View Full Version : What is the best BitTorrent Client?


alexb123
09-27-06, 11:36 AM
I am using BitComet and its good but I wondered if there was better?

RubiksMaster
09-27-06, 12:18 PM
I don't know. I use Azureus, but many people say it's a resource hog.

lixluke
09-27-06, 12:57 PM
Azureus

imaplanck.
09-27-06, 01:12 PM
You are so naughty , buy shit!
Nah seriousy utorrent rocks!

invert_nexus
09-27-06, 01:23 PM
I used to use Azureus, bit as has been said it's a resource hog.
More than just a resource hog. It's a fucking HUGE resource fucking HOG monster.
Throw it away.
Get uTorrent.
Also. Turn off DHT.

Communist Hamster
09-27-06, 02:09 PM
μTorrent is very good, as seems to be the consensus. It is much better than the "official" (?) bittorrent client.

redarmy11
09-27-06, 02:18 PM
Bit Tornado (http://www.bittornado.com/)

It's fast, it's flirty, it's fun.

Basically, you open it; you download whatever non-copyrighted, public domain data you want to download (eg fascinating eBooks and the like - not MP3s or anything, cough, cough); and then you close it.

None of these fancy 'queues' or 'multiple torrent support' nonsense. It just does exactly what it says on the tin, and does it quicker than any other client I've tried (and I think I've tried them all).

spuriousmonkey
09-27-06, 02:36 PM
I can't think of anything illegal to download.

redarmy11
09-27-06, 02:46 PM
I can't think of anything illegal to download.
Are you sure you're Dutch?

sderenzi
09-27-06, 02:53 PM
I have extensive dealings with Bit Torrent clients. Among those I've used I found BitComet to be the most to my liking, however it seems there are some issues with it that have caused certain Torrent sites to prevent its use. Therefore in its absence I went to uTorrent.

After having used uTorrent for a good long while now I can say with certainty that it is the most effective, non-intrusive, likable program. I used Azureus for awhile but it was pointless. Way, way to many options, slow and clumsy, it basically stunk in my opinion. So here is my suggestion:

1. BitComet
2. uTorrent
3. Bit Tornado (I've found it was somewhat slow, but also it acted odd at times)
4. Bit Torrent (original client)

Yea yea, the original client isn't spiffy but it'll get the job done, besides that how can anyone even be certain it's not as fast as the others out there, anyone here tried :-P

In any event Azureus is a no, no.

Also don't download music, buy it using iTunes like I am. It's easier, you get songs that were all encoded using the same bitrate, and you are assured they'll be no skips.

So in effect iTunes is good for music, I own 250 songs now :-)

Torrents are good for testing out software you may wanna buy but which has no trial version available.

Also Torrents are good if you wanna download Anime from Japan that otherwise would never get here, fans subtitle it and then upload it. Although this is boring to me now because I hate to read!

John99
09-27-06, 04:22 PM
Are you sure you're Dutch?


:) I was thinking that same thing.

Fafnir665
09-27-06, 06:05 PM
I am using BitComet and its good but I wondered if there was better?


Your Mom.

Neildo
09-28-06, 09:42 PM
Yeah, another vote for uTorrent.

- N

RubiksMaster
09-28-06, 09:58 PM
Everybody always complains, and says not to use Azureus, but honestly, I didn't have any problems with it. Maybe those people just didn't have beefy enough systems to run it "properly."

kazakhan
09-28-06, 10:11 PM
I use uTorrent on XP and qTorrent on linux although qTorrent hasn't been working lately I'm hoping an upgrade will sort it out...
Everybody always complains, and says not to use Azureus, but honestly, I didn't have any problems with it. Maybe those people just didn't have beefy enough systems to run it "properly."
You shouldn't need a beefy system to run a bittorrent client properly.

invert_nexus
09-28-06, 10:15 PM
Who wants to devote 100 megs of Ram to a bittorrent client? That's ridiculous even if you have ram to spare. What's Azureus doing that is so special that it needs so much ram?

I forget if it actually ever bogged my system down. I think I did run into problems on occasion when I had a lot of applications open. But usually it did just fine. But, I don't want bittorrent eating up so much ram.

I have uTorrent running right now and it is using 8 megs of ram.
That's more like it.

Stryder
09-28-06, 11:28 PM
Azureus isn't just acting as a Bittorrent client, it also uses Java. Java back in the day before better resources was known to be a hog, in fact it still is in some instances.
Azureus just contains alot of pluginability that the other standard clients don't have (and don't necessarily need)

It's also very "graphical" which involves calling Java to poll alot of times to keep the data accurate, you can increase resource by lowering the poll period.

