|
|
View Full Version : Why are straight women more daring than straight men?????
sargentlard 03-18-03, 03:43 PM [B]Why is it that straight women are a lot more willing to take part in Lesbien encounters than straight men are in gay encounters. Some women don't even have to be drunk to try the experience of kissing another women yet men could be loaded and still somehow realize they are about a touch a dude?. Is it because of the gender differences? since girls were always allowed to talk about their feelings and be open and while boys are it's kinda looked down upon (especially by the dads...not all dads but you know who you are). Any thoughts???????????
Could it be that women are so hot even straight women can't deny their awesome hotness ( hotness?? is that even a word?).
P.S. why doesn't my signature work?:D :rolleyes: :bugeye: :eek: :m: :cool: :o
sargentlard 03-18-03, 06:32 PM i guess it could be...wait...that's too...eww....ok never mind...but do you other guys think.
*stRgrL* 03-18-03, 06:55 PM Well generally its looked down upon when 2 guys are together. Yet its every mans fantasy to see 2 women together. They know men like it and so they are more prone to try it.
Clarentavious 03-18-03, 07:15 PM I don't think he means while a man or men are observing, I think he means in general.
It could be that women find qualities in other women that they desire in a relationship, or sex, that they can't find (or have trouble finding) in men. For example, one woman might like people, or want a mate who is passionate, and not aggressive. If she meets 10 guys, and finds only 1 who is more to her tastes, but meets 10 women, and finds 9 that she likes, she might get the idea women suit her better.
In this way, maybe some women might ignore the fact that this person is of the same gender, and look at them for who they are, and accept them in a relationship (or for sex) as a human being, regardless of gender because they like who they are.
Women generally aren't as sexually intent as men, maybe they don't find touching another woman's body as repulsive as men find touching another man's body (like a woman might say "well it is not my preference to love on another woman's vulva or breasts, but it would only make me slightly uncomfortable" While a guy might say "Whoa, touching another guy's penis would be totally gruesome and a horrifying experience!") Maybe they aren't bothered to the same extent.
You have to pay or be a moderator for signatures :p
Bebelina 03-18-03, 07:39 PM Women are generally more openminded, that's all.
sargentlard 03-18-03, 09:10 PM Well quite a lot more mature answers than i expected. Thank you guys for bothering to answer.
Dr Lou Natic 03-18-03, 11:34 PM Women are universally more attractive, seriously , thats it.
Nothing to do with open mindedness or whats taboo.
Girls are hot and even straight girls can see that, a dude is a dude to a dude, they are all butt ugly and disgusting.
Women have some freakish desire to have children and this is masked with a physical attraction to men.
Women actually are beautiful(some of them) as opposed to sperm donors.
Yet its every mans fantasy to see 2 women together. They know men like it and so they are more prone to try it.
Luckily, not all men are stupid pigs and not all women are stupid twats. So no, it's not every man's fantasy.
Basically, men are more disturbed by the prospect of submitting to another man than women are.
spuriousmonkey 03-19-03, 08:01 AM maybe more heterosexual men are more gay than you think. It is a well established phenomena that heterosexual men seek out transexual prostitutes (a man turned into a woman) and afterwards claim that they are not gay. Although the pay a premium if the transexual hasn't lost the male genitalia yet.
this leads me to believe that there is possibly more gay heterosexual men than common belief would suggest. This is a phenomenum especially widespread in a society that doesn't accept homosexuality.
SwedishFish 03-19-03, 09:27 AM I've heard that no one is completely straight or completely gay. That would fit in nicely with my threshold theory.
It probably is a result of what's acceptible for each sex. When I was in Spain we saw women friends and men friends holding each other's hands or with their arms around each other's waists. Our guide told us friends do that and they also kiss each other on the cheeks or lips.
Americans are so puritanical and homophobic. I see it being instilled in young boys when their fathers tell them not to do something cause it will make them a "sissy". They're told over and over again not to do this, not to do that. Girls are allowed to hug and hold hands with their girlfriends. They don't develop a repulsion for other girls' bodies. I have no problem touching the body of another women or having one touch mine even though I'm not attracted to them. I wouldn't mind kissing a women either but only in the company of women (No men!) so there goes that waterless theory.
