This (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=42425) thread. Why the heck she closed it!? Like.... can she just close whichever thread she doesn't like!? Is that fair at all for other people?

I mean... there was no problem with that thread at all! And she simply closes it! Seems extremely biased to me. :bugeye:

This is not the first time I heard she did that. And when it comes to philosophy, it can be quite annoying to have her closing threads just because she doesn't like the subject. I propose we vote for a new moderator. :bugeye:

Oh, that is new, an impeach Xev thread...

Anyway, I think she has a good point. Alas, you could try putting that threadup in human science or Eastern philosophy, it might fit better there.

Even if that is true, that doesn't give her the right to close all the threads she doesn't like. She can always move, ya know......

Perhaps you could put that thread up in the pansy idiot faggot section.

Oh there isn't one? Well perhaps you could leave the site all together.

It's not philosophy. The traditional approach of Western philosophy has been to logically analyze problems, questions or states.

"For the sake of discussion, I shall define "spiritual" as everything that is not physical or directly related to logic."

This removes it from logic and indeed from the physical itself. Good lord, you're not even discussing a subject.

I love these threads.


And she simply closes it! Seems extremely biased to me

Damn, you got me. I think you're hot, Truthseeker. I grew up in a very deprived environment, so I associate abuse with love. Thus I mock you, thinking that I am displaying my affection. Although I taunt you for being weak, I *really* just want to ride your juicy meatstick.

I think you're hot, Truthseeker. I grew up in a very deprived environment, so I associate abuse with love. Thus I mock you, thinking that I am displaying my affection. Although I taunt you for being weak, I *really* just want to ride your juicy meatstick.

Wow, Xev. Ya should get an award for subtlety.

Xev:

Damn, you got me. I think you're hot, Truthseeker. I grew up in a very deprived environment, so I associate abuse with love. Thus I mock you, thinking that I am displaying my affection. Although I taunt you for being weak, I *really* just want to ride your juicy meatstick.
Seems to be the mantra around here.

Dude. Listen to me, man to man.
Read between the lines- the lines, man. She's not picking on you becuase its actually fun picking on dummies and midgets, both are actual turn ons.

Athelwulf:

Wow, Xev. Ya should get an award for subtlety.
And you, an Oscar for stalking.

And you, an Oscar for stalking.

And you, a Grammy for . . . No, that'd get me banned. :D

gendanken:
Are you suggesting that my love for Truthseeker is a snide jab at a popular belief, rather than an all-consuming fire that lights my heart and fills my days with joy? You're not a real woman, but a fat old slob living in her parent's basement, jealous of the passion and desire I have to consume the quality man-flesh of this hunky he-god.

Truthseeker, you need to be squashed like a roach. Don't you dare reject Xev's love! Don't you dare be a jerk like the rest of guys!

Why wasn't the thread just moved?

Probably because there's no pansy idiot faggot section.
Porf should really put one in.

Probably because there's no pansy idiot faggot section.
Porf should really put one in.

It's called the Cesspool. It's where all the cool homosexuals hangout.

Don't worry truthseeker. You will get used to their immaturity after a while. They show themselves up and think they are funny when in reality they are an embarressment to themselves. They might see that too when they are drawing their pension. In the mean time (and it is a mean time), it is better to just suffer their ignorance.
Remember they think they own the place. You know how it goes :)

your friend

c20

well this is new, someone calling a moderator unfair for follewing the rules

they are supposed to use their discretion, that may seem biased to some , but they have to draw the line somewhere, get ever it

Well that thread does not seem the be vulgar or instigative, that were my cut off line is for closing threads, Maybe it could have been moved to somewhere. I think Parapsychology might have been a good place for it. But if Xev does not feel it a appropriate subject for philosophy so be it, TruthSeeker why don’t you just start another thread like it in Parapsychology.

I don't think it's the moderators job to shuffle threads around all the time. A poster that has as many posts as Truthseeker, should know what forum is appropriate for his post and post it there himself, not expect Xev to nanny up for him. Posters that post in the wrong forums are either lazy or stupid and deserve to be deleted.

As for banning Xev... as long as Fetus remains standing, she looks a lot like God in comparison... so she stays.

It's not philosophy. The traditional approach of Western philosophy has been to logically analyze problems, questions or states.

"For the sake of discussion, I shall define "spiritual" as everything that is not physical or directly related to logic."
So we have no postulates in science....

Also.... everyone always ask for definition, and I gave it.
Besides, we can always argue wheter there are things that are not physical or not. Just because everything that we know of is physical, doesn't mean there isn't something that is not physical. If you say that, you commit Argumentum ad ignorantiam (http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html#ignorantiam)...... :rolleyes:


This removes it from logic and indeed from the physical itself. Good lord, you're not even discussing a subject.
Not if you try to prove logically that there is something not physical.
But in the thread in particular, the argument was that there is a direct correlation between spiritual activity and good health.


