View Full Version : Vote For Co-Mod Of WE&P
goofyfish
06-28-04, 05:06 PM
Multiple choice is not available.
hotsexyangelprincess
06-28-04, 05:24 PM
i would like to run
sargentlard
06-28-04, 05:56 PM
No it isn't Goofyfish. I tried to vote for me and someone else...didn't work. Is that maybe because I am a candidate?
VOTE FOR ME.....I don't need to campaign because we all hate politics and its practicioners as it is. If you are voting for me then you know who I am and how I work so I thank you for your vote. If you do not know who I am then chances are you're fairly new to the site so VOTE for me regardless.
Arditezza
06-28-04, 05:57 PM
Run, Forest. Run!
Sorry. Just couldn't resist.
certified psycho
06-28-04, 06:00 PM
It is so hard to choose.Arrrggggggggh............
rejuvenate the forums! bring in fresh new blood
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 06:15 PM
Vote for me!
If I’m elected I will promise fair and neutral treatment.
- If elected I will ask members what the rules should be rather then implement my own rules!, I beleive in making this a very open goverment
- Insulting or flaming will be dealt with by editing not deleting post, deleting post is simple against my character and I will try to not do it, ever!
- I will explain why I did what ever I do. You will not be left in the dark about any editing or moderating I do.
- You may complain to me about any problem without fear of angering me or lack of response.
in with the new! out with the old!
gendanken
06-28-04, 06:50 PM
Wellcookeddfetus has my vote.
(and remember this, man. You linked me to this page to vote and it will be held over you)
hotsexyangelprincess
06-28-04, 06:53 PM
Can we edit it to add me? :m:
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 07:07 PM
gendanken,
Do a favor for me I do a favor for you. Its just basic selfish genetics man, all life abides by it. :)
gendanken
06-28-04, 08:21 PM
Hotandsexybullshit:
Can we edit it to add me?
No.
"hotsexyangelprincess" is your downfall.
*flush*
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 08:26 PM
but I like her name, if she matched up with a pornographic avatar she would be the bomb! still would not vote for her though, don't know what kind of person she is... maybe a he. :eek:
gendanken
06-28-04, 08:46 PM
Fetus:
but I like her name,
You
if she matched up with a pornographic avatar
Need
she would be the bomb!
To
still would not vote for her though,
Quit
don't know what kind of person she is...
Jacking off
maybe a he
To cheap porn.
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 08:50 PM
Free porn to be exact. :D
Dr Lou Natic
06-28-04, 08:52 PM
I voted for fetus, and I urge all others to do the same.
wcf
get realistic.
first thing you new appointees should do is go backstage and have a chat with the goofball. listen to him. he has the experience. you have new ideas? discuss. what is most important is teamwork and a consistent policy
so, ease up on the promises
CounslerCoffee
06-28-04, 09:40 PM
As PREVIOUS mod of WE&P, I endorse Sarge.
CounslerCoffee
06-28-04, 09:42 PM
wcf
get realistic.
first thing you new appointees should do is go backstage and have a chat with the goofball. listen to him. he has the experience. you have new ideas? discuss. what is most important is teamwork and a consistent policy
so, ease up on the promises
Hathor is correct.
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 09:43 PM
Hathor and CounslerCoffee,
I don't think Goofyfish has a problem with my terms, I have discused them with him before. Also there are not much promises up there, I'm open to others ideas on rules and moderation that does not mean I need to do them. All I'm pormising there is that I will listen. And I have already discused with Goofyfish several months ago on why I would edit a post over deleting it.
CounslerCoffee
06-28-04, 09:46 PM
I don't think Goofyfish has a problem with my terms, I have discused them with him before. Also there are not much promises up there, I'm open to others ideas on rules and moderation that does not mean I need to do them.
Then you have nothing to worry about.
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 09:56 PM
Yes I do have to worry: having a existing and respected moderator like you leaving any bad press against me like agreeing with Hathor up there before allow me to explain my self, lowers the already low chances I have against Tiassa who I guarantee you all will win or come close to winning by the time this is all over. After the last 3 elections it's not hard to believe that already existing moderators sure have an advantage in elections.
CounslerCoffee
06-28-04, 10:13 PM
No, there is one reason why I did not endorse Tiassa. Tiassa, while a great poster, and a good mod, is still a mod. I believe that new blood is needed. I resigned because I no longer have the time, and I have a busy life full of friends, and half the time I log onto sciforums I'm drunk. Hell, I've been drinking right now and it's Monday night. Can you imagine how I feel on Friday night?
New blood is needed, I believe it. It needs to be you or Sarge. And I have endorsed Sarge because he's a friend. I wish you luck.
(Yeah, that's right; I edited posts and deleted threads and did other things while drunk. Deal with that sciforums. I WAS DRUNK WITH POWER! And beer.)
thefountainhed
06-28-04, 10:14 PM
Undecided has a mere 2 votes, including mine? Do you people have a meat grinder gnawing away the little pieces of what promised to be a working brain?
I cannot fully express my distaste of this nonsense about VOTING for a fucing moderator, because the more I think about it, the more annoyed I get. That a nitwit like CounslerCoffee, who nows zip about Politics and World Events in the first place, whose imaginary foot up the ass gets deeper with every critique of Bush and his cowarts was even the fucking moderator in the first bloody place!!!
Gah!
Anyway, you should vote for Undecided because he is the most knowlegeable amongst the four nominees, offers a counter balance to goofy, contributes the most to the subforum, and is not sucking your proverbial dicks for a vote.
Thus, it is not a power trip.
CounslerCoffee
06-28-04, 10:23 PM
. That a nitwit like CounslerCoffee, who nows zip about Politics and World Events in the first place, whose imaginary foot up the ass gets deeper with every critique of Bush and his cowarts was even the fucking moderator in the first bloody place!!!
I might not be as well versed in WE&P as Undecided, but that was my main argument. An unbiased mod was needed, and I think I proved to be just that. I didn't care which way or the other, so why would I be bias?
I won that election because I kick ass.
CounslerCoffee
06-28-04, 10:26 PM
Multiple choice is available.
No it's not.
while undecided rules, he is in way too deep over at wep
he most likely will be a divisive figure thru no real fault on his part
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 10:32 PM
thefountainhed,
We need a moderator to be neutral and fair. Now elected a politically knowledgeable moderator that going to get him self into the discussions and arguments is not good, he will end up protecting one side over another, or at least people will claim that’s what he’s doing. A moderator simple sit back like a referee, it does not play on the court. The only thing needed knowledgeable is a good understanding of argument fallacies, and I’m stuffed full of that!
sargentlard
06-28-04, 10:33 PM
We need a moderator to be neutral and fair. Now elected a politically knowledgeable moderator that going to get him self into the discussions and arguments is not good, he will end up protecting one side over another, or at least people will claim that?s what he?s doing. A moderator simple sit back like a referee, it does not play on the court. The only thing needed knowledgeable is a good understanding of argument fallacies, and I?m stuffed full of that!
WELL...to be fair every running candidate on this election is.
Face it people..every one of us 4 is qualified, it all comes down to who the voter likes and prefers. Happy voting.
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 10:37 PM
sargentlard,
Not Undecided hes to into politics, he will be bias or be pointed at as bias, and Tiassa is already a moderator. That leave you and me.
CounslerCoffee
06-28-04, 10:38 PM
thefountainhed, you make me laugh! Your ranting and obvious BIAS of this entire situation is hilarious! Please continue with why you hate me, and why Undecided is a better human being.
P.S. I love Bush! Vote Bush! And Ann Coulter is my girlfriend! LOL!!!!!111one
I have to agree with Hathor on this. I don't think Undecided could be impartial on every topic when he moderates because he has a perchant to be so emotional about certain topics. Sorry Undecided... :(
Sarge got my vote.
sargentlard
06-28-04, 10:44 PM
sargentlard,
Not Undecided hes to into politics, he will be bias or be pointed at as bias, and Tiassa is already a moderator. That leave you and me.
Actually...its a crazy notion but no. As blatant a politics head he is Undecided has shown time and time again to be the only real one to show constraints in WE&P. His only problem is that he loses credibility when someone incites him and he will die defending his POV.
He wouldn't be as bad as some of us are making him out to be.
But I am a whore so VOTE FOR ME.
ElectricFetus
06-28-04, 10:44 PM
Ok, so someone can say that at the Berlin Conference of 1884, the british women were made to provide blow jobs to all the french at the conference for control of what became Nigeria. Your lack of knowledge therefore allows that the statement stays?
If that statement was made I would ask the poster to reference it because I find that rather hard to believe. Even if a knowledgeable moderator saw that statement they would need to ask for reference to disprove that as all they could say is that they have no knowledge of such a event happening.
My my... this is all becoming very Clintonesque. Next we're going to start seeing statements of "I did not have sex with that woman"...
sargentlard
06-28-04, 11:13 PM
"I did not have sex with that woman"...
I never denied that. I did..all night long..yup..4 seconds of fumbling and 8 following hrs of awkward silence.
cc
how come you like the hed and hate me?
why cc why?
*dang! it's gonna get radioactive in here again
So Sarge, can we expect that you hand over your blue dress as evidence?
CounslerCoffee
06-28-04, 11:21 PM
Hathor, I don't hate you. I really don't.
Love...
Exciting and new..
Come aboard..
We're expecting youuuuuuuuuuu....
The LOVEEE Sciforums... (istead of boat ;) )
:D
Sorry couldn't resist...
And now I'm deeply disturbed that I remembered the lyrics to that song... :eek:
The Sargentlard of Champions.
Top Breeders Recommend Sargentlard.
8 out of 10 Owners who Expressed a Preference said Their Cats Preferred Sargentlard
goofyfish
06-28-04, 11:58 PM
... we get the idea. ;)
James R
06-29-04, 12:48 AM
I haven't decided who to vote for yet. Would the candidates like to make policy speeches?
§outh§tar
06-29-04, 12:56 AM
Bow down to tyranny! Undecided for mod!
;)
Dreamwalker
06-29-04, 05:36 AM
Was a hard choice between Sarge and WCF, but I think that Sarge would be better....arrrrr, can´t resist the man boobies....
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 07:47 AM
So basically a man with no campaign can get this much appeal simply by shear popularity? I mean what is his strategy of moderation if he is elected? Do man boobies basically speak for them selves???
James R,
I think I was the only one that did (page 1) here let me repost it for you
If I’m elected I will promise fair and neutral treatment.
- If elected I will ask members what the rules should be rather then implement my own rules!, I beleive in making this a very open goverment
- Insulting or flaming will be dealt with by editing not deleting post, deleting post is simple against my character and I will try to not do it, ever!
- I will explain why I did what ever I do. You will not be left in the dark about any editing or moderating I do.
- You may complain to me about any problem without fear of angering me or lack of response.
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 07:56 AM
Hathor,
Hey I should do that to:
Vote for the fetus, because he burned for your sins!
Vote for the lesser of four evils, vote fetus.
Vote Fetus or else he will gum you to death!
The fetus loves you, lets get sexy with the fetus! vote fetus
Sorry I should have done that under a psuedoname like you did.
Sorry I should have done that under a psuedoname like you did.
No, you should have used less bright colours. Do you wish to attract the attention of the voters or blind them?:eek:
Christ I can still see that yellow and green writing even when I close my eyes. :(
:p
it's a tie, if I put my vote up for sale on ebay, will there be any buyers :)
Arditezza
06-29-04, 12:36 PM
I am voting on the waffle factor. WCF changes his mind more times in a day then you all change your underwear in a month. Sargentlards spine seems to be a bit stronger.
