am missing Cottontop3000

yeah, i know he's only been banned---for fuks sake!--for only a few days, but i miss him.
he is one of he very few real people here.

can only wonder about the decision to ban him. all i can say is that those that did do not have the northern sense of humour we have up here. we all a spade a spade and wont put up with fools, but also have a wicked sense of humour.....all of which cotton got

why te livin cuntin prickin shittin bollokin arseholin fukin fuck filthy mouthed racist nazi scum should be given freedom, yet someone like Cottn--just cause he swears--gts the ban order, i cannot fathom. usually this forum is the most freeest i've been with

anyway i hope he gets back soon and is allowed to BE HIMSELF

AS OTHERS ARRRREEEEE!

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I'd think he was banned because he only wants to antagonize people like a troll.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

Normally bannings are noted in the post above, but it doesn't appear to have been updated for a while now.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

i HATE bannings, and hae lists of banned more.
used to be a member of infidels forums. it portray itself to be an openminded place where all forms of huma iquiry are welcomed. in reality its a little fascistic forum, where moderators love disrupting frre flow interchanges with little hitler red ink warnings.....at their own discretion of course---capricious. what suits them.

te ony reason i see for banning is when someone threatens to hack your personal details. this happened once at anoterforum. te poster got banned yet still managed to post...hehe

Cottontop is real. his colourful reponses tp people--usually increidbly ignorant people were striagtht to te pointand humourous. where i am from tis is part of te culture and tells itlike it is

it is good to have tis diversity. especially when out and out racists are alloowed to spread malicious propaganda.

Why is such propaganda accepted when a few swear words aint? espcially when the strong language is used passionately supporting NON prejudice?!

on Tv for example are usually swear words are een as more dangerous tan actual depictions of violence. such forum modification is a reflection of a more general atitude

 

Try threatening people, which he did.

 

look. he is human. when people come with such offensive views they provoke such a reaction in some people

WE ARE NOT ALL THE FUKIN SAME
tere are racists an people who swear at racists, so why pick on the fukin former??

 

mean...'on the fukin latter'

always get my formers andlatters mixed up.......shit its so pretentious

 

So? He's a better person that you, cozzy. He's a better person than me, he's better than many here.
Plus, he threatened people that deserved to be threatened, and went against the people that needed to be gone against.

 

Racists are people too. No need to flip out and get offended, just because they're different.

 

Precisely. If you stated that racists weren't human, then you wouldn't be any better than them. Sure, they have very warped views of the world and humanity, and thier pathology and actions are barbaric, but they are people, too.

 

Funny that all racisits can do is threaten others that don't like what they are. Instead of convincing others in a normal dialogue they can only return to the basics of threats and intimidation to others. Seems that's why they don't have to many that believe the way they do because they are in the very small minority by using threats instead of reason to bring about change.

 

That's a very unfair generalization.

 

So, what cowardly mod banned Ol' Cotton, anyway? Who? Where's the coward?

 

Bring him back. Unban him. He's cool.

 

might we know what he said to deserve a one week ban?

 

Does it matter?

 

what .....you mean 'be christian' about it? learn to 'love your enimies'?...christians are infamous for obeying that shit arn't they?

no. i like real. IF someone who is coming out wit racisti views that are actually violent in themselves, in that they hurt and propigate all forms of violence via teir propaganda, then that needs challenging, which is what Cottontop3000 is/was doing. to then point the finger at him as thoug HEis the sole violent one cause of colourful language is not right to me. either have a policy that bans racist views outright, OR allow people to vent their justifiable rage said people

i am not for physical violence against racists as that means you are stooping to their level. but here is words isn't it. not fisticuffs

 

Just as they generalize about those they are against.