With responses like this I don't believe he has the maturity to be one.

Up your ass it sounds like. Bush did not want a 9.11 commission, he wouldn't testify under oath, he prevented formal investigation into the lies he told to bring us to war. Bush did not fund the war under the budget but under supplemental appropriations.

SpiderGoat is a moderator because has is both arachnoid and mammalian at the same time therefore he is the only member to have crossed the plane of transspecial existence.....he also is armed with the force of hobbit.

he also is armed with the force of hobbit.

So you are saying he is harmless?

I have deleted the offending material and warned me about the rules.

Note that I still reserve the right to express my personal opinions, but I will try to be as fair as possible in moderating.

If maturity is a requirement for mods, does that make us wiser than the plebes?:p

Nobody told me maturity was a requirement. :o

YOure not a mod aswell are you Sam?:eek:
This is getting too much like too many chiefs and not enough plebiens.

YOure not a mod aswell are you Sam?
This is getting too much like too many chiefs and not enough plebiens.
Guilty.:o

http://www.sciforums.com/showgroups.php

Nobody told me maturity was a requirement.

Me neither. Me talk pretty now?:(

If maturity is a requirement for mods, does that make us wiser than the plebes?:p
:eek:

I didn't get the "maturity" memo.:(

Who said Moderators can't have feelings, the segment was also un offensive to a particular person. so wtf?

as long as he isnt deleting all posts which expressa viewpoint contradictory to his own, then what is the problem with him expressing his opinion?

spidergoat, is it possible to give you an infraction for you actually giving yourself a warning for posting your 'pinion?

You are not allowed to give warnings or infractions to Moderators.

what a bunch of bullshit that is.

what a bunch of bullshit that is.

you would like a lone nut to give out a handful of infractions to each moderator so that they are all banned?

Which means they can't be unbanned.

you would like a lone nut to give out a handful of infractions to each moderator so that they are all banned?

Which means they can't be unbanned.
Yeah, I see the logic -- moderators now are akin to "da pigs". In SciF's case, cops wearing civilian clothes. So unfair and unreasonable, uh?

Nothing to do with pigs. Monkeys. monkeys monkeys.

The higher the monkey sits in a tree the more you see of his glorious bottom.

you would like a lone nut to give out a handful of infractions to each moderator so that they are all banned?

Which means they can't be unbanned.

but a lone nut can do thart to anyoine else. and wouldnt this behavuiiour be viewed as trolling anyway? which would then be dealyt weith by a super moderator...or next in chain of command.

btw- what info do mods have access to that members do not?

but a lone nut can do thart to anyoine else. and wouldnt this behavuiiour be viewed as trolling anyway? which would then be dealyt weith by a super moderator...or next in chain of command.

btw- what info do mods have access to that members do not?

Why would you want to stop at supermods? Surely you should be able to give them infractions if you desire to give mods infractions. Same for the admins.

Does it matter where you cross the line if the line is crossed. It's crossed or it is not?

Nothing to do with pigs. Monkeys. monkeys monkeys.

The higher the monkey sits in a tree the more you see of his glorious bottom.

Nobody wants to give infractions to monkeys, Spurious. Especially when they're all dressed up in civilian clothes (don't worry about us seeing what we shouldn't - lol). I mean, it would sound silly to say, "hey, here come the monkeys!!" -- you'd think we'd be doing a 1970s retro.

Why would you want to stop at supermods? Surely you should be able to give them infractions if you desire to give mods infractions. Same for the admins.


i cannot see the point in giving an administrator an infraction.

i cannot see the point in giving an administrator an infraction.

What if they call you a ******* ****?

What if they call you a ******* ****?

i would cry.

what does this part (*******) mean?

Imagine something really bad.

Imagine something really bad.

must be euro terminology/ rhynms w\ bucking runt?

If a God, I mean a Mod, gets infractions, will they be banned temporarily? Will their forum be open to rampant abuse during that time?

I'm left wondering how that could be considered insulting, except maybe the "up your ass" bit. And only if you're PC or something.

The vast majority of the snippet looks merely like an opinion you simply didn't like. That's not immaturity on spidergoat's part.

Look, mods want also to participate as themselves -- as posters, hence infractions, like any other poster. Goofyfish is about the only mod who could dodge infractions for his commentary is typically not as poster but as mod moderating.

there should be a "user rating" that the mods have, based on their popularity as a mod.
a lower score would equal less "mod-like" abilities.

there should be a "user rating" that the mods have, based on their popularity as a mod.
a lower score would equal less "mod-like" abilities.'

You want politicians for mods?


:( :( :(

i want them to make their subforums more attractive, instead of some of them pursuing personal agendas.

oh joy...an opportunity to be constructive on sciforums.

What would make the biology, or any subforum more attractive?

shut up.

SpiderGoat is a moderator because has is both arachnoid and mammalian at the same time therefore he is the only member to have crossed the plane of transspecial existence.....he also is armed with the force of hobbit.

This is by far the awesome-est post on this thread.

What would make the biology, or any subforum more attractive?
Full frontal nudity.

Only to Genji.

Only to Genji.

You don't find pregnant women attractive? I bet Bells' tits are swollen with milk.
And I hear sam's got a nice rack.