(it'd have to be to support those man boobies. Two words man... breast reduction)
Sargent has my vote.
paulsamuel
06-29-04, 02:50 PM
wcf
get realistic.
first thing you new appointees should do is go backstage and have a chat with the goofball. listen to him. he has the experience. you have new ideas? discuss. what is most important is teamwork and a consistent policy
so, ease up on the promises
ya, fetus is full of it, and he's full of himself.
i strongly urge all not to vote for him.
remember, if he becomes moderator, you'll never be able to use the ignore function on him and fetus is one of the most deserved of that function.
sargentlard
06-29-04, 03:08 PM
So basically a man with no campaign can get this much appeal simply by shear popularity?
No...apprently I must have shown some signs of competence along the way.
I mean what is his strategy of moderation if he is elected?
There is no strategy, no promises, no agendas.....its simple maintenence. Those who go out of line are give na polite PM to watch their ways of communication and post a warning in a hot thread that it is being watched by a mod so keep on topic.
Goofyfish has kept the fort down nice so far, i am not here to override his methods but to only ease his work. I really get no pleasure out of campaigning.
Do man boobies basically speak for them selves???
Yes they do.
“Do man boobies basically speak for them selves???”
Yes they do.
so what do they say
Q: To the voters:
I been wonding, in a thread like this, where X people are running for something.
Do you, as a voter, actually buy/belive whatever crap those running throws at us in there "campains" or do you skip on to next post?
My answer: most of the time it's just the same generic lala, its rare to see something new and creative.
sargentlard
06-29-04, 03:49 PM
so what do they say
VOTE FOR ME...duh. I am not telling people to expect miracles. The unpleasent taste that might linger in a posters mouth from WE&P will come from fellow posters disagreement. Only thing I can do is see that mutual disagreement is rested on mature terms...not bashing of each others characters when all gloves are off.
I am expecting that the posters are more "grown up" in WE&P then we give them credit for because on every board I have seen politics seems to be the one issue that gets the best of anyone. If not then be prepared to be neutured of your ill will mouth. If one plans to say why another is a moron or make other personal attacks then back it up or your snide comment(s) will be deleted from your post.
My answer: most of the time it's just the same generic lala, its rare to see something new and creative.
Oh yeah. Hence me not like campaigning, but people like the status quo of professional speeches while complaining how useless and mundane they are.
It a simple case of you're dammned if you do and you're dammned if you don't. So I must state the obvious practices that will be put into effect upon my victory (if there is a one) out of courtesy and for bare bones advertisement.
everneo
06-29-04, 05:48 PM
Since you seem to suffer from constipation, you are fit for P&WE moderation. I voted for you, remember it has nothing to do with your boobs.
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 06:00 PM
There is no strategy, no promises, no agendas.....its simple maintenence. Those who go out of line are give na polite PM to watch their ways of communication and post a warning in a hot thread that it is being watched by a mod so keep on topic.
Goofyfish has kept the fort down nice so far, i am not here to override his methods but to only ease his work. I really get no pleasure out of campaigning.
Who said I would politely PM anyone? I'm not overriding Goofyfish, aside for trying not to delete post there is not going to be any diffidence in moderation. By editing the post instead of deleting I can tell everyone what happened so the violator and others can learn not to do it again. I have already speaking with goofyfish about this before and he had no problem with it. If people want rules changed their going to have the ask me and I'm going to have to get permission from goofyfish. I promise to listen and ask, changing it is a different matter.
Hey I don't enjoy campaigning any more then you do trust me.
spooking with goofyfish (wcf)
heh
give the warpig bush a run for his money, eh?
henceforth, this shit will be known as fetusism.
This Is Not Your Father's Sargentlard.
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 06:31 PM
oh so your going to make fun of my bad spell checker are you? Is that all you can come up against me?
i think i have the same spellchecker as WCF
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 06:40 PM
Lets all look up what is mature behavior here. Now lets see is using a psuedoname to campaign for you because you said you don’t want to campaign, mature behavior??? is it Hathor or Sargentlard?
elaborate
god i love a down and dirty campaign
hit em hard boys. do not step above the fray!
i insist that all get their hands dirty!
we wanna see what you losers are made of
extra!! extra!! breaking news
this just in. we sent a crew with hidden camera to investigate rumours of candidate fetus's membership in a private club. prepare yourself for a shocking glimpse of the fetus in drag!.
http://www.mit.edu/afs/athena.mit.edu/user/s/t/stanrost/www/photos/bday2000/yan-in-drag.jpg
this has been an exclusive from hathor's newswire
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 06:54 PM
Hey make fun of my spelling really pisses me off. At least my claim has real evidence:
Hathor
Registered User (236 posts) Yesterday, 10:48 PM
report | reply
When It Absolutely, Positively Has To Be Sargentlard Overnight.
vote for me!
Hathor
Registered User (236 posts) Yesterday, 10:51 PM
report | reply
The Sargentlard of Champions.
vote for me!
Hathor
Registered User (236 posts) Yesterday, 10:53 PM
report | reply
Top Breeders Recommend Sargentlard.
vote for me!
Why would Hathor say "vote for me?" we are not voting for him now are we. You should do a better job suppressing your multiple personalities.
i was wondering about that too
lemme edit. it doesnt make sense
extra!! extra!! breaking news
candidate fetus accuses his opponent, candidate sarge of dirty politics and mental instability!
sarge, how do you respond to this heinous charge? is it true that you are under investigation in this matter? what does your family think about this secret double life you have been leading?
our readers want to know..are you hathor?
this has been an exclusive from hathor's newswire
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 07:33 PM
i was wondering about that too
lemme edit. it doesnt make sense
Ok so what did it mean then? All you did was erase it.
... candidate sarge of dirty politics and mental instability!
Now when did I say that? If I wanted to I could us a psuedoname to spew propaganda for me, but I don't because of a maturity complex.
spidergoat
06-29-04, 07:49 PM
I voted for Tiassa, he's smart.... and undecided is too biased...Wellcookedfetus wants it too much, but looks cute in a dress;) ...and Seargentlard, if you don't change that avatar, I'm gonna puke.
i bet i could get the fetus so rattled that he goes into a meltdown
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 07:57 PM
who said I was angery? I like that dress :D
spidergoat,
what do I want thats too much?
alright fetus
enough of the jokes
you got me! you got me good.
i am the lard
what however? are you gonna do about it?
I ought to put in at least one appearance on my own behalf.
• How I moderate is established reasonably, I think, by the occasional forays into green ink (and purple before that) dotting the EM&J forum
• As some are fond of pointing out, I have heaps of time
• Also I think it's demonstrative that I tread more lightly where I have authority
And yes, by the time I get down to offering up that third point ... well, I'm not really offering much, am I?
(Hello, I am the Tiassa, and I approve this message.)
sargentlard
06-29-04, 08:08 PM
WCF
Ask Porfiry or Goofyfish (if he has the ability).......you doubt me and only they can prove you wrong. Nothing much I say could....ask them, go ahead. :)
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 08:18 PM
Hathor,
nothing, oh wait give me a second to get out my own psuedoname.
if this tie stay up maybe I could take one sub-forum and you take another, which one would you want? :)
ya there are 2 sub-forums here there should be 2 diffrent elected moderators.
sure I will apologies if they say its so.
sarge
yeah? aint you three jews? dont you guys stick together? and conspire? and whatnot?
wcf, its no use. appeal to a higher power.
it is really tiring to keep logging in and out
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 08:25 PM
Yes to be exact sargentlard and I are one, and we are also a group of rabies in New York that like to play in rocky horror.
george? george bush?
is that really you?
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 08:38 PM
Hey you’re the one broadcasting your one fox news channel you tell me?
hmmm
my cattle prod is out of juice
lemme get some eggs
sargentlard
06-29-04, 08:41 PM
Yes to be exact sargentlard and I are one, and we are also a group of rabies in New York that like to play in rocky horror.
You know what surprises me about you WCF...not the accusations because those are easily shot down by the administrators. I don't care about those.
What really surprises me is that anyone who has been here 1yr+ and knew who spookz was instantly recognized Hathor. You, who has been here longer than me, failed to do so. I am flabbergasted at what a dim bulb you turned out to be when it comes to reading people. To realize how spookz was such a playful bastard and how Hathor follows suit.
So for the record for those who aren't that slow: I am not Hathor nor do I care any other alias. I am too damn fine to separate myself into 2 aliases.
http://server6.uploadit.org/files/crappypics-plunger.jpg
If Only Everything in Life was as Reliable as a Sargentlard.
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 08:44 PM
sargentlard,
If I wanted to accuse you more I would have.
what do you think of the dual moderating idea back there?
paulsamuel,
That right you should stop, all you ever do when talking to me is argue over the littles things, it like your trying to make me your bitch, so I ask you to [deleted] try to have a good time here instead of getting in the face of others.
i installed fast user switching
*who here listens to hendrie? that man is a god!
sargentlard
06-29-04, 08:46 PM
Not bad fetus. You'll have to ask goofyfish. If the tie keeps up then why not. We're both competent and basically have the same ideas of moderating (I am sexier though) so why not ehh...faster moderating.
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 08:53 PM
Well I am cuter, look at me I'm like a cute bloody tampon. :D
And even then people can have access to 2 ip addresses at the same time, so no there will never be proof that you two are separate, but that does not mean I believe you are the same person, its just the comment by Hathor was a little weird. I should not take it against you, you would not be that stupid. We have been friends before lets not let this candidacy thing make us into jerks. If I am elected I will plead to goofyfish to let the runner up be given one of the sub-forums.
ElectricFetus
06-29-04, 09:03 PM
it feels like someone is trying to make a bitch out of you, if you want it then try going up against a guy that think he smart then you.
I seriously hope now that if elected people can still put me on ignore! paulsamuel should stop listen to me for his own good. Now I have something to be happy about if I lose, paulsamuel will hopefully ignore me!
That right you should stop, all you ever do when talking to me is argue over the littles things, it like your trying to make me your bitch, so I ask you to stop blowing cum up my ass and try to have a good time here instead of getting in the face of others.
Ugh. Charming. Now I only have to burn out my eyes to get rid of that mental picture:(.
The way you're biting back WCF, he's succeeded. You want me to pass you the toilet paper?
I am too damn fine to separate myself into 2 aliases.
Lardy... you da man! Now jiggle those manboobies and make the little tassles on the nipples twirl. ;)
I'd have said make those bells ring but that'd have been too kinky and frankly disturbing... :eek:
goofyfish
06-30-04, 07:08 AM
If I am elected I will plead to goofyfish to let the runner up be given one of the sub-forums.It's not up to me. In any case, the other two subs seldom need a mod. If they do, at some point, one will be chosen by a new vote.
:m: Peace.
ElectricFetus
06-30-04, 09:24 AM
But goofyfish World Events and Politics are 2 subforums, not one remember the spliting? So this is the voting for a moderator for both of these subforums right, if so that is why I thought 2 diffrent people would need to be elected, one for each subforum.
I might have provided a bad mental image up there, but at least my avatar is not one!
I might have provided a bad mental image up there, but at least my avatar is not one!
Just be thankful your computer doesn't have the capability for 'scratch and sniff'. :D
Undecided
06-30-04, 03:19 PM
What there was a vote! Well, vote for me yada yada...should I not get enough votes to win the election. I will throw my votes behind a certain candidate, so that candidate can win. Jesus, its like I'm the NDP up there! Well… thanks to south star here’s my catchy propaganda ploy.
Bow down to tyranny! Undecided for mod!
http://www.mortandmindy.com/voices/stalin.jpg
Graduation photo!
[quote deleted]
i object to these depraved sexual references. i have kids for chrissakes. goofball, i demand you do your job or step aside!
i believe the fetus to be an able replacement
sargentlard
06-30-04, 05:19 PM
woo hoo..thats a 4th election I will lose.
lard! lose the avatar and slogan. replace with keanu reeves and something inspirational.
yours sincerely
karl rove
a while back i had the good fortune to recieve this from the patriot sargentlard. it was during 9/11.
i shall now share this with you
MY AMERICA
From the warm and welcoming waters of the Pacific Ocean,
Mysterious fathoms below.