Neville 03-19-03, 10:34 AM This is true. My mother once told me that it was more natural for two women to sleep together i.e. to sleep together: in the same bed not to 'get it on', than for two men. It seems true for society too: I have been graced with the company of two nice girls kissing and having tongue fun (they were encouraged, even pressured slightly, by my friend though :D ). I think it's because women are allowed to be weak and two women together is ultimate weakness (if you know what I mean) whereas men are supposed to be strong and it just doesn't work. I can't really explain what I mean but I think you should be able to follow it :D . Women have some freakish desire to have children and this is masked with a physical attraction to men. Thank you Dr. Lou! I was going to start a thread on this. All women want is our seed (imo). They don't give a shit about us! :mad: but back to the discussion. Luckily, not all men are stupid pigs and not all women are stupid twats. So no, it's not every man's fantasy. *gobsmacked* lol :D Basically, men are more disturbed by the prospect of submitting to another man than women are. Spot on!I've heard that no one is completely straight or completely gay. That would fit in nicely with my threshold theory. What's your threshold theory?
I don't think anyone is completely gay or straight. There are two halves to the brain and most children usually accept part of each of their parents personality's as they grow. Part from the female and part from the male. I would say that the part from the male figure is usually more negative i.e. telling the child what not to do rather than encouraging them when they do do something that is 'right'.
Vortexx 03-19-03, 12:56 PM Well, beside the cultural homophobia, I guess that females just look/smell too damn good and make it a lot easier than to tap some guys hairy ass.
If you ask me what i find sexy, the first thing that comes to mind is a voloptuous female with ultrasmooth silky snowhite skin, but being a bodybuilder, you can't help but to develope some appreciation for male eastetics (a la frank zane in my view) as well, especially when the package comes in a caramel complextion skintone and with clear blue-grey eyes, I might consider making an exception....
And than there is the hybrids.... While most trannies IMO look worse than michael jackson and janet reno combined, there are a few pearl in the mud that I find terribly exciting. I wouldn't say NO to Camilla de Castro for example....
SwedishFish 03-19-03, 02:48 PM *disclaimer: i have absolutely no scientific evidence nor have i even considered the topic in depth.*
i think it's a possibility that a person's level of sexuality can be likened to height, with multi-loci. this assumes that sexuality is genetic which it may not be.
sargentlard 03-19-03, 05:41 PM Women are way way way too hot for even other women to ignore........i was right all along...........*scared at the thought of being harshly disproven*.......
creamsoda 03-26-03, 12:04 PM I read somewhere that all females are 15% lesbo.
That explains why girls can hug eahcother, and give little kisses on the cheek to tehir best friend. However, usually, men's hormones are so owerful (unless they're gay) that they don't even think about guys in a friendly...friendly way. Guys are more competitive than women, usually.
Also, women are more open minded than men, it's just the way things are. It's not bad, because men can focus on details, which make them good artists and sports directors. That's why we see GUYS working for disney.
men can also be artists too, don't get me wrong.
I don't know the answer to that question, and I've wondered about it.
I myself don't mind kissing a guy or being kissed by one. Sometimes on the cheek, sometimes on the lips. I don't think it is gay.
Kissing can be sexual, but it isn't necessarily sexual. I mean, you kissed your mom right? To me a kiss is simply a sign of affection. If a girl, even though she isn't my girlfriend but just a friend, can kiss me goodbye or to show affection, why can't a guy? I do kiss my friends that don't care about such things. :) And I don't care whether the guy is gay or straight. It makes no difference to me.
creamsoda 03-27-03, 11:49 AM Oh, that is the sweetest thing I have ever heard Jerrek! As for me, my entire family's homophobic, actually OVERLY homophobic. If they see a guy, amybe give a hug to another guy, my mom's like "turn away hunny." It's sTUPID!
*grin* That is rather common I guess. When I kiss or hug a girl in public, few people take notice. But when I kiss or hug a guy in public, people stare. [Much like they (and I confess, me too) stare when two girls kiss in public. *sigh*]
sargentlard 03-27-03, 08:09 PM Ok i'll admit that two girls kissing is very very tempting...but it's amazing how easily they can kiss and hug each other in suspicious ways without ever caring of what people think...i think that's cool ...really cool. Whatever kiss and hug whoever you feel like: girl or guy...and have fun doing it (groping and copping a feel optional...though preffered:D )
/me fondles sargentlard inappropiately.
sargentlard 03-27-03, 08:56 PM oh la la...le mone cheri....grey poupon.....moulan rouge.....
|