World Offensive against US declared at World Social Forum

Thats what I call Jehad by the world against evil.

<iframe src=http://www.chinapost.com.tw/international/..%5Cp_detail.asp?id=76221&GRP=D&onNews= width=700 height=700> </iframe>

Dont worry about the print dialog box.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

indeed.
america is going to have to answer for its belligerant domination of weaker nations very soon, i think.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

I hope they take this opportunity to form US 2.0

I mean United States of Weaker Nations.

 

Log in or Sign up to hide all adverts.

"Mr Danger". Very fitting. Seems the only people for the US way of life are the few who profit from capitializing on weaker peoples of the planet.

 

And what about the cheap fuel from Iraq and Afganistan ? Who is using it, there is blood all over USA in that fuel. U people are in deep shit, U should have wiped out entire muslim civilization to save your way of life, Work half done is not done. Get ready to pay the fine.

U r burning blood of millions of innocent suffering in your cars, U evil American taxpayers.

 

To listen to the local discourse, Darwin would have no street cred in these parts if he didn't unabashedly wear his mommy's panties out in public.

 

Capitalism sucks but what kind of government would you prefer? Communist dictatorship?

 

Better than a Democratic Dictatorship.

No matter what the presidents do the people just helplessly watch as their leaders destroy the country. Presidents have too much power. There should be a facility to raise votes against the evil actions.

 

That would be giving the people too much power, in my opinion. Once the President is sworn in, he will constantly be being checked by the uneducated, uninformed people and popular groups who decide what he's doing is evil. Everything he does will be evil to someone or some group somewhere, and if they have enough members, then the President is effectively powerless.

AmishRakeFight

 

People always bitch about or queen (the dutch one) but I see a great value in having her. Because we have a queen, we do not have a president. Our prime minister doesn't have the same power as a president would have. The queen has some power on paper, but she isn't in a position to abuse it.

Obviously I would rather have no head of state at all. But one man doesn't constitute a revolution.

I still don't see why we would need a head of state. Certainly not in this modern era with technological possibilities unheard of decades ago. We could have a direct democracy with no problem (technology wise).

And the US is just gliding in the wrong direction. From democracy to facism.

 

I am going to sleep for a hundred years, enough talk. Wake me up when WW3 starts

 

why not, isnt that what democracy was all about ?

Who cares what the dogs say, what about the majority ?

Some one is not the majority.

How much should be enough ?

 

http://www.chron.com/cs/CDA/printstory.mpl/nation/3632894

 

Direct democracy, yes; Representative democracy, no. And it just so happens that America is a representative democracy.

What I meant by that was that we can't put out the intelligence briefings to America's citizens (and therefore the world). The President is given certain information collected by the CIA, NSA, and all the other 3-letter acronym Intelligence services that the general public has no business hearing. Even now, the walls have ears. Leaks are rampant among the White House nowadays.

AmishRakeFight

 

America is a Federated Republic.

The States are the "representative democrac"ies.

Hope your student loan was worth it.

 

Clue 1: People don't vote for the Federation's President. People vote for their State's vote for the Federation's President.

The Electoral College-thing, you know.

No?

 

Obviously.

 

Let me guess: Progressiveness is make-believe in high gear.

Just another faith-based industry.

 

But what if an evil man gives a clean chit to the society and becomes the most powerful man in the universe.