new electro-mechanical actuator technology tests

Discussion in 'General Science & Technology' started by wet1, Aug 11, 2001.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wet1 Wanderer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,616
    NASA's Second Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle Program advances propulsion technology with successful engine test series

    NASA's Second Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle Program - also known as the Space Launch Initiative - is making advances in propulsion technology with this third and final successful engine hot-fire designed to test electro-mechanical actuators.

    Information learned from this hot-fire test series about new electro-mechanical actuator technology - which controls the flow of propellants in rocket engines - could provide key advancements for the propulsion systems of future spacecraft.

    The test of twin Linear Aerospike XRS-2200 engines, originally built for the X-33 program, was performed Monday, Aug. 6, at NASA's Stennis Space Center, Miss. The engines were fired for the planned 90-seconds and reached a planned maximum power of 85 percent.

    The test was originally slated to attain full-power during 100-seconds of testing. Prior to the test, engineers determined the necessary results could be achieved at reduced duration and power. Based on this determination, both planned duration and planned power were reduced.

    Two shorter hot-fires of the aerospike engines were performed last month in preparation for the final test firing on Aug. 6.

    The Second Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle Program, led by NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Ala., is a technology development program designed to increase safety and reliability while reducing costs for space travel.

    "Because every engine proposed by industry for a second generation vehicle has electro-mechanical actuators, we took advantage of these aerospike engines already on the test stand to explore this relatively new technology now -- saving us valuable time later," said Garry Lyles, Propulsion Projects Office manager of the Second Generation Reusable Launch Vehicle Program at the Marshall Center. "This data is critical toward developing the confidence required to support the use of these actuators on future launch vehicles."

    Electro-mechanical actuators electronically regulate the amount of propellant (fuel and oxidizer) flow in the engine. The new technology is a potential alternative and improvement to the older pneumatic and hydraulic-fluid systems currently used by the aerospace industry to drive and control critical rocket engine valves.
     
  2. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  3. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    Electromechanical actuators have been used in civilian industries for 30 years. I am glad NASA is catching up to the civilian technology. (actually they finally feel confident to use it....). The next generation will be the digital valves they could use for super fine adjustments....
     
  4. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  5. wet1 Wanderer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,616
    To buck the trend does not stop the trend. It only delays it. In this case they are testing proven tech. and trumpeting it as new. The thing is by the time it is tested it will be obsolete being as the delay has so postponed the benefical use to the point that the next advance is already here. Could it be that they know the use of the digital valve and it's advantages but have failed to so properly test it's predecessor that it is now needful to have that data base to fill in the holes. It can not be that they plan to use these servos for any period of time. Not when the advantages of digital are only to be reached for.
     
  6. Google AdSense Guest Advertisement



    to hide all adverts.
  7. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    My experience is that anything in government is about 10 to 15 years behind. By the time they acknowledge the technology, test it , re-test it, prototype it, test it, and finally deploy it - 10 years is easily gone. One more cycle, another 5 years.

    Our nuclear industry is the same way. In 1985, they were using 1970s technology. I guess, they want to be really really sure. Besides, government is not in the business of making a profit. So the word "productive" may not be in their vocabulary. That is why all the non productive member of our society can be found at....
     
  8. wet1 Wanderer Registered Senior Member

    Messages:
    8,616
    Surely you would not go so far as to suspect (gasp) that those who lead us might be considered unproductive?
     
  9. kmguru Staff Member

    Messages:
    11,757
    I am sure you know the old saying " Those who can..Do, those who can't...teach or get a govt job"

    How many government officials you know that understands business needs let alone the complexities of economy? Republicans (the friends of business) will tell you, Democrats do not. So let us take 50% out. Now, since Republicans could not deliver us out of this economic rut, take them out too (another 50%). What is left are the true leaders....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page