most likely a hoax but you never know, could be real, i go 50/50 on the matter.
but i sure would have a heart attack if i saw these guys running around MY back yard

Resist ....
Making ....
Paris....
Hilton....
Joke.....

Resist ....
Making ....
Paris....
Hilton....
Joke.....


are you saying the paris hilton video doesnt exist?!?!?! WHY I OUGHTA~!!!!!

Whoever made these would have been better off selling them as art, I think they look awesome.

Not saying they definately aren't real, but you know, its extremely unlikely.

Why do aliens always look like that?

I mean they look like incredibly vulnerable. The wind could blow them over in a whif. An ant could kill them. They run around naked in what seems a pointless activity, probably an effort to find a rat and get killed by it.

Isn't the mere fact that they look like a stereotypical alien proof that the pictures are bogus???

You are kidding me? Hoax. I've seen more credible looking aliens than those before, and it was Steven Spelberg's "Taken" :D

Where did you find those pictures?

Why do aliens always look like that? I always figured that the gray skin and the black eyes had something to do with the home system's star. Short and agile says something about the gravity they're used to, and the thin bodies and long fingers suggests they may have evolved on a very young planet and developed in an environment where their hunter-gatherer phase was spent picking bugs out of the cracks in rocks.

By the way, if you're ever abducted by aliens, look at your hands. I'm told that if you have problems seeing your hands, you're dreaming. I can't cite that origin of that theory.

Why do all the 'aliens' appear to be about 6" high?

They look like us, but they seem to be very small and very skinny. why? Perhaps they have realized that physical strength and size does not matter very much, and perhaps they have reduced their physical strength in exchange for more intelligence (using advanced genetic engineering and advanced technology) This also related to their facial appearance. They seem to have Large, Blackened Eyes- to me this suggests enhanced perceptual vision- Their eye structure must mean they can see better, or perhaps see things we cannot (i.e: infrared, ultraviolet, electromagnetic...) and lastly we come to their mouthes. usually their mouth is descibed as a small slit or no mouth at all. many movies depict aliens with no mouth at all. This to me suggests they have done away with vocal communication and developed more advanced methods of communication, such as Telepathic Communication and/or Antennae Signal Communication.

- tiassa also has some very good ideas on this subject

these photos look a bit fake, and i dont see anything in the second one.
give em an E for Effort, looks alot like the corn field scenes in "signs" heh.
still i dont take these photos as proving that aliens are fake. they are very much real.

well,
i think the sterotype is more along the lines of little green men....

from what i heard about the area 51 crash the aleins where small with big heads and grey skin and large black eyes
so these pictures fit the discription

tho i am to belive that there are more than one kind of visitors, visiting our planet

its just a theroy but.... i think that the grey skined big headed skinny limbs aleins are the friendly ones and that there is another kind out there that are "evil". i once saw a video from apperntly the hubble satalite, where one light shots at another, it really raises some questions if the clip is real.

and yes i can under stand that these guys gave up streght for intelegents, why else are they able to come from a planet we know nothing about and hover around with crafts with amazing speed and monoverablity

i got these pics from a great website, a few of the things on it most likely are hoaxs, but they posted them anyways cuase you never really know whats real or not. ill try to find that web site again


tablariddim - i dont think they appear to be 6feet tall becuase of the way the camera captured the 3 pictures, they are all pointing down at a angle, proving that the one taking the picture must of been taller than the creatures themself, also i find it very interesting at how skinny there limbs are. plus the arms seem more extended from the elbow out than a human, even for someone of that size

i cannot find the website i got these photos from (i wish i bookedmarked it, it was a really good site) but here is another site i found interesting:
http://www.nuforc.org/

check out the "report database" really interesting storys

no pictures really on this site, but the database of UFO reports are quite large

you can search the database by date, location, and shape of the UFO in question

its really interesting, its worth checking out

LMAO. I've explained these photos 2 or 3 times on this site.

You can find that little doll at more toy stores. Have you noticed how it's taped to the fence and the tree?

LMAO. I've explained these photos 2 or 3 times on this site.

You can find that little doll at more toy stores. Have you noticed how it's taped to the fence and the tree?



enhance the photo and show me the "tape"
and please give me the link to the old threads

dont get me wrong, it is a reasonable explanation, but give me more proof than speculation.

Large version of the photos
http://www.thelosthaven.co.uk/Greys.htm

Most importantly, the second photo... where it is easy to tell that the figures are attached to the fence.

mmmm after seeing the pictures inlarged and more cleared up....

the first 2 on that sight now do look fishy, the bottem 2 could go either way


the top one it kinda looks like the leave are bigger than the alien.... but im no image detective....