Damn, you got me. I think you're hot, Truthseeker. I grew up in a very deprived environment, so I associate abuse with love.
That explains a lot...



Why wasn't the thread just moved?
Because the moderator is biased.... :rolleyes:

Arditezza,

Thank you for putting me above Xev in evilness, I'm flattered, but facts are that Xev has had more banish, impeachment and complaints polls then I have, though I have been trying to catch up. :D

By the way do you believe we should give special treatment to members just because they have a high post count?

Well that thread does not seem the be vulgar or instigative, that were my cut off line is for closing threads, Maybe it could have been moved to somewhere. I think Parapsychology might have been a good place for it. But if Xev does not feel it a appropriate subject for philosophy so be it, TruthSeeker why don’t you just start another thread like it in Parapsychology.
Is there such a forum? :eek:

And that was not parapsychology...... :rolleyes:

You were questioning the nature of spirituality, I think that could fit in parapsychology.

I don't think it's the moderators job to shuffle threads around all the time. A poster that has as many posts as Truthseeker, should know what forum is appropriate for his post and post it there himself, not expect Xev to nanny up for him. Posters that post in the wrong forums are either lazy or stupid and deserve to be deleted.
It wasn't the wrong forums.... :rolleyes:



As for banning Xev... as long as Fetus remains standing, she looks a lot like God in comparison... so she stays.
WellCooked is by very far much better than Xev..... :rolleyes:



You were questioning the nature of spirituality, I think that could fit in parapsychology.
What do you define as parapsychology?
Besides, as long as there is an argument, it can go to the philosophy section....

Surely you could put it in philosophy but Xev does not want it there, so try somewhere else.

Arditezza,

Thank you for putting me above Xev in evilness, I'm flattered, but facts are that Xev has had more banish, impeachment and complaints polls then I have, though I have been trying to catch up. :D

By the way do you believe we should give special treatment to members just because they have a high post count?

Xev has been around a lot longer than you have. So to compare the amount of "ban" threads started about her is really stupid. It took only a week or so for yours to begin. While I don't like Xev as a moderator, she's a much better moderator, more fair, less shady, far more intelligent and exceedingly more interesting than you are.

I was not putting you above her, I think that you are worse than 99% of the posters here and that you are nowhere near being worthy of a moderator position. People feel sorry for you, and that is why you get the minimal things you do get. People stick up for you, because they assume you are too stupid to stick up for yourself and aren't armed with the tools needed to make it through life. They are probably right. Before you count your chickens, you should really take a look at just how close your ban thread was and learn from it.

Ok then, I’m flatter by your disgust of me. :)

Oh...! I didn't realize there was another Fetus moderator.... :D



Surely you could put it in philosophy but Xev does not want it there, so try somewhere else.
So just because she doesn't want it, I can't do it?
Sounds like totalitarianism.... :rolleyes:

Basically it is. You can try arguing with Xev or a supermod to have it reopened and/or moved, but the chances of you getting Xev impeached and the next mod reopening it are even less likely. I don't understand why Xev close it but there is not much that you or even I could do about it.

Yeah.... I guess we don't have a democracy here..... :rolleyes:
Altough most people seem confortable with this totalitarianism.... :rolleyes:

No we don't have a democracy here, it’s a psuedo-democratic dictatorship.
Its not that people are happy about it its just that this forum in general is not bad, and is one of the most lenient of them all. So you can live with the flaws or find another forum.

Oh...! So we should just accept everything and conform to that? :rolleyes: :D ;)

No please complain all you want, just don't expect change.

Well.... at least I try to change and not just sit down and let others rule the world and do whatever they want...

No please complain all you want, just don't expect change.
What? You're giving him license to keep this up? (gods, please make it stop!)

So denying free speech is the same as "following the rules".......


Who says you have freedom of speech? This is a messageboard, not a constitutional democracy.


Oh...! So we should just accept everything and conform to that?

Submit, bitch.


That explains a lot...

No shit. My parents sold me to a lesbian couple when I was fourteen, they chained me to a radiator and wouldn't let me loose except to dress me up in skimpy outfits and sing for their industrial-metal band. I lost my virginity to the bassist, but they found out and had him castrated. It was really sad.

You are the first person to ever tell me about love. So I wrote this poem for you:

Truthseeker, Truthseeker, he is really neat
What a whiny faggot I would like to grind his meat
Oh how his pallid skin inspires me I would like to write a song
About the gorgeous boy to whom my heart it does belong

Damn, you got me. I think you're hot, Truthseeker. I grew up in a very deprived environment, so I associate abuse with love. Thus I mock you, thinking that I am displaying my affection. Although I taunt you for being weak, I *really* just want to ride your juicy meatstick.


Are you suggesting that my love for Truthseeker is a snide jab at a popular belief, rather than an all-consuming fire that lights my heart and fills my days with joy? You're not a real woman, but a fat old slob living in her parent's basement, jealous of the passion and desire I have to consume the quality man-flesh of this hunky he-god.


