|
View Full Version : What's the big deal with N. Korea's nuke, since they are not Islamic fanatics?
Hue_Hare 10-12-06, 05:37 AM I am not Blair/Howard/Bush's biggest fan, but some of their issues makes sense especially with the war against Islamic terrorism, or against radical Muslims' ideology in general, which all normal people can grasp.
Which is why I fully understand the danger coming from the mad man in Iran if he has nuclear weapons.
But what is the big deal with N. Korea? I don't think they have an expansionism trend (as Islamists do).
G. F. Schleebenhorst 10-12-06, 07:11 AM Who is more belligerent? The US and Israel or North Korea and Iran?
Who has more nuclear weapons? The US and Isarel or North Korea and Iran?
Ask yourself those questions before you start calling people madmen.
spuriousmonkey 10-12-06, 07:26 AM The actions of the 'mad man' in Iran are driven by American foreign policy. As everybody should know Iran has been 'shafted' by the USA many times in the past. Read for instance the general modern history in wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran#Safavid_Empire.2C_Shi.27a_Islam_and_Modern_Ir an
Currently it seems as if the foreign policy of the USA is geared towards alienation from the rest of the world and towards the elicitation of radical responses of certain nations. Needless to say one could this describe as the actions of a mad man, or mad men. What you have now in Iran is the result of our own foreign policy. A mad policy.
Fraggle Rocker 10-12-06, 08:55 AM I am not Blair/Howard/Bush's biggest fan, but some of their issues makes sense especially with the war against Islamic terrorism, or against radical Muslims' ideology in general, which all normal people can grasp. Which is why I fully understand the danger coming from the mad man in Iran if he has nuclear weapons. But what is the big deal with N. Korea? I don't think they have an expansionism trend (as Islamists do).The sociopathic fringe of Islamic fundamentalism has taken over the headlines, but we still hate communists.
Besides, KJI has clearly identified America as his mortal enemy. Not South Korea or Japan. Not Israel, India, Taiwan or an African population. Those missiles are aimed at us
G. F. Schleebenhorst 10-12-06, 09:02 AM Are you sure yours weren't aimed at them first?
spuriousmonkey 10-12-06, 09:17 AM Those missiles are aimed at us
Are they Fraggle?
Does North Korea really have intercontinental missiles?
Communist Hamster 10-12-06, 09:55 AM I recall reading in the Times that NK regards Japan as a greater enemy, possibly because they are closer and their history.
lixluke 10-12-06, 10:03 AM I am not Blair/Howard/Bush's biggest fan, but some of their issues makes sense especially with the war against Islamic terrorism, or against radical Muslims' ideology in general, which all normal people can grasp.
Which is why I fully understand the danger coming from the mad man in Iran if he has nuclear weapons.
But what is the big deal with N. Korea? I don't think they have an expansionism trend (as Islamists do).
Korea does not have any missles aimed at America.
Don't listen to proamerican wacknuts.
GF and Spurious are right. You are out of line for your depiction of Islamic radicals. These arab nuts are the result of the AOF. (America, GB, Israel Axis of Evil). The real terrorist is America.
1. Sadam is dominating the people of Iraq.
2. America's solution: Go to Iraq and kill everybody in site.
3. Don't mind me while I lay down a few oil pipelines.
There are no such thing as military threats to the AOF. All of America's actions are purely for business interests. We create the threat, so we can go in there, and establish tyranical profiteering. We are not protecting business interest as much as we are creating financial opportunities for plutocratic vultures.
America's interest in N.Korea's nuclear power is limited. We do not do anything unless it is profitable to the rich that conrol the earth. America's interest is in enslaving the Korean population to be vacuum cleaners to suck up their own resources for the sake of the expanding lifestyle of the abominably rich. Just like we did in Iraq.
Sorry to break it to you, but there is no danger.
At least not for America. There is however danger upon whoever America sees and wants. I want my precioussss.
Jaster Mereel 10-12-06, 09:19 PM Korea does not have any missles aimed at America.
Don't listen to proamerican wacknuts.
GF and Spurious are right. You are out of line for your depiction of Islamic radicals. These arab nuts are the result of the AOF. (America, GB, Israel Axis of Evil). The real terrorist is America.
1. Sadam is dominating the people of Iraq.
2. America's solution: Go to Iraq and kill everybody in site.
3. Don't mind me while I lay down a few oil pipelines.
There are no such thing as military threats to the AOF. All of America's actions are purely for business interests. We create the threat, so we can go in there, and establish tyranical profiteering. We are not protecting business interest as much as we are creating financial opportunities for plutocratic vultures.
America's interest in N.Korea's nuclear power is limited. We do not do anything unless it is profitable to the rich that conrol the earth. America's interest is in enslaving the Korean population to be vacuum cleaners to suck up their own resources for the sake of the expanding lifestyle of the abominably rich. Just like we did in Iraq.
Sorry to break it to you, but there is no danger.
At least not for America. There is however danger upon whoever America sees and wants. I want my precioussss.
What does AOF stand for?
Yeah. I thought we were in a world war against Islamofascism. :cool:
baumgarten 10-12-06, 10:32 PM What does AOF stand for?
AOF is an acronym for America, Israel, Great Britain Axis of Evil (AIGBAE). Get a brain.
AOF is an acronym for America, Israel, Great Britain Axis of Evil (AIGBAE). Get a brain.:confused: An acronym is abbreviation. AOF is not the acronym for America/Israel/GB
baumgarten 10-12-06, 10:35 PM :confused: An acronym is abbreviation. AOF is not the acronym for America/Israel/GB
Your post is irrelevant. I already know what an acronym is. Get lost, bum!
Your post is irrelevant. I already know what an acronym is. Get lost, bum!:cool:
Your post is irrelevant. I already know what an acronym is. Get lost, bum!What does AOF stand for?
Who is more belligerent? The US and Israel or North Korea and Iran?
Who has more nuclear weapons? The US and Isarel or North Korea and Iran?
Ask yourself those questions before you start calling people madmen.
Who cares what you think, until you move to NoKo or Iran and then tell us from there what bastids we all really are -- risking your personal future on an unpopular philosophy worth dying for?
Just another pedestrian hack.
baumgarten 10-12-06, 10:40 PM What does AOF stand for?
I don't really know. Axis Of Fantasy, maybe?
Fraggle Rocker 10-12-06, 10:52 PM Does North Korea really have intercontinental missiles?Well... They sure thought they did. But that recent test was pretty embarrassing. It was so bad they're lucky it didn't backfire and hit Russia or China by accident. :)Are you sure yours weren't aimed at them first?Back in the Cold War, I'm sure we had ICBM's pointed at every communist country. But we wouldn't have hit North Korea with nukes, we wouldn't have taken the chance of pissing off China with the fallout.
spuriousmonkey 10-13-06, 03:07 AM 1. Apparently north korea is not a threat to the USA.
2. Where are your nukes aimed at now?
Hue_Hare 10-13-06, 06:25 AM I am quite surprised by the anti Israel bigotted poster, everyone can understand that little suffering Israel is an island in a sea of hatred & ready to kill Islamic nations waiting only to wipe them off the map.
Hue_Hare 10-22-06, 08:39 AM 1. Apparently north korea is not a threat to the USA.
2. Where are your nukes aimed at now?US' or any other western nukes are in responsible hands.
G. F. Schleebenhorst 10-23-06, 04:58 PM Hue Hare:
Who is the only country to ever have used a nuclear weapon against human beings?
|