To the rugged faces of the Rocky Mountians,
Snow capped through all seasons.
To the flat and gently rolling land of the Great Plains,
Golden wheat swaying in the wind.
To the hustling bustling streets of New York City,
Lights and signs from dawn 'till dusk.
This land of liberty,
Of freedom and life,
Sending us out into the world,
Souls soaring through the sky,
Fair and free,
And so are we.
ElectricFetus
06-30-04, 05:54 PM
sargentlard,
Yes seriously I think the man boobies are not helping you, ty a new avatar :)
Don't worry my viol language is something you will not see in politic or current events, As paul will not mess with me there.
http://members.rogers.com/music12/ed_files/america/flag.gif
Either You Are With The Sargent Or You Are With The Terrorists
sargentlard
06-30-04, 06:04 PM
Don't worry my viol language is not something you will not see in politic or current events
Errr..might wanna edit that.
sargentlard
06-30-04, 06:06 PM
[image]
Either You Are With The Sargent Or You Are With The Terrorists
See this is why I am losing.
do we really need a foreigner leading us?
wcf! are you at present, or at anytime in the past, been affiliated with the communists?
ElectricFetus
06-30-04, 06:32 PM
I don't know if I would be a foreign leader, this is the internet and exists in all places everywhere (where there is a computer hooked up of course)
Communism, no.
sargentlard,
Yes thanks that does make that statement a little weird sorry, bad hands arn't fully formed.
so wcf
am i hathor, spookz or sargentlard?
if i am sargent lard, can i also be hathor?
if i am not hathor, will i be spookz?
if spookz is sargentlard, what happens to me?
if i am both sargentlard and spookz, what does that make you?
if i am spookz, will sargentlard will left out?
hmm? of course there is another pressing problem that has rather serious consequences for life as we know it
hathor is 14 inches taller than spookz. The difference between hathor and sargentlard is two inches less than between sargentlard and spookz. hathor at 6'6" is the tallest. How tall are sargentlard and spookz? will that win sarge the election
solve and save the world
ElectricFetus
06-30-04, 10:35 PM
so wcf
am i hathor, spookz or sargentlard?
if i am sargent lard, can i also be hathor?
if i am not hathor, will i be spookz?
if spookz is sargentlard, what happens to me?
if i am both sargentlard and spookz, what does that make you?
if i am spookz, will sargentlard will left out?
hmm? of course there is another pressing problem that has rather serious consequences for life as we know it
hathor is 14 inches taller than spookz. The difference between hathor and sargentlard is two inches less than between sargentlard and spookz. hathor at 6'6" is the tallest. How tall are sargentlard and spookz? will that win sarge the election
solve and save the world
Who knows who you are, I don't care and no one here seems to care. It was you that first accused your self of being sargentlard, I have the quote, but no one now seems to want to bring any more evidence to either side of that issue so its practically closed.
I don’t have much of a problem with multiple user accounts, it just seemed a immature to use one to campaign for ones self.
Yes seriously I think the man boobies are not helping you, ty a new avatar
Nooooo!
But I like his manboobies avatar. :( It's one of the few things on here that is amusing nowdays.
I don’t have much of a problem with multiple user accounts, it just seemed a immature to use one to campaign for ones self.
Errmm WCF, the manboobied one is not Hathor. Hathor could never dream of having 'ta ta's' as sexy as the Lardy!
His manboobies rule!
am i hathor, spookz or sargentlard?
if i am sargent lard, can i also be hathor?
if i am not hathor, will i be spookz?
if spookz is sargentlard, what happens to me?
if i am both sargentlard and spookz, what does that make you?
if i am spookz, will sargentlard will left out?
I dare you to say that over and over again really fast. :D
hathor is 14 inches taller than spookz
With or without heels? :D
my thesis
the more ridiculous and imbecilic one appears, the more votes one garners.
yessirreebob. indeedlydoodly. the candidate is one of us
Is anyone actually taking this vote seriously?
Dreamwalker
07-01-04, 03:42 PM
Yes, but it is hard to find them under all this propaganda.
Undecided
07-01-04, 05:00 PM
Don't count out Sarge just yet...;)
outlandish
07-01-04, 05:02 PM
maybe hathy's wraith?????????????? (!)
Arditezza
07-02-04, 10:26 AM
You must ask yourself, do you vote for the man who can not make up his own mind nor seem to influence others much at all? Do you vote for the paranoid, who gets flustered when challenged? Do you vote for a man who accuses and does not support his accusations with facts, nor does he stand his ground on his convictions?
If you answered no to any or all of those, you must vote against WellCookedFetus.
Vote for Sargentlard. He's level headed, mentally stable and a man who stands behind his own ideas and values.
Vote for Sargentlard. He's level headed, mentally stable and a man who stands behind his own ideas and values.
And he has the manboobies.
You can't beat the manboobies. :D
VOTE FOR THE ONE WHO SHAKES HIS "TA TA'S"!!! :D
paulsamuel
07-02-04, 02:15 PM
You must ask yourself, do you vote for the man who can not make up his own mind nor seem to influence others much at all? Do you vote for the paranoid, who gets flustered when challenged? Do you vote for a man who accuses and does not support his accusations with facts, nor does he stand his ground on his convictions?
If you answered no to any or all of those, you must vote against WellCookedFetus.
couldn't have said it better myself.
ElectricFetus
07-02-04, 04:13 PM
Wow Arditezza you punch low, do you have proof for your claims there?
in order to preempt a repetition of your claim, the "vote for me" works if you consider the posts in question as a graphic. that was the original intent
ElectricFetus
07-02-04, 04:30 PM
It does not matter, I had evidence for my claims and so they were not uncalled for.
Yes I am a masochist, you have a problem with that? http://forums.guru3d.com/images/smilies/fouet.gif
It does not matter, I had evidence for my claims and so they were not uncalled for.
yes it does matter. you dare impugn my character in such a underhand manner?
how dare you sir! how dare you!
i demand you elaborate!
*smirk
ElectricFetus
07-02-04, 05:17 PM
sure, you said something that seemed like a confesion that you are sargentlard, period.
Arditezza
07-02-04, 05:23 PM
Wow Arditezza you punch low, do you have proof for your claims there?
Ah, I do sir... I certainly do.
There is the Xev thread, not the first but the second where you stated near the end that you had, in fact changed your mind and would have voted differently. It wasn't the first time, and I have noticed it one other time since. Exhibit A, you changed your mind.
As for influencing others, I find no evidence that you have. So there is your proof that you haven't. It does not help that your spelling and grammar are atrocious. A simple spell check in your email editor or just wordpad might do wonders. Exhibit B, you have never influenced me in any way, nor others it seems from the responses in this thread.
As for paranoia... You have stated that Hathor, spookz and Sargentlard are all the same person in this very thread, with no proof. Hathor is indeed spookz by his own admission, but Sargentlards posting style and opinions are far different from Hathors. You have no IP's or solid evidence that Hathor and Sargentlard are one in the same, yet you went on about it not only in this thread, but another. Exhibit C, your paranoia of people and you have accused without proof.
Welcome to the world of politics, where your past will haunt you.
Baal Zebul
07-02-04, 05:45 PM
Which one of you share my belief that some are more worthy than others?
Anyone ?
Just so i know whom to vote for.
Undecided
07-02-04, 06:48 PM
I do...I like the ideals of Plato.
ElectricFetus
07-02-04, 07:07 PM
Arditezza,
What is wrong with changing ones mind? Admitting one is wrong? Some of us are to immature to do that. I have that ability and will use it, moderators are human they can be wrong at times, admitting that is not a sign of weakness, it’s a strength, unless you would rather have a moderator bossing over you like a deity.
I do a lot of spell checking, in fact many others here can testify that I have mentioned that before, but when I run it though Word I do have problems of the program choosing the wrong word and I not noticing, I do a lot of editing for grammar and spelling afterwards as well.
I have only stated that Hathor is a psuedoname, not spook or Sargentlard, and not all three as the same person. That is a direct lie and propaganda on your part. Hathor claimed it him self, read the quote, which is evidence and thus my accusations were not unfounded.
Baal Zebul,
Could you elabeator :) It depends on what we are measuring in worth.
Arditezza
07-02-04, 07:40 PM
Hathor,
nothing, oh wait give me a second to get out my own psuedoname.
if this tie stay up maybe I could take one sub-forum and you take another, which one would you want? :)
ya there are 2 sub-forums here there should be 2 diffrent elected moderators.
sure I will apologies if they say its so.
Sure looks like you are accusing Hathor and Sargent of being the same person, and you even said that you'd apologize if the moderators proved you wrong. Hathor was just goading you at that point, for the humor factor. And trust me, I laughed.
I am often wrong, which is stated in my title... which means; "Often Wrong" But it's not just a matter of changing ones mind a few times, it's a lot of the time. You jump to conclusions on things, and then change your mind after the vote is cast. There are several examples but I am too damned lazy today to find them. I need a beer and a match.
Contessa Arditezza
P.S. You are trying too hard. At least Sargent doesn't have an agenda. He's realistic enough to realize he's just going to do a job that needs to get done. No fancy wording, no promises. When people want it so bad, I begin to question their motives.
ElectricFetus
07-02-04, 08:05 PM
Some how stating what I would do as moderator is "trying to hard"?
airavata
07-03-04, 02:32 AM
Sarge gets my vote. He's consistently demonstrated his common sense and calmness here. You don't have to be an expert at politics to be the mod of WE&P, you only need some sense.
WCF - Terribly biased. Would make a horrible mod. It's evident right here, when this genius accuses Sarge of having multiple accounts.
VOTE SARGE!
Baal Zebul
07-03-04, 03:13 AM
All humans are equal but some are more equal than others :p
In the past, if you were rich then you had 40 votes whilst a poor man had 0 votes and women had not the right to vote. (this was in sweden)
That was the good old times. But there was a problem, just because you were rich did not mean that you were important.
The National Socialists believed that the Aryan race was the master race of the world.
My Master Race has nothing to do with religion, culture nor skin color and origin. It is based on pure intelligence. (not IQ tests)
An inventor propels the society forward and are therefore "more equal" than others and should therefore have 40 votes. (Yes, of course the importance of the invention is a integer in that calculation)
Whilst a parasite, someone who cost more than he/she produce should have 0 votes.
They should niether have any money from the goverment since they do not give anything back.
Sounds harsh, i know. But survival of the fitest.
But i have already voted for Sarge
spuriousmonkey
07-03-04, 04:37 AM
Is anyone actually taking this vote seriously?
Don't know about the others, but I'm not taking it seriously yet. I'm holding back my vote for now, because it seems to be a typical democratic election. Lots of candidates and none you actually want to vote for. And lots of mudslinging in the election campaign.
Undecided
07-03-04, 09:49 PM
Lots of candidates and none you actually want to vote for.
Are we really that bad?
ElectricFetus
07-03-04, 10:12 PM
What bothers me is that Tiassa has not won yet, perhaps Craterchain was wrong :D . Spuriousmonkey vote for Tiassa s/he is already a moderator.
sargentlard
07-03-04, 11:30 PM
Lots of candidates and none you actually want to vote for.
Are we really that bad?
No..but it is easier to compalin isn't it. I don't get it....if we do not state our policies we are lazy and shady and if we do we are regular politicians that everyone abhors....
This isn't a life changing decision, its a election for a lookout on an internet forum. Any of us are competent... :rolleyes:
you more so than some, young man ;)
sargentlard
07-03-04, 11:42 PM
you more so than some, young man ;)
huh? I more than some what?