Truthseeker, Truthseeker, he is really neat
What a whiny faggot I would like to grind his meat
Oh how his pallid skin inspires me I would like to write a song
About the gorgeous boy to whom my heart it does belong
Christ woman you just made my stomach contents take a trip to my mouth..

This is like the Twilight Zone.

As for banning Xev... as long as Fetus remains standing, she looks a lot like God in comparison... so she stays.
Definitely the Twilight Zone.


This thread. Why the heck she closed it!? Like.... can she just close whichever thread she doesn't like!? Is that fair at all for other people?
Well you're still around and we still have to put up with you, so where's the fairness in that? And yes she can close the thread if it does not belong in the philosophy section. Moderator's do have that power.


Besides, we can always argue wheter there are things that are not physical or not. Just because everything that we know of is physical, doesn't mean there isn't something that is not physical. If you say that, you commit Argumentum ad ignorantiam......
You are the last, the absolutely last person alive or dead on this Earth and Universe to be accusing others of presenting arguments from ignorance.


But in the thread in particular, the argument was that there is a direct correlation between spiritual activity and good health.
Really? And yet even the Pope is sounding and looking like a vegetable.


Yeah.... I guess we don't have a democracy here.....
Altough most people seem confortable with this totalitarianism....
Idiot.

Truthseeker, Truthseeker, he is really neat
What a whiny faggot I would like to grind his meat
Oh how his pallid skin inspires me I would like to write a song
About the gorgeous boy to whom my heart it does belong

lol, homecooked or stolen ?

Except that Kid, for him I have prepared a poem…

For longer then I can remember
I have been looking for someone like you
Some one with a head like yours
And a torso to
Birds sing
And your going to pay!
The end

Here some meat covered in barbecue sauce!!! *Throws hot meat at person of affections, meat begins to burn off flesh*
Tak; Invader Zim: season 1, episdoe18: Tak the Hideous New Girl


Sound familiar?

WellCooked is by very far much better than Xev.....

Are you being sarcastic?
If not, you've confirmed that you're a panzy idiot faggot.

Wow so many people think I'm that bad, I should be more like Xev for better comparison: I should say things like "Submit, bitch." and give off profane virtual slaps to the head rudely declaring my authority over you.

Who says you have freedom of speech? This is a messageboard, not a constitutional democracy.
How sweet....


Submit, bitch.
Submit what?


You are the first person to ever tell me about love. So I wrote this poem for you:

Truthseeker, Truthseeker, he is really neat
What a whiny faggot I would like to grind his meat
Oh how his pallid skin inspires me I would like to write a song
About the gorgeous boy to whom my heart it does belong
If I was really the first person to tell you about love, I wouldn't be surprised that you actually like me. But...! I wouldn't go into the psychology behind that. Whatever...



Well you're still around and we still have to put up with you, so where's the fairness in that? And yes she can close the thread if it does not belong in the philosophy section. Moderator's do have that power.
Yes, they do have the power to close threads with a bunch of useless insults, but they should not close threads just because they don't like it or because it is on the wrong place. They should just move it if it is on the wrong place. Otherwise, that's throwing away free speech!


You are the last, the absolutely last person alive or dead on this Earth and Universe to be accusing others of presenting arguments from ignorance.
You don't even know what the argument is about....!


Really? And yet even the Pope is sounding and looking like a vegetable.
Maybe that is related to his age.......?
Cum hoc ergo propter hoc.... (http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html#cumhoc)


Idiot.
Really? What a great argument.... :rolleyes:
Argumentum ad hominem (http://www.infidels.org/news/atheism/logic.html#hominem)

Let's see the definition of "idiot"!

"id·i·ot ( P ) Pronunciation Key (d-t)
n.
1. A foolish or stupid person.
2. A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive. "

Huuuuumm.... who is really an "idiot"...?

Well... I guess neither one of us fall under that... ;)



Are you being sarcastic?
If not, you've confirmed that you're a panzy idiot faggot.
I was talking about WCF, no EF.....


And I don't really know EF, so I don't really have an opinion on him/her....

kunax:
Why homecooked of course. Only the best for my beloved.

Truthseeker:

How sweet....

Are you suggesting that sciforums is a constitutional democracy?


Submit what?

An application for a cheap bus pass on the grounds of your being retarded. You'd be approved and the thought of you driving a car scares the hell out of me.


If I was really the first person to tell you about love, I wouldn't be surprised that you actually like me.

I more than like you. I love you. You are my retarded snugglebunny.


But...! I wouldn't go into the psychology behind that. Whatever...

*Sob*
And this is how you repay my devotion! You men are all the same.
I even took time away from watching midget porn to write you that poem. Bastard.

ElectricFetus:

Wow so many people think I'm that bad, I should be more like Xev for better comparison: I should say things like "Submit, bitch." and give off profane virtual slaps to the head rudely declaring my authority over you.

I get most of my ideas watching "Oz" in case you're looking for pointers....

No, Xev all I need it you, that way I look angelic in comparison. :D