stu_uk
02-23-05, 05:06 AM
If an unstoppable force met an imovable object, what would happen?
|
|
View Full Version : What would happen? stu_uk 02-23-05, 05:06 AM If an unstoppable force met an imovable object, what would happen? Ophiolite 02-23-05, 05:37 AM The blind would see, the lame would walk, and England would win the Ashes. duendy 02-23-05, 05:57 AM If an unstoppable force met an imovable object, what would happen? the reason why that old chestnut seems paradoxically unexpalinable is because it is wholly mental abstract and has no actual reality. for example, the can be no object which is 'im-moveable' for all is change--haven't you noticed..hehe and unstoppably force also is wrong fro things both stop and start, and inbetween, and have ye heard of quanta? stu_uk 02-24-05, 06:26 AM The blind would see, the lame would walk, and England would win the Ashes. Such an Englishman's attitude... Cricket is after all, a representaion of all that the british institution hold dear. jennyRater 02-24-05, 06:36 AM If both 'unstoppable' + 'imovable' were real, absolute... tthem colliding would release the biggest shock in hostory - an INFINITE shock that would destroy all the rest of the world. Even the whole universe. glaucon 02-24-05, 07:26 AM The point is moot: this world does not tolerate absolutes. Dr Lou Natic 02-24-05, 07:50 AM The world would spin in whatever direction the unstoppable force was travelling, but the immovable object wouldn't actually move from where it sat on the ground. England would never win the ashes, that's ridiculous. DeeCee 02-25-05, 08:52 AM Easy peasy. The unstoppable stops and the immovable moves. And if that can happen I'm sure the ashes can come home. Dee Cee spidergoat 02-25-05, 11:44 AM The excess energy would be released as a burst of radiation. Of course, no object is immovable, and no force is unstoppable, that would mean the radiation burst would have infinite energy, and vaporize everything (presumably including the immovable object). ComputerPsi 02-26-05, 05:37 PM The unstoppable force would keep doing whatever it does, without stopping, and the imovable object would keep on being not movable. Simple :) Though... this would only be possible if there was an unstoppable force, and an imovable object. :p geodesic 02-26-05, 07:40 PM The unstoppable object would 'tunnel' through the classically forbidden region. :p Closet Philosopher 02-26-05, 08:22 PM The unstoppable object would move around the other object? It's impossible in the real world. I had to look up the word Ashes to figure out exactly what it was, dammit. geodesic 02-26-05, 09:39 PM The unstoppable object would move around the other object? It's impossible in the real world....unlike this whole situation? Anyway, I was referring to quantum tunneling, a real world phenomen. jennyRater 02-27-05, 05:20 AM you mean it' d just jump to the other side of the imovable object + carry on the same way? geodesic 02-27-05, 05:39 AM Essentially, yes. But I was joking. *Note to Self* No more QM jokes jennyRater 02-27-05, 05:46 AM This whole thread's kind of a joke realy - as glaucon said this world does not tolerate absolutes Chairman_meow 02-28-05, 03:17 AM semantics, gotta love to hate them. jennyRater 02-28-05, 01:44 PM I supose semantics change over time howevr much we try to preserve language - THERES an unstoppable force. SoLiDUS 02-28-05, 03:13 PM If an unstoppable force met an imovable object, what would happen? The Matrix would crash. Roman 02-28-05, 04:54 PM What's the next step in this thread? Insults? Yeah, your mom would crash. goofyfish 02-28-05, 04:58 PM The thread getting closed is the next step. ;) |