Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. amzanig huh? Dave
Woah cool but what about words that are anagrams of other words? isnt this really just an excuse for bad spelling?
Well at least 2 ppl found it interesting, I never did see any other posts about it and neither did the other 2 repliers so it was still worth posting again methinks. Dave
technically yes but it is surprising since this has been heavily circulated in e-mail and forums..but even so you stand corrected and i apologize for the negative contribution.