Yeah, there is no depth to the pictures at all. More importantly I do recall someone posting a link to the actual figures... but I can't seem to find it.

i used to have one of thoes flexable alien figures myself :)

but you gotta admit, the photos are neat :)

its "art" :)

Nah, I really don't think they are neat, or art, unless you mean bad art. It's very flat, looks like the aliens have been composited on a background. And visually it appears as if the supposed photographer has gone right up to their face, blatently pointed the camera in their face, and shot them. I think this is a very poor attempt at a hoax.

most likely a hoax but you never know, could be real, i go 50/50 on the matter.
but i sure would have a heart attack if i saw these guys running around MY back yard
Ever notice that most images of these so called aliens are always at night and taken with poor quality cameras? Seems odd that no image can be shown that could also be substantiated by an actual talk with these aliens. Why would they just appear then leave, if they were real they would have shown up on the Larry King show by now wouldn't you think? I mean these sightings have been around for almost 100 years, they must be rather bored not being able to come out to McDonalds. :D

if they were real they would have shown up on the Larry King show by now wouldn't you think?

It's comments like these that continue to amaze me. :bugeye:

I think his point is that they'll stand there and pose for the locals, but they never happen to do that in a heavily populated area.

I myself dont believe aliens have come to earth, I believe that there is life outside of our solar system, being that space is far too large a expanse and it seems somewhat self centered to think we are the only things to exist sentiently. But, On the off chance these are aliens, if they can travel to earth, what is to say that they are not wearing suits as we wear our suits to the moon? They could very well be polymer suits explaining the seemingly gigantic eyes and small mouths (Rational disporportion).

I think his point is that they'll stand there and pose for the locals, but they never happen to do that in a heavily populated area.

Really??

Well lets see the pictures then.

I think his point is that they'll stand there and pose for the locals, but they never happen to do that in a heavily populated area.

Sometimes they do.

Los Angeles(1942) - Our Military fired on a UFO hovering over the city for close to an hour.

Washington DC(1952) - Our Military sent pilots to chase away UFO's over the Nations Capital on two occassions.

Soviet Union(60's) - The Soviet Military Chased and fired on a UFO for over 5 hours.


Belgian Incident.
The reports of incidents occuring at Military installations with numerous military eyewitnesses.

Like I've said so many times, most people just aren't aware of the evidence.

Really??

Well lets see the pictures then.Um, they are at the top of this thread. My comment, and his, were based on people trying to claim that they have pictures of them just standing there.

The obvious question is, why do they stand there for you but not for others?

Sometimes they do.
Los Angeles(1942)...
I thought this thread was about photos of aliens, not UFOs?

Persol,

I'm probably more irritated by these photo's than anyone. I'd like for this Subject to be taken seriously for a change. When people post photo's like this, the challenge becomes even more difficult.

Photo's Prove nothing, and can't even be used as collaborating evidence. For all we know, this could be a cardboard cutout. Why someone would post them, and even suggest they may be real is beyond me.

Sometimes they do.
Los Angeles(1942)...
I thought this thread was about photos of aliens, not UFOs?

I was just giving you some examples of them possibly showing up over populated areas.

Photo's Prove nothing, and can't even be used as collaborating evidence.
I disagree. A good photo can be used. It just seems that aliens like people with cheap cameras.

A good photo huh? Highly unlikely. Technology today makes altering photographs as easy as walking to the bathroom. If I wanted I could make a photograph a very realistic picture of the white house exploading and give it to people as proof that the president is dead. Would they believe it? Well with the right story and enough photos then many would, but it doesn't make it true.

I think its about keeping the world from panicking, especially if they are hostile they dont want us to build anything defensive that could kill them, these images are very poor quility and unconvincing, except mayb the last 1 on that page of 4 earlier, the alien was behind a tree rather than sitting conveniently positioned on top of something, I think they are out there, but that sure as hell aint them.

A good photo huh? Highly unlikely. Technology today makes altering photographs as easy as walking to the bathroom. If I wanted I could make a photograph a very realistic picture of the white house exploading and give it to people as proof that the president is dead. Would they believe it? Well with the right story and enough photos then many would, but it doesn't make it true.

Exactly!

The best photo's are still those taken 40-50 years ago.

When I say best, what I'm talking about is credibility. The technology to fake the photos, wasn't available then. Unless you consider throwing a frisby/hubcap into the air as technology.

