Re: Proposal, EI_Sparks....

http://www.sciforums.com/showthread...4&page=13&pp=20

Totally unfounded claims, yet he says for a fact that I am indeed a child molester, that is before I said anything about him being a "pussy bitch" which was at least verifiable and creditable. EI_Sparks has engaged in slander of the lowest kind, by stating as a fact that I am a child molester. Prof, you do what you need to do.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I want to cite this as the first abuse of this so called "right". Vindictiveness is the sole reason for this thread. That is shameful.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Vindictiveness is the sole reason for this thread

Nor do I deny this, but how is it that one is allowed to pursue one for much lesser crime? Unlike my proclimation, this is founded on nothing more then ignorance, and slander.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Leave the poll stand. It will serve as an excellent test of the mechanism.

 

I hereby claim that Undecided is, in fact, a child molestor

that are sparks words ??? sparks .... you should be spanked !

 

Those are my words, and I strongly suspect they're being taken well out of context.
I'd recommend you read the relevant section of the thread they were written in.

 

the link isn´t working proper ...
BTW , you really think something like "I hereby claim that Undecided is, in fact, a child molestor" can be out of context ??? i don´t think so

Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!

 

I will explain the context in which they were written, I said that x number was the only one available, thus it must be considered. He rejected it, and thus using this logic he called me a child molester, all in the while knowing that it was wrong to do so. Also notice the words fact, and since he was using this logic, he meant it.

 

If so, then this thread is over.