ElectricFetus
07-04-04, 07:50 AM
anu,
I hope you did not vote, read the rules. You could actually cause trouble for sargentlard.
airavata
07-04-04, 09:57 AM
Yes; you really are concerned about his welfare here on Sci aren't you WellCooked?
ElectricFetus
07-04-04, 04:35 PM
Yes I am airavata,
anu,
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=32273
If you voted before your 10th posts would be counted as a false vote.
Logically Unsound
07-04-04, 04:46 PM
vote tiassa!!!!!
paulsamuel
07-04-04, 05:14 PM
anu,
http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=32273
If you voted before your 10th posts would be counted as a false vote.
that's bullcrap! the vote is merely not counted, and it wouldn't get sargelard in any trouble.
don't listen to that blowhard, he can't even understand the rules of our forum while expecting us to allow him to moderate with those rules. he doesn't even have the attention span to read the link that he himself posts to support his hyperbole.
hmm
fetus, how do you respond to that heinous charge?
ElectricFetus
07-04-04, 05:42 PM
Excuse me but what does false vote mean, it means its not counted, if it not counted then that would mean that sargelard vote would have the be dropped one, which would cause much arguing for everyone the likes of which would be similar to the Gore vs Bush Florida recount although far less important or existing.
paulsamuel and I are arch nemeses, he will always counter anything I say and then we will go into a deep discussion on the meaning of the words used (most likely in this case “false” or “false vote”.) If you don’t believe me just watch and see, or better yet look up our post history. Most of all paulsamuel claimed he would ignore me, but as we can see he can’t help him self.
paulsamuel
07-04-04, 06:04 PM
Excuse me but what does false vote mean, it means its not counted, if it not counted then that would mean that sargelard vote would have the be dropped one, which would cause much arguing for everyone the likes of which would be similar to the Gore vs Bush Florida recount although far less important or existing.
what a slime ball, he doesn't have the backbone to even support his own statments. wiggle wiggle wiggle, like a little worm. like Clinton when he said "depends on what 'is' is" (paraphrased). you specifically said "counted". I'm telling you it would not be counted at all.
paulsamuel and I are arch nemeses,
we're not becuase I don't care 2 farts for you. i guess I consider you an 'arch-hole.'
fetus
so you accuse sargentlard of being a fusspot? interesting. i believe a logical corollary of that accusation is the implication that the sarge is disrespectful of the rules of this forum.
hmm
sarge, how do you respond to this heinous charge?
fetus
Most of all paulsamuel claimed he would ignore me, but as we can see he can’t help him self.
interesting. are you arguing that the good professor lacks self control? that he possesses an obsessive and addictive personality? i believe a logical corollary of that accusation is the implication that the professor (good) is a crackhead.
hmm
prof, how do you respond to this heinous charges?
everneo
07-04-04, 06:47 PM
Anu,
you are familiar.
heh
what can i say. hathor (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=625732#post625732) did not last very long ;)
hey goofball, could you administer the last rites (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=38046) for hathor?
ElectricFetus
07-05-04, 01:12 AM
fetus
so you accuse sargentlard of being a fusspot?
When? were did I say such a thing? I get the weird idea that you anu are grossly exaggerated the claims of others here.
heh
what can i say. hathor (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=625732#post625732) did not last very long ;)
hey goofball, could you administer the last rites (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=38046) for hathor?
Hatty boy get banned again? :(
ElectricFetus
07-05-04, 04:55 AM
I PM porfiry about having duel moderators be choosen, one for each one of the two subforums in question. Lets see what he says about it.
paulsamuel
07-05-04, 07:16 AM
I PM porfiry about having duel moderators be choosen, one for each one of the two subforums in question. Lets see what he says about it.
wow, talk about power hungry, you'd do anything to be a moderator, including hedging your bets on this election.
why don't you make a large monetary contribution, that always helps.
ElectricFetus
07-05-04, 07:38 AM
I was trying to be fair, I don't think the election should have covered two subforums, but you will see what ever you want.
It's all a matter of history. The two forums used to be one.
everneo
07-05-04, 09:04 AM
I was trying to be fair, I don't think the election should have covered two subforums, but you will see what ever you want.
People voted for you would not have liked the idea of a psuedo boob-attack in World Events sub-forum. If you take Politics and sarge takes WE sub-forum then you dumped the boobs on some of your voters. The same goes for sarge & those who voted for sarge hoping that no cooked fetus cooking up their posts. Dumping the voters is for politicians not for the would-be mods. Do you would-be mods agree ?
fetus
When? were did I say such a thing?
read this again
if it not counted then that would mean that sargelard vote would have the be dropped one, which would cause much arguing for everyone the likes
now develop and expand. i will assist you if needed ;)
airavata
07-05-04, 01:31 PM
Something's very familiar about anu.
so you accuse me of being run of the mill? a peasant? predictable? a cookie cut, human?
how dare you sir! how dare you!
Yes I am airavata,
so! the truth finally emerges.
the fetus and airvata are one!
thank you for this confession. i hereby submit this as grounds for disqualification
*smirk
Truly, truly amazing. Here I thought my bit in the nominations about illiteracy and colloquialisms was useless ....
Are we just jealous of American politics? Is that it? Because this is getting even emptier than the election coming up in November in the US. It's not that "fixing" the situation requires voting for me; rather, I point to the amount of complaining some posters do about moderation--and WE/P has never been kind territory in that respect.
Does one plus one equal two, or three? In this case, it might mean an infinite number of monkeys with typewriters. The performance art value I've witnessed this far along is truly precious.
Humans! Physick thyselves!
heh
Truly, truly amazing.
affliction...staid, conservative, blah. you know the drill
"Here I thought my bit in the nominations about illiteracy and colloquialisms was useless ...."
you see a connection? do elaborate.
Are we just jealous of American politics? Is that it?
jealousy (?).....
Because this is getting even emptier than the election coming up in November in the US.
...which results in "empty elections"? how so? empty as in.... devoid of any meaningful and legitimate platforms? or perhaps it is the sideshow or the circus atmosphere that is empty? personally, i would see it as a cause for pride. after all, we at sciforums, have always been cutting edge. heh
It's not that "fixing" the situation requires voting for me; rather, I point to the amount of complaining some posters do about moderation--and WE/P has never been kind territory in that respect.
you exaggerate. regardless of the relatively few incidents that occasionally crop up, i would rate the moderation on this site top notch and i wouldnt be suprised if most feel that way too. it is actually the lack of moderation that makes this forum standout
Does one plus one equal two, or three? In this case, it might mean an infinite number of monkeys with typewriters.
cool! try this..
monkey see monkey do.
None of the sentences in this pair is true.
The performance art value I've witnessed this far along is truly precious.
going to the circus and expecting broadway is always a letdown. i suggest a sense of proportion (?) be taken into acct when making judgements. it would most assuredly guard against injured sensibilities and disappointment.
Humans! Physick thyselves!
NO! ;)
*so! you did not like the "plunger" post?
did you miss this edit (http://server6.uploadit.org/files/crappypics-cumupass.jpg) from here (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=624121#post624121)? that, is the coolest (i think)
The undecided is a member or its really undecided? ...
bye!
antifreeze
07-05-04, 05:56 PM
the fetus and airvata are one!
thank you for this confession. i hereby submit this as grounds for disqualification
are you high? fetus was responding to a question from arivata. :rolleyes:
why stop there? touch on the "disqualification" bit and win a prize!
ElectricFetus
07-05-04, 06:53 PM
actually antifreeze I don't have a clue what anu is talking about.
I voted for lard this time. I'll vote for fetus next time.
Anu
Um ... wow.
As for responding ... well, I'll give it a shot.
heh
Truly, truly amazing.
affliction...staid, conservative, blah. you know the drill
"Here I thought my bit in the nominations about illiteracy and colloquialisms was useless ...."
you see a connection? do elaborate.
Are we just jealous of American politics? Is that it?
jealousy (?).....
Because this is getting even emptier than the election coming up in November in the US.
...which results in "empty elections"? how so? empty as in.... devoid of any meaningful and legitimate platforms? or perhaps it is the sideshow or the circus atmosphere that is empty? personally, i would see it as a cause for pride. after all, we at sciforums, have always been cutting edge. heh
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=628074))
I made an offhand retort about the (hooked on phonics) spelling of a colloquialism and got myself into a pointless exchange focusing on my disgust toward people who can't even spell the communicatively-challenged words they choose. It was a fuking waste of time.
But the uselessness of that discussion doesn't hold a candle to the present debate. That's all the connection is.
As to jealousy of American politics ... well, people seem to be aspiring to new substantial low, as if they're seeking to keep up with or maybe even one-up the Joneses of American politics. Atwater would be proud of the day the discourse was too lowbrow to actually require his brand of slander.
going to the circus and expecting broadway is always a letdown. i suggest a sense of proportion (?) be taken into acct when making judgements. it would most assuredly guard against injured sensibilities and disappointment.
I'm just curious--what are you talking about?
As to plungers ... doesn't that sort of reinforce my point?
Squinchy, Anu. Squinchy.
This topic needs a Hoover Dam-sized enema.
Frankly, Seaman Staines, I'm amused.
:m: :cool:
I made an offhand retort about the ( hooked on phonics ) spelling of a colloquialism and got myself into a pointless exchange focusing on my disgust toward people who can't even spell the communicatively-challenged words they choose. It was a fuking waste of time.
i actually have entirely different take on that incident. yet, it is really time to move on. i do not see any need to keep flogging a dead horse nor engage in revisionism.
i would suggest however that you keep in mind one pertinent point i kept repeating in that incident, namely, i do not give a flying fuck about your emotional wellbeing. your expressions of disgust would be better aimed at those suckers that could actually be conned into feelings of shame and guilt in order to prove your sense of self worth
But the uselessness of that discussion doesn't hold a candle to the present debate. That's all the connection is.
interesting. what is the present debate?
As to jealousy of American politics ... well, people seem to be aspiring to new substantial low, as if they're seeking to keep up with or maybe even one-up the Joneses of American politics. Atwater would be proud of the day the discourse was too lowbrow to actually require his brand of slander.
ahh i get it. so what in particular impressed you as to its "lowbrowness"?
I'm just curious--what are you talking about?
you said this....
The performance art value I've witnessed this far along is truly precious.
i'll respond in a simpler manner... what did you expect and why?
As to plungers ... doesn't that sort of reinforce my point?
yes but i do not see myself denying the point in the first place. strange as it may seem, i am reveling in the putridity of it all
06-29-04, 05:46 PM
god i love a down and dirty campaign
hit em hard boys. do not step above the fray!
i insist that all get their hands dirty!
we wanna see what you losers are made of
if that aint a clear indication of intent, i do not know what is
Squinchy, Anu. Squinchy.
and you must be dipsy donkey dofo?
This topic needs a Hoover Dam-sized enema.
and you my dear sir, need a fat cock in the ass
Frankly, Seaman Staines, I'm amused.
great, Jack Meehoff, i aim to please.
*now lets go splash around in the kiddie pool.
i do not give a flying fuck about your emotional wellbeing
Nobody asked you to.
interesting. what is the present debate?
Beats me. A few people are rambling about something. They act as if they think it's somehow important.
ahh i get it. so what in particular impressed you as to its "lowbrowness"?
It's transcendentally vapid.
i'll respond in a simpler manner... what did you expect and why?
Well, I've come by experience to not expect this particular degree of amusing artistic value on a regular basis from my Sciforums neighbors.
Really ... it's almost priceless fun to watch people acting like this.
yes but i do not see myself denying the point in the first place. strange as it may seem, i am reveling in the putridity of it all
That's all well and fine--whatever gets you off. But given your argumentative tone you showed in your prior post--
going to the circus and expecting broadway is always a letdown. i suggest a sense of proportion (?) be taken into acct when making judgements. it would most assuredly guard against injured sensibilities and disappointment.
