JamesR is abusing his power as moderator

Discussion in 'SF Open Government' started by neoclassical, Oct 12, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. neoclassical

    neoclassical Banned Banned

    Messages:
    135
    He claimed that a site mentioned in an article I posted "endorsed illegal acts."

    I then posted a news article disproving his claim.

    Thread still locked, all mention deleted. It seems likely that he is enforcing his religious bias on SciForums members

    Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!



    :m:
     
    neoclassical, Oct 12, 2004
    #1

  2. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. Athelwulf

    Athelwulf Rest in peace Kurt... Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    5,060
    Do ya have evidence that I can look at, so I can make my own judgement?
     
    Athelwulf, Oct 12, 2004
    #2

  4. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. ElectricFetus

    ElectricFetus Sanity going, going, gone Valued Senior Member

    Messages:
    18,523
    welcome neoclassical,

    This thread I think would be better for site feedback, as in SF Open Government is meant for legislation like "impeach (moderater name Here)"

    By the way could you give us a little more detail about what happend?
     
    ElectricFetus, Oct 12, 2004
    #3

  6. Guest Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. robtex

    robtex Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    582
    neo isn't there a white supremest meeting you are late for? where is the nazi forum that you came from so we can clog up there forum with useless posts like yours?
     
    robtex, Oct 12, 2004
    #4
  8. James R

    James R Just this guy, you know? Staff Member

    Messages:
    39,421
    The thread in question is titled "Christians attempt to censor opposition". It is in the Religion forum. I am not going to link to it.

    I have not deleted the thread. I did, however, lock it, because it was inciting violence against Christians.

    The thread is in contravention of the forum rules. I could have simply deleted it, but I chose to leave it here. If people want to look at it (it is a hate site, essentially), they can search and find it easily enough. I will not allow the Religion forum be used to promote this kind of thing.

    Let me make it quite clear that the thread was not locked because it was anti-Christian. If it had been anti-Muslim or anti-atheist, it would equally have been locked. It is the fact that it advocates violent, criminal acts which resulted in its being closed.

    The "news article" neoclassical refers to above is an opinion piece. It proves nothing. It offers an opinion, and they are a dime a dozen, as we all know.

    neoclassical is simply peeved that he hasn't been allowed to propagate his hate here.
     
    James R, Oct 12, 2004
    #5
  9. philocrazy

    philocrazy Banned Banned

    Messages:
    234
    james r:
    It is the fact that it advocates violent, criminal acts which resulted in its being closed.
    -------------------------------------------------------
    i absolutely agree with james r on that point,gentlemen
     
    philocrazy, Oct 12, 2004
    #6
  10. philocrazy

    philocrazy Banned Banned

    Messages:
    234
    criminals violence and criminal acts have no place at sciforums
    because i am not here to fight,if i was you'd be welcomed
    you're still welcomed to fight my intellegence if you wish
    i am a big criminal in intellegence and big warrior in battle
    hahahaha nice joke huh?
    james r kick ass man kick ass!!!!!!when violence is mentioned
    kick assssssssssssssss!!!!!!!!!!!
    nicer joke huh?
    no more free jokes for today!!!
    philocrazy is not charity i dont need your money!
    want anotherone?
    pay up!
    i told you im a criminal in intellegence!!!!
    ok no more,no more!!!!!!

    Philosopher Philocrazy
     
    philocrazy, Oct 12, 2004
    #7
  11. Porfiry

    Porfiry Nomad Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    4,127
    neoclassical, you are a nutcase. Stop wasting our time.
     
    Porfiry, Oct 12, 2004
    #8
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page