Exactly!

The best photo's are still those taken 40-50 years ago.

When I say best, what I'm talking about is credibility. The technology to fake the photos, wasn't available then. .


The ability to fake photographs is as old as photography.

I think its about keeping the world from panicking, especially if they are hostile they dont want us to build anything defensive that could kill them

A Good Point, very good indeed. But its not THEM that are hostile, its US.
unfortunately the corrupted US Gov't (air force) is planning to weaponize space, pretty recent news, and i remember a ufo-testimonial years back where someone warned that we will try to weaponize space soon and we cannot let it happen. for the reasons Lemming just said- it will show we are not friendly and will probably cause hostility in the cosmos around here...
i really hope they decide not to weaponize space.
the aliens arent hostile (most of them at least from what ive heard and read)
and are pretty much just curious i guess. if theres a big gun pointing at them when the knock at the door then u can imagine how they will feel.

and on the other hand, they have been known to disable some of our missile silos in the past- but thats besides the point.

wired link:
http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,62358,00.html

if you oppose the idea of putting weapons in space and are willing to support the opposition, send me a PM or e-mail and ill show u to our message boards

The ability to fake photographs is as old as photography.

NOBODY said it wasn't possible in the past. What was said was that with todays technology, it's easier to do, and more difficult to detect.

You said, "The technology to fake photos was not available then."
Then you said, "What was said was that with todays technology, it's easier to do, and more difficult to detect."

Not being available at all, and not being easy to do and difficult detect, are two completely different things.

I can only go by what you say, not by what you meant to say.

It is the same imprecise speech that I mentioned in other
threads elsewhere in this forum. You really should work on it.
The ability to clearly express your ideas and present your
arguments would go far in helping to support your position.

:m: Peace.

There have already been space weapons in the past, like the star wars missile system that was disabled, I'v heard that the USSR took up the idea though, also your link mostly refers to satellite defense, not attack.

It is the same imprecise speech that I mentioned in other
threads elsewhere in this forum. You really should work on it.
The ability to clearly express your ideas and present your
arguments would go far in helping to support your position.

:m: Peace.

Understood,

What I was referring too was the Computer technology used today with photography. They can make anything they'd like appear real in a photo. 40 years ago, this technology wasn't available. This is why I put more stock into photo's taken then, than I do now.

The fairy photos those little girls took a century ago fooled many people for many years. Even Sir Arthur Conan Doyle went to his grave believing they were real. That was just cut-outs from a book. Darkroom techniques from the 40s and 50s were quite amazing in the right hands. The only difference in what was capable today and what was capable then is that now it takes minutes to do, where then it took hours or days. People with the patience and talent and attention to detail and precision could do as good a job at faking a photo as many people could do with Photoshop these days. In some ways, it could even have been easier. Those photos were in black and white. Matching color and saturation and tint, which makes altering photos in Photoshop very difficult to make a photo look real, was not an issue. I wouldn't put any more stock in those photos being real than I would anything from today, for the same reason you don't put as much stock in today's photos because of the possibility of Photoshop work.

If you have a copy of Dr Michael Wolf's book, The Catchers of Heaven, on the front and back pages are photos of two aliens; the first a small 'grey' called Kolta and the second a humanoid type called Prince Sri-ha. Wolf was head of the Alphacom team which reported to MJ12. He obtained permission to write his book which makes me believe that there exists a desire to allow out a limited flow of ET information to the public.

If aliens are so averse to being spotted how come they didn't hide or confiscate the film when someone started snapping flashbulbs in their faces?

~Raithere

That was my point, just not phrased quite as clearly.

Maybe the concept of photography is completely alien to them, and they don't know what you're doing when you snap your Snappy. ;)

Or maybe not. Maybe some of them are just hams and like their picture taken. Wonder if they ask for prints to take home to the family. They can go back home to the "One Nanosecond Photo Lab" and make copies. Do they take pictures of the guys taking their pictures as souvenirs?

Now that I think about it, probably not. Since they don't wear clothes, apparently, they don't have pockets. No pockets, no wallet. No wallet, no way to carry photos around with you.

I would think The Great Leader would want his minions to document the Anal Probe Project, at least for posterity.

You would think that in the course of several thousand years of visits to earth one of those little grey bastards would have dropped his wallet.

If aliens are so averse to being spotted how come they didn't hide or confiscate the film when someone started snapping flashbulbs in their faces?

~Raithere

Who ever stated that they were adverse to being photographed??

Maybe they are simply indifferent to it.