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=628074))
--I figured to at least respond. Whence comes "disappointment"?
You may be the only person here that took my post remotely seriously.
Don't get me wrong; I don't lack appreciation for your apparent sense of humor. It's just that couched between the utter emptyheadedness of the first portion of your post I was responding to--
heh
Truly, truly amazing.
affliction...staid, conservative, blah. you know the drill
"Here I thought my bit in the nominations about illiteracy and colloquialisms was useless ...."
you see a connection? do elaborate.
Are we just jealous of American politics? Is that it?
jealousy (?).....
Because this is getting even emptier than the election coming up in November in the US.
...which results in "empty elections"? how so? empty as in.... devoid of any meaningful and legitimate platforms? or perhaps it is the sideshow or the circus atmosphere that is empty? personally, i would see it as a cause for pride. after all, we at sciforums, have always been cutting edge. heh
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=628074))
--it just seemed you were putting an awful lot of effort into missing the point in order to ... er ... seek out something to complain about.
Says a few things about your priorities, Anu.
Like that end section:
if that aint a clear indication of intent, i do not know what is
Squinchy, Anu. Squinchy.
and you must be dipsy donkey dofo?
This topic needs a Hoover Dam-sized enema.
and you my dear sir, need a fat cock in the ass
Frankly, Seaman Staines, I'm amused.
great, Jack Meehoff, i aim to please.
*now lets go splash around in the kiddie pool.
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=628381))
(Note: I have taken the liberty of adjusting the italic type from the original in a manner which I believe more directly reflects the author's intent.)
Now ... to me, that whole section is from left field:
• if that aint a clear indication of intent, i do not know what is - Do I care? What's ironic to me is that the "dirty campaign" isn't even focusing on substantial dirt. In that sense, it is pioneering, and perhaps prophetic of the upcoming American election. Cutting edge, indeed. But that's not always a good thing--just ask Allawi.
• and you must be dipsy donkey dofo? - Um ... I'm rubber and you're glue .... :rolleyes:
• and you my dear sir, need a fat cock in the ass - Be that as it may, I still don't see what it has to do with the topic at hand.
• great, Jack Meehoff, i aim to please. - When did this become about you?
• now lets go splash around in the kiddie pool. - How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
It is amusing. For some reason I can't shake from my mind the image of meeting the third McDonald twin. Now that connection, I'd like to understand.
But perhaps you might answer me a seemingly simple question: Why bare your teeth and pick an issue with me just to raise yourself as the issue?
It just seems ... extraneous.
Undecided
07-06-04, 04:22 PM
The undecided is a member or its really undecided? ...
bye!
You tell me...
my dear Witt Lyss
Why bare your teeth and pick an issue with me just to raise yourself as the issue?
pardon. i spent a few minutes pondering and decided on that particular approach considering.....
Truly, truly amazing. Here I thought my bit in the nominations about illiteracy and colloquialisms was useless ....
now this bit was directly below my post. it brought up a point that concerned a previous engagement b/w us. it really was not that much of a reach to conclude the post was directed at me. secondly, it was also ambiguous enough to to allow a degree of leeway in interpretation. thus i formulated a response that employed logic and a certain amount of levity. thirdly, it was i that set the general tone of this thread (perhaps by sheer weight of posts alone). i think therefore i bear a certain responsibility towards the evolution of this topic. so.....critique the thread and naturally it reflects on me.
anyway, apparently it appears that i can get as cryptic as you do. i shall endeavour to provide you with an explanation shortly
now this bit was directly below my post. it brought up a point that concerned a previous engagement b/w us. it really was not that much of a reach to conclude the post was directed at me. secondly, it was also ambiguous enough to to allow a degree of leeway in interpretation. thus i formulated a response that employed logic and a certain amount of levity. thirdly, it was i that set the general tone of this thread (perhaps by sheer weight of posts alone). i think therefore i bear a certain responsibility towards the evolution of this topic. so.....critique the thread and naturally it reflects on me.
Well, I suppose I should have presumed and then accounted for your paranoia, but I'll acknowledge the placement of the post in the chronology as well as the general vagary. But that's also the point: the general vagary. This entire topic is ineffably hilarious as its gone on.
But I generally make note in one way or another of who I'm directing a post at; I should know better than to expect people who put on the pretense of reading my posts at all to actually note any conventions of how I deal with individuals or groups.
Nonetheless, believe you're that important if you want. Only your paranoia could possibly inflate the "kapeesh" argument or my role in it to something useful.
What's rather funny about our current conversation is that you were actually a minor player--background static--to my prior critique.
Like I said: The performance art value ... is truly precious.
And I stand by that.
It's kind of like watching a troupe of blind mimes.
Well, I suppose I should have presumed and then accounted for your paranoia,
yes, the knee jerk response. i have come to expect no less
but I'll acknowledge the placement of the post in the chronology as well as the general vagary.
not bad. you climb a notch and esteem rises
But that's also the point: the general vagary.
down again
This entire topic is ineffably hilarious as its gone on.
niggy, you claim incomprehensibility with regards to the topic. as such, i am wary of according any credibility towards your pronouncements.
But I generally make note in one way or another of who I'm directing a post at; I should know better than to expect people who put on the pretense of reading my posts at all to actually note any conventions of how I deal with individuals or groups.
self importance indeed. rather than allowing room for error and misinterpretation, give me an outline of the conventions utilized. show me the art of the deal. i shall jot, scribble, print and save as, "tiassa's house of style and convention"
Nonetheless, believe you're that important if you want.
heh, thank you. i shall now be insufferable.
Only your paranoia could possibly inflate the "kapeesh" argument or my role in it to something useful.
uhh, still flogging that dead horse? nonetheless, what was useful about it? i found it...an irritant. as a precautionary measure, i now venture into sciforums armed with bug spray.
What's rather funny about our current conversation is that you were actually a minor player--background static--to my prior critique.
you are entitled to filter content anyway you see fit, nothing funny about that. its just that some have no choice in the matter due to the restraints and demands of ego.
Nobody asked you to.
you really need to get a clue. there is a plea for change and reform in most of your whining and rants on the human condition. you may not directly ask any one individual but a plea to the many is also a plea to the one. witness....
Humans! Physick thyselves!
tedious, young man, tedious!
Beats me. A few people are rambling about something. They act as if they think it's somehow important.
if you do not have clue, what level of validity should i accrue to this statement...
But the uselessness of that discussion doesn't hold a candle to the present debate.
eh? you think you are in any position to make comparisons? another thing, why begrudge the kids on this board an obviously novel experience? if modship means a feather in their caps, i see no reason for belittlement. for all we know, it might be a learning experience for some. one could possibly improve on social skills thru the duties performed by mods....ie: diffuse tensions, mediate disputes, etc. that alone would make the aspirations worthwhile
it's transcendentally vapid.
as it stands, all by its lonesome self, the above statement is meaningless and subjective crap
Well, I've come by experience to not expect this particular degree of amusing artistic value on a regular basis from my Sciforums neighbors.
it will get irritating after awhile. trust me, i know.
Really ... it's almost priceless fun to watch people acting like this.
i too had lots of fun until the fog made its dank and depressing entrance. forecasts predict sunny skies soon tho.
But given your argumentative tone you showed in your prior post--
nuts. i rarely misjudge a post, tiassa. besides, you come to me. you are in control of events. what is that saying......yes, you will reap what you sow.
--I figured to at least respond. Whence comes "disappointment"?
heh. you can never figure out the consequences of your ramblings, eh? here...
*Because this is getting even emptier than the election coming up in November in the US.
*Humans! Physick thyselves
*I point to the amount of complaining some posters do about moderation
*people seem to be aspiring to new substantial low,
a sense of disappointment is inherent in statements of that vein. ie: you have...a better way!
Undecided
07-07-04, 04:42 PM
I'd like to throw my support behind Sargentlard, and give him all my votes. He's my John Kerry!
interesting
votes eh?
why if aint for the fact that they go to the lard, i just might have to raise a stink about this
ja, i am partisan that way especially when it favors my man.
atta boy, undecided!
a sense of disappointment is inherent in statements of that vein. ie: you have...a better way!
Any substance to back that flash? Only a couple posts ago, you noted:
anyway, apparently it appears that i can get as cryptic as you do.
("Witt Lyss (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629259)")
I mean, on the one hand it's cryptic, and to the other it's superficial. Make up your mind. Right now it just looks as if you're complaining in order to maintain that low standard you're so proud of.
uhh, still flogging that dead horse? nonetheless, what was useful about it? i found it...an irritant. as a precautionary measure, i now venture into sciforums armed with bug spray.
Such as this.
Still flogging what? I mentioned it as a comparative, you threw a hissy-fit, and in the course of doing so you elevated that argument as if it concerned something substantial--
now this bit was directly below my post. it brought up a point that concerned a previous engagement b/w us. it really was not that much of a reach to conclude the post was directed at me. secondly, it was also ambiguous enough to to allow a degree of leeway in interpretation. thus i formulated a response that employed logic and a certain amount of levity. thirdly, it was i that set the general tone of this thread (perhaps by sheer weight of posts alone). i think therefore i bear a certain responsibility towards the evolution of this topic. so.....critique the thread and naturally it reflects on me.
("Witt Lyss (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629259)")
--whereupon I attempted to correct your self-centered, overindulgent notion:
Well, I suppose I should have presumed and then accounted for your paranoia, but I'll acknowledge the placement of the post in the chronology as well as the general vagary. But that's also the point: the general vagary. This entire topic is ineffably hilarious as its gone on.
But I generally make note in one way or another of who I'm directing a post at; I should know better than to expect people who put on the pretense of reading my posts at all to actually note any conventions of how I deal with individuals or groups.
Nonetheless, believe you're that important if you want. Only your paranoia could possibly inflate the "kapeesh" argument or my role in it to something useful.
What's rather funny about our current conversation is that you were actually a minor player--background static--to my prior critique.
(Tiassa (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629462))
And yet, in search of a bone to gnaw on, you cut the words into snippets (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629717) in order to post superficial, avoidant pseudo-responses:
Well, I suppose I should have presumed and then accounted for your paranoia,
yes, the knee jerk response. i have come to expect no less
but I'll acknowledge the placement of the post in the chronology as well as the general vagary.
not bad. you climb a notch and esteem rises
But that's also the point: the general vagary.
down again
This entire topic is ineffably hilarious as its gone on.
niggy, you claim incomprehensibility with regards to the topic. as such, i am wary of according any credibility towards your pronouncements.
But I generally make note in one way or another of who I'm directing a post at; I should know better than to expect people who put on the pretense of reading my posts at all to actually note any conventions of how I deal with individuals or groups.
self importance indeed. rather than allowing room for error and misinterpretation, give me an outline of the conventions utilized. show me the art of the deal. i shall jot, scribble, print and save as, "tiassa's house of style and convention"
Nonetheless, believe you're that important if you want.
heh, thank you. i shall now be insufferable.
Only your paranoia could possibly inflate the "kapeesh" argument or my role in it to something useful.
uhh, still flogging that dead horse? nonetheless, what was useful about it? i found it...an irritant. as a precautionary measure, i now venture into sciforums armed with bug spray.
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629717))
You certainly are living up to your intent to be insufferable. I mean, look at you--begging for another round like a penniless drunk.
Self-importance? How snotty of me to expect people who bitch about what I write to demonstrate the ability to read! Oh, the horror. Lament! Lament!
