'ban him for a little while' cuz I think that would be fun.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    -Bob-, Mar 21, 2005
    #6
  10. -Bob-

    -Bob- Insipid Fool Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    296
    BTW I'm only posting here cuz I know this thread is just filling up the 'Open government' section with useless bullshit!!!!

    !!!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    -Bob-, Mar 21, 2005
    #7
  11. water

    water the sea Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,442
    Oh my.
     
    water, Mar 21, 2005
    #8
  12. wesmorris

    wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    May bannination ensue (of the thread starter of course, for starting a ban thread).
     
    wesmorris, Mar 21, 2005
    #9
  13. §outh§tar

    §outh§tar is feeling caustic Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,832
    TruthSeeker, as best as invert_nexus can tell, is a fucking moron. He should be banned for not following simple procedure.

    Good call wesmorris.
     
    §outh§tar, Mar 21, 2005
    #10
  14. wesmorris

    wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    I still voted yes, just because I love to ban people. Luckily, my vote doesn't count (nor does yours). It's a beautiful thing.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    We can use this as a rebirth for invert. Let's talk to him like a newb. He's been through the fires of bannination and is reborn invert_maximus!

    Welcome to sciforums maximus.
     
    wesmorris, Mar 21, 2005
    #11
  15. water

    water the sea Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,442
    TruthSeeker,

    You really are a poor, poor dude.
    Ignorantia legis neminem excusat.

    You could have spared yourself the humiliation and simply start an "I hate invert_nexus" thread. But you just don't have the ... hm ... pellets for it. Yes, not even that.
     
    water, Mar 21, 2005
    #12
  16. Roman

    Roman Banned Banned

    Messages:
    11,560
    Invert,
    you had an opportune moment here to tell TruthSeeker he was wrong, you were right, and then insult him.

    Here, I'll even do it for you.

    TruthSeeker,
    the simple matter is that you're wrong and Invert's right. Now go cry yourself to sleep, pussy.
     
    Roman, Mar 21, 2005
    #13
  17. -Bob-

    -Bob- Insipid Fool Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    296
    I think I will call him Invert_Sexus from now on.

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!


    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    Fuck this limit on smilies.

    Ill find a way to outsmart you bastards.
     
    -Bob-, Mar 21, 2005
    #14
  18. wesmorris

    wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    As far as I can tell, invert_nexus is right on the money! So is water.

    Why thenku!
     
    wesmorris, Mar 21, 2005
    #15
  19. wesmorris

    wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    wesmorris, Mar 21, 2005
    #16
  20. -Bob-

    -Bob- Insipid Fool Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    296
    -Bob-, Mar 21, 2005
    #17
  21. wesmorris

    wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    I see your ridiculous smilies, and double your bet:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    I raise you one dimension:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    wesmorris, Mar 21, 2005
    #18
  22. wesmorris

    wesmorris Nerd Overlord - we(s):1 of N Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    9,846
    And one for the thread starter:

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

     
    wesmorris, Mar 21, 2005
    #19
  23. duendy

    duendy Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    6,585
    well truthseeker...i feel your hurt. i dont like banning. the reason this place is cool is i am not aware of banning or heavy moderation.
    things that i have heard would me much more admissable for the banning but i dont like it, i like freedom. theres always a way to swing with someone, even angry, hopefully witty and/or insightful jives. learn from yor pissedoffedness
     
    duendy, Mar 21, 2005
    #20
Page 1 of 2
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page