BAN undecided

showing his extremeness , when proved wrong.

height of extremeness and partiality

openly becoming racist

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

be a good idea to stick a poll on this.... its sort of the rules for banning people.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

have you made this thread twice, cause thats silly.
(30303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030)

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Do you comprehend that deserving a seat does not mean you get one…hello…is there a f***ing brain in that head or is it located in your phallus complex?

Alas I did not call you anything I was asking you a question. You called me a fucking idiot, also F***ing could mean anything, facking I could have said that how do you know? So no I didn’t saying thing here that can be said that is an insult. Nice try though.

Are you still around? I'll make sure you aren't.

That is not enough to get me banned, and by the looks of it I am getting rid of you.

I wouldn’t laugh so much because if it wasn’t for that forest all you Indians with humanity would probably die from a lack of oxygen.

What racism? I said that we would all die, I just said Indian to reinforce the point for you. No racism here, try again.

 

Do you comprehend that deserving a seat does not mean you get one…hello…is there a f***ing brain in that head or is it located in your phallus complex?

Alas I did not call you anything I was asking you a question. You called me a fucking idiot, also F***ing could mean anything, facking I could have said that how do you know? So no I didn’t saying thing here that can be said that is an insult. Nice try though.

Are you still around? I'll make sure you aren't.

That is not enough to get me banned, and by the looks of it I am getting rid of you.

I wouldn’t laugh so much because if it wasn’t for that forest all you Indians with humanity would probably die from a lack of oxygen.

What racism? I said that we would all die, I just said Indian to reinforce the point for you. No racism here, try again.

 

Undecided has his personality and arguing style weaknesses but he is not worthy of banishment, at least not yet.

rahul_sharma,

Please show me the links to those posts.

 

oooooohhh do u want to BAN the heart of sci???!!!!

poooor Indian simply u CANT

 

mr. WellCookedFetus cannt u read this “ Do you comprehend that deserving a seat does not mean you get one…hello…is there a f***ing brain in that head or is it located in your phallus complex? ” , send by this guy ....in a same forum where u just visited :m:

 

Show me the insult please?

 

rahal sharma has 74 posts and undecided has near 4000,that means hes spent enough time here to gain respect.

After only being here for a little while do you think you have the right to ask about banning people?

Calm down,sit down to a nice large vindaloo and papadoms,cup of assam tea and you might feel better.

It might not work for you but when i do that i cant go on sciforums at all cos i spend the rest of the day on the toilet.

 

I think it is this time of the month again, do I hear the mob shouting "BAN, BAN, BAN...!" again?

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I most certainly don't agree with Undecided all the time, but he's a good poster.

 

Ok youve posted this twice,i reckon everyone should vote YES on this one and NO on the other one.

 

Well, I suppose it exists twice because this one has no poll...

 

That is most unfortunate.

 

Ahhh, Rahul Sharma, welcome to sciforums, one of the most open and controversial discussion sites on the web. Perhaps the Guardian online forum in the UK is more open and less moderated, but sciforums beats it for sheer diversity. I am afriad that using your criteria at least 50% of the posters here should be banned. I suggest that you either live with it or go elsewhere.

 

i agree with Guthrie,dont ask for members to be banned,either live with it,or go to more
moderated forums such as philosophyforums.com for example

philosopher philocrazy

 

chaos is humanity too you know


Philosopher Philocrazy

 

Nono, absolutely no. This was discussed so many times before! Why do we keep coming back to the same issues?