Just a quick reiteration on self-importance:
now this bit was directly below my post. it brought up a point that concerned a previous engagement b/w us. it really was not that much of a reach to conclude the post was directed at me. secondly, it was also ambiguous enough to to allow a degree of leeway in interpretation. thus i formulated a response that employed logic and a certain amount of levity. thirdly, it was i that set the general tone of this thread (perhaps by sheer weight of posts alone). i think therefore i bear a certain responsibility towards the evolution of this topic. so.....critique the thread and naturally it reflects on me.
anyway, apparently it appears that i can get as cryptic as you do. i shall endeavour to provide you with an explanation shortly
("Witt Lyss (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629259)")
Or even better--
Well, I suppose I should have presumed and then accounted for your paranoia,
yes, the knee jerk response. i have come to expect no less
but I'll acknowledge the placement of the post in the chronology as well as the general vagary.
not bad. you climb a notch and esteem rises
But that's also the point: the general vagary.
down again
This entire topic is ineffably hilarious as its gone on.
niggy, you claim incomprehensibility with regards to the topic. as such, i am wary of according any credibility towards your pronouncements.
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629717))
There's nothing quite like declaring judgments immediately after demonstrating your lack of qualification to do so. See, Anu, if you were able to demonstrate by the nature of your responses that you understood the words you were responding to, that would be an entirely different story. As it is, playing the illiterate in order to find any reason to throw a tantrum is pretty much all you're accomplishing. I'm sure there's some obscure performance value in your mind that justifies the behavior, but by the time you get down to bitching about people's sense of self-importance, well ... thank you for the chuckle. I don't feel so badly about taking amusement in other people's misfortune if they stubbornly choose to smack themselves in the head.
Hell, when John Cleese does it, it's considered good comedy.
ElectricFetus
07-07-04, 09:14 PM
Nope I have seen longer, If I were moderator I would ask for some efficency in writing style here, perhaps shorten the quotes to save space so we can read the post with better ease?
anu, are you actually going to address his retorts or are you just going to sit there, gawp and take the easy way out? And the term 'maggot', used in the belittling context, has little or no effect in todays world. Even the obvious attempt at belittling shows a huge weakness in your character. If you have no point to make then leave this thread for members who want to have a serious, mature debate about how a forum many of us love to frequent should be ran.
WellCookedFetus, such a change in a post demonstrated by Tiassa would be inefficient. If you were to edit his post to minimise the quotes used, regular viewers, such as myself, would have to constantly browse back and forth between various pages just to piece together his point. He was trying to make certain points and all quotes were indeed relevent.
ElectricFetus
07-07-04, 10:11 PM
I'm not saying I would edit it, I would "ask" for a more efficent writing style, so far s/he has not done anything wrong.
Ah yes so you did. I had my trigger finger ready. My apologys. But I can argue the point that in that instance the writing style was preferable for the everyday user. It may not be desirable if the quote came from the previous post but many experienced members here appreciate this and follow the tried and tested method of...
"Google today acclaimed the efforts... ...and then the pig ate the pie"
anu, are you actually going to address his retorts or are you just going to sit there, gawp and take the easy way out?
easy way out? and that is my modus operandi? can you show an instance where this has happened? were you not the one that accused me of going on rampages? back your assertion up, little boy. besides, what i makes you think i have to conform to your frikkin timetable? who the hell are you?
just shut up and watch the show. you may applaud when there is a lull.
kapeesh?
Fine anu. If you want a reply, here it is.
easy way out? and that is my modus operandi? can you show an instance where this has happened?
Well, it looks as if you have deleted your previous post containing you recent influx of verbal diarrhea. I applaud your maturity.
were you not the one that accused me of going on rampages?
I do not remember this and I should not be expected to.
back your assertion up, little boy
Once again, you choose belittling over rational thought.
besides, what i makes you think i have to conform to your frikkin timetable?
It just seems like common sense. If you say something then you should back it up. Not throw up a fit when someone confronts you about it.
who the hell are you?
And who the hell are you? Seriously.
just shut up and watch the show.
I'm attempting to save the show. This thread should contain a mature debate over issues that need to be met head on. Not full of excrement throwing contests that you seem so happy to continue.
Now, if you have anything remotely intelligent to say then please say it. If not, don't. Although I have already made my vote, others still need to and they need to know what each candidate stands for. As of right now I would guess no-one has a clue. So unless you have 50 odd members who want to wade through this thread, page after page, and then make a sensible vote then please continue this inane fallacy of an ego-contest you have just started up.
Well, it looks as if you have deleted your previous post containing you recent influx of verbal diarrhea. I applaud your maturity.
appearances can deceive, mr trigger happy. i did no such thing. in my two years here, i never have deleted any of my posts. in fact i allow it to remain as a testimony to my wisdom (heh) or in some cases, my stupidity.
so go take your applause to those more deserving, namely the moderators
I do not remember this and I should not be expected to.
you demand exemption? you think you are deserving of special treatment? pardon me if i refuse to comply. i suggest you bring along your wits to this discussion. it would help immensely. now looky here boy.....
06-28-04, 06:11 PM
Hathor, do you actually post anything here or do you go on rampages that attempt to put down others?
Once again, you choose belittling over rational thought.
wrong. it is a conjunction of both that is employed. the situation demands it and i hate to come up lacking. besides thor, what makes you think you can recognize a rational thought. have you not screwed up twice already in the space of a few posts with your bogus assumptions? did you not misread the fetus's intent that was so clearly spelt out? did you fantasize a few extra words into his post?
It just seems like common sense. If you say something then you should back it up. Not throw up a fit when someone confronts you about it.
that is not what i asked. this is tedious. i had ignored you for 2 frikking years and i can see why.
I'm attempting to save the show.
well! ok, i can respect that
This thread should contain a mature debate over issues that need to be met head on.
empty words, pal. well, go on then. have a mature discussion on the very important event of electing a frikkin janitor. cmon, elaborate on these pressing issues. i feel like a laugh
Now, if you have anything remotely intelligent to say then please say it.
ooga booga (what do you think?)
If not, don't. Although I have already made my vote, others still need to and they need to know what each candidate stands for. As of right now I would guess no-one has a clue.
heh heh. its just you my dear man, just you.
So unless you have 50 odd members who want to wade through this thread, page after page, and then make a sensible vote then please continue this inane fallacy of an ego-contest you have just started up.
its all tiassa's fault (pout)
wesmorris
07-08-04, 12:35 AM
I vote Sarge.
I think you're mistaken, You actually mean to vote again and this time for WellCookedFetus. Oh yes, you are. You don't know it, but it's the ultimate truth you come to realise through some serious meditation and alchocol consumption.
VOTE WellCookedFetus
anu, just who the hell are you. Seriously. You expect me to know that you were Hathor and then you go on about ignoring me for two years. Just who are/were you. This is pointless, I've "spoken" to people like you before and I know it is ultimately futile. But I will attempt to rectify some points you have just thrown up in the air.
appearances can deceive, mr trigger happy. i did no such thing.
As it is impossible to determine who deleted a post I shall give you the benefit of the doubt and apologise for my statement regarding that.
you demand exemption? you think you are deserving of special treatment? pardon me if i refuse to comply. i suggest you bring along your wits to this discussion. it would help immensely. now looky here boy.....
Demand exemption? From what? The fact you have multiple accounts (against forum rules I must add) and expect others to know exactly who you are. I would think exemption would be damned well called for in that case. And don't try to act superior by calling me boy. It doesn't work.
besides thor, what makes you think you can recognize a rational thought.
What makes you think I cannot?
empty words, pal. well, go on then. have a mature discussion on the very important event of electing a frikkin janitor. cmon, elaborate on these pressing issues. i feel like a laugh
If you feel it is not important then why are you even bothering to post in this thread. Just because you do not consider it to be important does not mean others feel the same. I could go on all day about the issues that need to be taken on but as I am busy I shall not. I hope you can appreciate that some of us have lives or does that not conform with you?
Unless I feel the need to I will not post in this thread again as we have already made it decend into this drivvle we see before us.
On an unrelated point. When does this poll close. Is the date in US date format or Internationak date format because it's impossible to tell from just looking at it.
it's arabic -> meaning: from right to left :D
in commonly accepted format it is -> the 4th of September 2007
spuriousmonkey
07-08-04, 09:51 AM
but how do you know they didn't use the other format here?
Dreamwalker
07-08-04, 09:58 AM
Well, I hope it ends in seven hours and not in 3 years :D
And Avatar, shouldn´t it be August?
august is the 8th month
This poll will close on 07-09-04 at 12:07 AM
Dreamwalker
07-08-04, 10:07 AM
Lol, you live in a different time zone, for me it would be August, this poll ends on 07-08-04 at 11:07 PM....
lol ic
our planet is really big
timezones strech in months not in hours! :eek:
Dreamwalker
07-08-04, 10:14 AM
Better not travel too far, the jetlag might kill you :D
But this poll gets interesting, WFC and Sarge are really close...
tiassa
Any substance to back that flash? Only a couple posts ago, you noted:
absolutely. when expectations of the kind you evince are not fulfilled, one usually feels a certain degree of dissapointment. it is a general condition of being human. you do know what it is to be one, yes?
I mean, on the one hand it's cryptic, and to the other it's superficial.
Make up your mind. Right now it just looks as if you're complaining in order to maintain that low standard you're so proud of.
so the tenor of your post changed. what of it? you think consistency is one of your strong suites?
there is a progression that one must follow in order to keep track of a thread. you missed it. note the section to which i omitted a response....like that end section (tiassa). it was to that i referred as cryptic. see here.....
*Squinchy, Anu. Squinchy.
*This topic needs a Hoover Dam-sized enema.
*Frankly, Seaman Staines, I'm amused.
thats yours
and you must be dipsy donkey dofo?
and you my dear sir, need a fat cock in the ass
great, Jack Meehoff, i aim to please.
and this was mine
apparently this was cryptic enough for you to refer to it as... Now ... to me, that whole section is from left field. did you really have a point to all that? if so, what? do you really think presenting it in such a manner would lead to a serious consideration of it? naturally i thought not and replied with an equally moronic response. it is you that brings this crap to the table. why whine if i bite? (google squinchy and find dofo)
Still flogging what? I mentioned it as a comparative, you threw a hissy-fit, and in the course of doing so you elevated that argument as if it concerned something substantial--
"kapeesh" naturally. it must rank. see this elevation occurs only in your mind. i mean, i question its usefulness, i find it an irritant. how the hell does that translate to "something substantial"
dear me. let me show you the error of your ways. let me revisit that point in time when all went to pot
06-25-04, 04:32 PM
Why should colloquial language also have colloquial rules? Generally speaking, people should at least know how to spell the simple words without referring to an "urban dictionary" designed to cater to those trying to understand what illiterates are saying ("coppish") and writing ("kapeesh").
now there is the original hissy fit (http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=37703&page=2&pp=20). there is the disrespect. do you really think that i am going to fucking let you get away with calling me an illiterate after it had been established that the variation is an accepted one simply because it offends you? you really fucking need to get a fucking clue.
lets move on to the latest hissy fit. your grand entrance....
07-05-04, 02:26 PM
Truly, truly amazing. Here I thought my bit in the nominations about illiteracy and colloquialisms was useless ....
Are we just jealous of American politics? Is that it? Because this is getting even emptier than the election coming up in November in the US. It's not that "fixing" the situation requires voting for me; rather, I point to the amount of complaining some posters do about moderation--and WE/P has never been kind territory in that respect.
Does one plus one equal two, or three? In this case, it might mean an infinite number of monkeys with typewriters. The performance art value I've witnessed this far along is truly precious.
Humans! Physick thyselves!
understand this. regardless of spin that either of us places on my role here, i am still a participant in this thread. diss the thread and you diss me in turn. i will naturally respond. think of it like this. think back towards the incident where you were up in arms over philforums ragging on us. it was not personal but you sure treated it that way, did you not?
this is tedious. it is like explaining to a frikkin child on how to conduct oneself in a non confrontational manner. anyway, lets move on...
--whereupon I attempted to correct your self-centered, overindulgent notion:
nice. cranking up the heat i see. i guess it is just a matter of time before megalomania enters the picture. you go boy!
And yet, in search of a bone to gnaw on, you cut the words into snippets in order to post superficial, avoidant pseudo-responses:
you mean sentences, ja? interesting. what issues am i avoiding here? is it the fact that i disagree with all your moronic assertions and expectations that compel you to pretend incomprehension? is it the fact that i do not acknowledge your neurotic desire to elevate and rise about it all that leads to "avoidant pseudo responses?" or is it the fact that i treat politics in a manner that befits it that gets your frikkin panties in a bunch?
god forbid! could it be all of them? say it is not so! please!
You certainly are living up to your intent to be insufferable. I mean, look at you--begging for another round like a penniless drunk..
and look at you responding like a mindless drone.
Self-importance? How snotty of me to expect people who bitch about what I write to demonstrate the ability to read! Oh, the horror. Lament! Lament!
get a grip, drama queen. lament indeed. is this not a constant whiny refrain of yours? one must note your conventions. one must follow your convoluted meanderings. one must be on the ball with regards to all obscure references. find your self a literary forum and take a measure of yourself there. you could possibly find yourself lacking. no more do you have the masses as a reference by which you measure your sense of self worth. yeah thats right. learn how to read, peasants. keep up with me, you 16 year old n00b. how easy it is to feel superior when one measures oneself against retards.
There's nothing quite like declaring judgments immediately after demonstrating your lack of qualification to do so. See, Anu, if you were able to demonstrate by the nature of your responses that you understood the words you were responding to , that would be an entirely different story.
i presume you speak from experience, eh? let me reiterate, if you cannot make your intent clear, if you insist on camouflage, obsure references and veiled insults, i will interprete your shit anyway i see fit. i am not one to ask for clarification when you do not even attempt to make an effort. see, i understand why you adopt this approach. it is in essence an attempt to cloak what is actually an ad hom attack. i understand very well what you are on about in this thread
now, exactly what is it that i have misunderstood. is the fact that i say you rag on this thread and its contributers? i mean, after all, you insist the grand entrance was not directed at me. do you even understand the extent of the contribution in here that i take credit for? simple political slogans and lighthearted jabs at a candidate. that is hardly a cause for pride.
you note in an earlier post....
What's ironic to me is that the "dirty campaign" isn't even focusing on substantial dirt.
and you know of some? dirt that is? ok. i am not really that cruel. i could have paraded the fetus's posting history here, selectively extracting that which makes him look incompetent. yet i chose not do so. it was far easier to....
Hathor 06-29-04, 07:39 PM
hmmm
my cattle prod is out of juice
lemme get some eggs
that is, prod and egg the fetus on to crucify himself.
he did so. admirably! of course no one gave a shit since the votes keep coming
As it is, playing the illiterate in order to find any reason to throw a tantrum is pretty much all you're accomplishing. I'm sure there's some obscure performance value in your mind that justifies the behavior, but by the time you get down to bitching about people's sense of self-importance, well ... thank you for the chuckle. I don't feel so badly about taking amusement in other people's misfortune if they stubbornly choose to smack themselves in the head.
uh, now i am suffering? what is my misfortune? and yes, tiassa, you are bloat. a self important lout. just ask around. most have your number.
Hell, when John Cleese does it, it's considered good comedy.
throw of those shackles and let it rip. i will be waiting
ElectricFetus
07-08-04, 04:17 PM
You Sargentlard supports make me ill! With only 1 hour left and your candidate trailing by 3 votes you do nothing. Come on people start demanding, start rocking the vote, plead for votes like NPR pleads for money on weekly bases! I know this is not very important to you, a voting for a moderator in a little internet forum, but pretend it is, have some fun with it.
bah
be gracious, i see no need to gloat.
Logically Unsound
07-08-04, 04:58 PM
i think if you get the modship you should give it to tiassa :p
Dreamwalker
07-08-04, 05:02 PM
Mmmh, five more minutes, looks like WCF wins.
ElectricFetus
07-08-04, 05:06 PM
anu,
I'm gloating?!?! :mad: I was trying to help! If I win, will be hated by you people and never stop hearing about it?
Logically Unsound
07-08-04, 05:06 PM
i cant wait, the tension is j-u-s-t u-n-b-e-a-r-a-b-l-e.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
t-i-a-s-s-a-t-i-a-s-s-a g-o-g-o-g-o-g-o-!-!-!-!-!
ElectricFetus
07-08-04, 05:07 PM
See that’s what I call support! Rally to the last minute, good for you, seriously!
Logically Unsound
07-08-04, 05:08 PM
fine, i shall do it more:
T-I-A-S-S-A-!-!-!-!-!-!
Logically Unsound
07-08-04, 05:11 PM
man, you can cut the tension with a knife... is that poll closed yet?
Dreamwalker
07-08-04, 05:13 PM
Obviously it is. Congratulations WCF, looks like you are now a moderator.
http://www.cheesebuerger.de/smilies/lustig/52.gif
Logically Unsound
07-08-04, 05:14 PM
the polll is closed;
WCF, have a medal, ur a mod
*fireworks*
comsiaerations to our losers, you get unlimited posting rights within sciforums ;)
and a tedy bear, thats really big.
Logically Unsound
07-08-04, 05:16 PM
heyhey nice smiliey, didnt see it before *buys glasses*
Dreamwalker
07-08-04, 05:17 PM
Mmh, I edited a bit after you posted...
Logically Unsound
07-08-04, 05:19 PM
dam you, cheater....
hes a happy blokéé though aint he...
http://www.cheesebuerger.de/smilies/lustig/52.gif
hehehehe
anu,
I'm gloating?!?! :mad: I was trying to help! If I win, will be hated by you people and never stop hearing about it?
not at all. congrats anyway and be good
Logically Unsound
07-08-04, 05:26 PM
who exactly is you people?
for the last zillion pages its only really been anu and other candidates posting.
ElectricFetus
07-08-04, 05:35 PM
Well I'm no a moderator yet, Goofyfish and Porfiry have to approve and make the change to my account.
Arditezza
07-08-04, 06:00 PM
Didn't Undecided give all his votes to Sargentlard? ;)
ElectricFetus
07-08-04, 06:19 PM
That does not count, that issue has been raise before and Porfiry Him self did not accept it.
sargentlard
07-08-04, 06:43 PM
W00t....go WCF...just don't forget the little people you fucker in your mod glory. :)
ElectricFetus
07-08-04, 06:49 PM
sargentlard,
No problem run for astronomy I’ll back you up so good even Jeb Bush's promise to Jr, Bush for victory will not match mine!
absolutely
Well, let us know, Anu, when you decide to show it.
when expectations of the kind you evince are not fulfilled, one usually feels a certain degree of dissapointment. it is a general condition of being human. you do know what it is to be one, yes?
I'm long past the point of being disappointed about the general tone that predominates Sciforums. Part of it is that I generally don't like thinking so little of this or that person, but after I got used to the fact that some people absolutely insist on making the point that they're just not smart and rather quite vicious, I feel much better about chuckling at their misfortunes. It's a free Universe; people are welcome to be as miserable and stupid as they want. And that point--that people are free to be miserable and stupid--is one that took some getting used to. It finally clicked when a poster with a sense of self-importance similar to yours in magnitude but who is considerably less vicious made the transition from the general to the particular in order to write away a consideration with the simple declaration, "I don't think I'm miserable." It still doesn't make any sense to me that someone should pretend they're happy in order to avoid considering the amount of human strife in the world, but it also occurred to me that there's no reason to get stressed about it.
In a way, it actually deepens an abstract faith of mine: Humanity has always been this stupid, and we haven't gone extinct yet.
If the Universe wasn't so damn vast, that might actually be something to be proud of.
The simple fact is that something is interfering with your reading comprehension. I mean, you quote the alternative yourself: Frankly, Seaman Staines, I'm amused.
apparently this was cryptic enough for you to refer to it as... Now ... to me, that whole section is from left field. did you really have a point to all that? if so, what? do you really think presenting it in such a manner would lead to a serious consideration of it? naturally i thought not and replied with an equally moronic response. it is you that brings this crap to the table. why whine if i bite? (google squinchy and find dofo)
This would be a lot easier if you didn't directly indicate by the nature of your posts that you do not understand the discussion you've landed yourself in.
I mean, really ... Now ... to me, that whole section is from left field:
•if that aint a clear indication of intent, i do not know what is - Do I care? What's ironic to me is that the "dirty campaign" isn't even focusing on substantial dirt. In that sense, it is pioneering, and perhaps prophetic of the upcoming American election. Cutting edge, indeed. But that's not always a good thing--just ask Allawi.
• and you must be dipsy donkey dofo? - Um ... I'm rubber and you're glue ....
• and you my dear sir, need a fat cock in the ass - Be that as it may, I still don't see what it has to do with the topic at hand.
• great, Jack Meehoff, i aim to please. - When did this become about you ?
• now lets go splash around in the kiddie pool. - How many surrealists does it take to screw in a lightbulb?
It is amusing. For some reason I can't shake from my mind the image of meeting the third McDonald twin. Now that connection, I'd like to understand.
But perhaps you might answer me a seemingly simple question: Why bare your teeth and pick an issue with me just to raise yourself as the issue?
It just seems ... extraneous.
(Tiassa)
You answered that last question by posting that self-important bit including chronology and general vagary:
now this bit was directly below my post. it brought up a point that concerned a previous engagement b/w us. it really was not that much of a reach to conclude the post was directed at me. secondly, it was also ambiguous enough to to allow a degree of leeway in interpretation. thus i formulated a response that employed logic and a certain amount of levity. thirdly, it was i that set the general tone of this thread (perhaps by sheer weight of posts alone). i think therefore i bear a certain responsibility towards the evolution of this topic. so.....critique the thread and naturally it reflects on me
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629259))
I have advised you twice about that passage (1 (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629462), 2 (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=630208)) and you still don't seem to get it insofar as you won't even acknowledge the point in order to dismiss or counter it. You just ignore it and go on babbling.
But we can focus more directly on one part of your claims:
did you really have a point to all that? if so, what? do you really think presenting it in such a manner would lead to a serious consideration of it? naturally i thought not and replied with an equally moronic response. it is you that brings this crap to the table. why whine if i bite?
(1) You still don't get it, do you?
(2) Why did you choose to take me seriously?
(3) Moronic, indeed.
(4) Try "biting" about something relevant, or else settle down, little doggy.
In the meantime, let's move on to your misrepresentations. Keep #4 above in mind:
"kapeesh" naturally. it must rank. see this elevation occurs only in your mind. i mean, i question its usefulness, i find it an irritant. how the hell does that translate to "something substantial"
How the hell does it translate to something substantial? Ask yourself, Anu. We've already been through this (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=630208), but you don't really care about what you haven't read or don't understand, do you?
I asked you, Why bare your teeth and pick an issue with me just to raise yourself as an issue?
You responded with a truckload of self-centered delusions that I've already addressed repeatedly:
now this bit was directly below my post. it brought up a point that concerned a previous engagement b/w us. it really was not that much of a reach to conclude the post was directed at me.
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629259))
As we see, Anu, you elevated the "kapeesh" argument in order to increase your sense of self-importance. So let's move on to some more of your misrepresentations now. They're all rather quite simple:
let me revisit that point in time when all went to pot
I applaud the attempt, but it is apparent from the outset that you are misrepresenting:
now there is the original hissy fit.
Interesting that you quoted from later in that discussion.
The original issue was that I wrote, The word is spelled "capiche."
The response, of course, was to post an urban dictionary (a reference designed to indicate what the actual words are supposed to be, not something that legitimizes colloquial speech as proper), an online etymology that reinforces my point, and an internet discussion which lends nothing to your position.
there is the disrespect. do you really think that i am going to fucking let you get away with calling me an illiterate after it had been established that the variation is an accepted one simply because it offends you?
So ... they wrote the Urban Dictionary based on your speech exclusively? It seems you're upset by the sentence, Generally speaking, people should at least know how to spell the simple words without referring to an "urban dictionary" designed to cater to those trying to understand what illiterates are saying ("coppish") and writing ("kapeesh"). By all means, correct me if I'm wrong.
So look at your angry question:
do you really think that i am going to fucking let you get away with calling me an illiterate after it had been established that the variation is an accepted one simply because it offends you?
It's very hard to take that question seriously, since in the exchange you're referring to, you seem to have overlooked a vital aspect:
What's so hard to grasp about the idea that it's unfortunate that we extol the dubious virtues of the illiterate by imitating them?
(Tiassa (http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=620424))
Or as I explained to Shmoo:
Really ... it just amazes me that people put so much effort into justify their forays into the lifestyles of the dim and misguided. I realize that consistent spelling is too much to ask of a culture in general, but something about using a colloquial dictionary to establish the legitimacy of a colloquial degradation of a colloquialism strikes me as just odd. Colloquial dictionaries exist to explain the twisting of conventional communication taking place within the vernacular. They don't legitimize colloquialisms as proper communication.
(Tiassa (http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=620526))
Or to Bells:
(I hope you realize I'm merely enjoying the sarcasm of it all. It's not necessarily the need to get votes from the right--that's a hopeless cause. But I live in a country filled with onomatopoeic comic books, and whose people survived an overdose of George Michael in a band of that name, and they still think the word is "wam!" Watching someone write poor colloquialisms is a bit like watching a gangster try to be tough and say, "Capiche?" while dressed in a pink tutu with "hair gel"--yeah, that's it ... it's hair gel--dripping from his ear.)
()
I know you responded to at least one of those posts, so I'm wondering what the problem is? I mean, if you'd raised the angry question before those posts, I certainly would have at least tried to clear it up for you, but you're still simmering about it for absolutely no reason.
In your rush to raise yourself to the center of the Universe, you also overlooked some things that I posted directly in response to you:
The simple fact is that people who are not compelled to communicate clearly are no longer capable of understanding even the colloquialisms they use.
If that isn't a beguiling testament to humanity, well, that's your loss. I find it rather fascinating that people demand some sort of intellectual credibility for using dysfunctional forms of what is generally noncommunicative language in the first place . . . .
. . . . So raising laziness and illiteracy to a literary and linguistic pedestal isn't frivolous?
([url=http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=620892]Tiassa (]Tiassa[/url))
And if it needed to be more clear:
I mean, you're relying on the illiterate and celebrating their dysfunction.
(Tiassa (http://sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=621130))
So if we return to the discussion at hand and revisit once again your angry question--
do you really think that i am going to fucking let you get away with calling me an illiterate after it had been established that the variation is an accepted one simply because it offends you?
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=630732))
--we see that both the inquiry itself and the anger are falsely founded.
And it's not like the reality of what you're overreacting to is subtly buried where nobody can see it. As I have shown, the issue was repeatedly addressed in that topic.
Just a question: Is it that you really think you can get away with such misrepresentation?
I mean, I'm a stoner--allegedly prone to memory issues--and I can remember what's going on in these and other topics. What's your excuse, Anu? Why raise all of this pointless crap of yours?
Oh, yes ... how silly of me to forget--
understand this. regardless of spin that either of us places on my role here, i am still a participant in this thread. diss the thread and you diss me in turn. i will naturally respond.
Something about self-importance goes here.
you mean sentences, ja? interesting. what issues am i avoiding here?
Perhaps the funniest thing you've written so far.
Do you know what a paragraph is? Do you understand that sentences within paragraphs interact in much the same way that words within a sentence do?
Words? Sentences? Paragraphs? Articles, chapters, sections, parts, books, volumes?
The sum effect of the words you're responding to is what you're avoiding. It's part of the reason you're continually and spectacularly missing the point.
For instance, when you wrote--
niggy, you claim incomprehensibility with regards to the topic. as such, i am wary of according any credibility towards your pronouncements.
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629717))
--a certain presumption of conflict is apparent. Your sound-bite responses are cheap flash and glitter. If you had paused to think in terms larger than sentences you might have noticed that I marked tactical errors, addressed issues of address, and restated what should have been obvious since the line about the monkeys:
Well, I suppose I should have presumed and then accounted for your paranoia, but I'll acknowledge the placement of the post in the chronology as well as the general vagary. But that's also the point: the general vagary. This entire topic is ineffably hilarious as its gone on.
(Tiassa (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629462))
Which leads us back, just for amusement's sake, to what is a candidate for the Horsepucky of the Year Award:
nuts. i rarely misjudge a post, tiassa. besides, you come to me. you are in control of events. what is that saying......yes, you will reap what you sow
(Anu (http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=629725))
So, yeah ... I take back my earlier assessment; this statement of yours is the funniest thing you've ever written. Really ... that was ... cute and fluffy. I hope you felt better for having made such a demonstrably preposterous declaration.
Of course, you're just being moronic for effect, right?
is it the fact that i disagree with all your moronic assertions and expectations that compel you to pretend incomprehension? is it the fact that i do not acknowledge your neurotic desire to elevate and rise about it all that leads to "avoidant pseudo responses?" or is it the fact that i treat politics in a manner that befits it that gets your frikkin panties in a bunch?
Actually, Anu, it's the facts that you think yourself so important that you bother with such stupid pride in the first place and also that you have no clue whatsoever what you're responding to that make it somewhat annoying.
I mean, look at all your misrepresentations that I've noted here. Look, people don't need to come to me with their SAT's in order to prove they can read; it is enough that they don't get hysterical about things they demonstrably don't understand.
To take a neutral example: The other day, a poster posted in World Events that WMD had been found in Iraq. The material removed, however, was long-known, non-weapons grade, and quite obviously never sold to Al Qaeda. Now, these politics aside, it's puzzling to many of us how the poster concluded that the removal of 1.8 metric tons of low-enriched uranium and nonessential radiological materials (e.g. cesium) that have been known about for years constitutes a discovery of the long-sought weapons of mass destruction. Someone eventually made the comment that the topic poster had been duped, but here's the confounding question: Was it politics that motivated the topic, or did the poster really believe that the removal of known materials constituted the discovery of WMD's where those known materials had not been counted as such before? The question becomes one of comprehension: What does the poster understand about the article? We only have what s/he writes to fill in that detail. And it's obvious that there's some misunderstanding. Is the poster unable or unwilling to understand? At some point, that misunderstanding, that absence of comprehension, affects the functional performance of communication; in this case the poster, as a result of specific comprehension, misrepresented the information contained in the article s/he posted.
Likewise with you, Anu. The selective attention you give my posts of late seems to seek conflict. You seem to be grasping at straws, avoiding points and screeching like a primadonna in order to make a scene.
get a grip, drama queen. lament indeed. is this not a constant whiny refrain of yours? one must note your conventions. one must follow your convoluted meanderings. one must be on the ball with regards to all obscure references. find your self a literary forum and take a measure of yourself there. you could possibly find yourself lacking. no more do you have the masses as a reference by which you measure your sense of self worth. yeah thats right. learn how to read, peasants. keep up with me, you 16 year old n00b. how easy it is to feel superior when one measures oneself against retards.
Your tantrums might carry more credibility, Anu, if you demonstrated the viability of their bases. At present, you're merely wailing about your own injured sensitivities; there's not much anyone can do to help you with that, though, if your sensitivities are such that you seek injury in order to complain.
i presume you speak from experience, eh? let me reiterate, if you cannot make your intent clear, if you insist on camouflage, obsure references and veiled insults, i will interprete your shit anyway i see fit. i am not one to ask for clarification when you do not even attempt to make an effort. see, i understand why you adopt this approach. it is in essence an attempt to cloak what is actually an ad hom attack. i understand very well what you are on about in this thread
Interpret away. One of these days you might actually hit the mark.
now, exactly what is it that i have misunderstood. is the fact that i say you rag on this thread and its contributers? i mean, after all, you insist the grand entrance was not directed at me. do you even understand the extent of the contribution in here that i take credit for? simple political slogans and lighthearted jabs at a candidate. that is hardly a cause for pride
The first part, as to what you have misunderstood, will take its own post. I'll give it a whirl later today. As to your contribution that is hardly a cause for pride--
it was i that set the general tone of this thread (perhaps by sheer weight of posts alone)
I agree that it's not cause for pride. Yet you raise it to such a point:
Do this sound familiar?
i think therefore i bear a certain responsibility towards the evolution of this topic. so.....critique the thread and naturally it reflects on me.
Or this?
diss the thread and you diss me in turn. i will naturally respond.
Just wondering.
uh, now i am suffering? what is my misfortune?
I consider such challenged literacy an unfortunate condition for someone who, as you are, seems compelled to attempt to communicate. At some point, however, I must defer to your right to remain in such a condition. It is your life, after all.
By the way, squinchy is a colloquialism "pertaining to, or reminding one of a fun feeling ... usually tactile in nature, but also can be used to denote coolness or acceptability." (PseudoDictionary (http://pseudodictionary.com/search.php?letter=s&browsestart=1960))
But that's also the thing about colloquialisms. Where I grew up, it was also an adjective for a certain character of feces, and was considered pseudo-onomatopoeic; this sense, however, derives from a literary employment of the word "squinch" as a verb--I can offer up for that use of the word a .PDF, see page 7 (http://www.gearupchicago.org/wwws/downloads/Language%20Arts%20Narrative.pdf). (The PDF quotes Stephen King, I believe from Danse Macabre.)
So you ought to feel honored; it seems I've compared you to a velvet jacket. My association with the word isn't widely-enough known yet.
Keep smiling, Anu. Between misinterpretation and misrepresentation, you're still setting that standard you're so proud of.
Undecided
07-08-04, 09:59 PM
You know I'm not surprised...
ElectricFetus
07-08-04, 10:06 PM
Undecided,
about what? tiassa unstopable yaking? the vote results? what?
CounslerCoffee
07-09-04, 12:11 AM
Congrats WCF. I hope you like my old job. You get free hand jobs, but the blow jobs cost money.
tiassa
a nibble
Today, 10:41 AM
nice. cranking up the heat i see. i guess it is just a matter of time before megalomania enters the picture. you go boy!
Today, 08:51 PM
.....poster with a sense of self-importance similar to yours in magnitude ...
..In your rush to raise yourself to the center of the Universe,..
...self-centered delusions ...
what do you think. do we have a winner?
Today, 08:51 PM
Likewise with you, Anu. The selective attention you give my posts of late seems to seek conflict.
what is the problem now? suffering from a persecution complex? it was just the two quotes below, pal. in both cases, you wag your finger in my direction. pardon me if that is a cause for annoyance.
your disingenuity is noted. do you not understand that you approach me? it is you that is addressing me. the historical record will clearly show the sequence of events.
your desire to critique and have it go unquestioned is unrealistic. i see no need to accept without question, the crap you spouted.
07-05-04, 02:26 PM
Truly, truly amazing. Here I thought my bit in the nominations about illiteracy and colloquialisms was useless ....
tiassa 06-25-04, 03:48 PM
The word is spelled "capiche."
your desire to critique and have it go unquestioned is unrealistic. i see no need to accept without question, the crap you spouted.
Question all you want. Why protest when I call my role in the "capiche" issue useless?
You're the one dragging it out, Anu. Get over yourself.
ElectricFetus
07-09-04, 01:24 AM
Great now its going to just get worse.
vBulletin® v3.8.1, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.