DNA100
09-29-06, 02:15 AM
i use bittoranado.
it's easy to use.


Are there better ones?Are there faster ones? :confused:

Stryder
09-29-06, 08:23 AM
Speed is dependant on a few things:

1: The amount of resources allocated (The Less CPU time the slower information is going to cache to RAM then write to drive)

2: The type of hardware in use (Obviously a RAID array is going to be better than a normal harddrive considering the number of Read/Writes that occur durring a torrent)

3: The type of Operating System (Win XP SP2 limited the number of TCP connections to 30, there are hacks to readjust it back to the original 50, however I think Linux can handle far more connections)

4: The speed of your connection (It's not just the speed of your download, but the upload too)

5: How your torrent client deals with ratios, leaching etc. (Some start slow and speed up, others attempt to have a 1:1 ratio so no matter if you can download at 10Mbps, you'll still be regulated at how quickly you can upload that file)

Lastly, Network Latency, namely are you just running the Torrent while you are away from the computer or are you running other programs online with the Torrent in the background. If so performance will be lower.

Voodoo Child
10-01-06, 03:28 AM
Shareaza. At the moment, I have 4 downloads and it is using 7 meg of RAM. It also has edonkey, gnutella and gnutella2. And looks nice.
http://www.shareaza.com/

Avatar
10-01-06, 07:43 AM
I'm using the standart BitTorrent client.
Azureus is too heavy to my taste.

Any good advices on other Linux BitTorrent clients?

Vega
10-01-06, 08:46 AM
Hey i've been using azureus so far and it works better than utorrent!
I don't why but it may be because i'm on a wireless network or something!

invert_nexus
10-01-06, 08:53 AM
Define 'better'.

lixluke
10-31-06, 01:03 PM
I have now swtiched to Utorrent.
I found a method for increasing spead about 12 fold.
Trying to figure out if there is a way to make go even faster.

For the longest it was taking me FOREVER to download stuff. I adjusted some settings, and now things come in 12 times faster. What once roughly 2 days, now takes about 4hrs.

I still don't understand how this works. I just started typing in thousands in preferences menu. I still don't understand what any of it means. I tried to do a search online.

Does anybody know what all this means, and how to mximize the speed of the downloads, and minimize or even cancel uploads? There has to be some way to cheat the client to cancel all uploads, and maximize downloads alot.

alexb123
10-31-06, 01:04 PM
Ive just switch to BitSpirit and I really like it. I can see my download rates on an always on top bar. Its a complex client but I am getting by.

Xerxes
10-31-06, 01:55 PM
ctorrent for linux (you can use it with screen), and utorrent for windows. Nowadays I mostly use newsgroups though :D

lixluke
10-31-06, 02:55 PM
How can I learn more about news groups?

Nikelodeon
10-31-06, 03:04 PM
So......is anyone downloading anything legal?

alexb123
10-31-06, 03:20 PM
So......is anyone downloading anything legal?

I think I downloaded a trailer once but it was an accident.

sderenzi
10-31-06, 03:56 PM
Newsgroups can burn in hell, they all suck. In any event uTorrent seems to work the best for me, the problem is you really need a good router in order to torrent anything half descently. I had a cheap 60 dollar one that got me an average of like 40 kbs. When I went out an bought a netgear for 120 it went up to 300 kbs on a good seed, and like 90 on a bad LOL

lixluke
10-31-06, 04:16 PM
I have a netgear, although I do not know how to configure utorrent for anything. I have been downloading stuff for a long time successfull even though utorrent symbol at the bottom shows firewall blocking. All the downloads are yellow and never green.

lixluke
10-31-06, 04:20 PM
I'm having a problem as of now. It only maxes up to 350-400 kbps which is the best I can get it to. But the majority of the time, it stays at 70-100 kbps. Is there a reason for this? It only shoots up occasionally, but mostly stays in that low range. I would ideally like it to stay in the 350-400 range, and if possible move on beyond that indefinitely.

phonetic
11-01-06, 10:48 AM
It depends on the torrent, seeds, peers, etc.. but.. you're not connectable.

You need to forward the port utorrent uses in your router.
www.portforward.com will tell you how.
Also, if you're using a software firewall, you'll need to forward the port in that too. You'll need to check microsoft's firewall is disabled/has the port opened (if you're hell bent on using it). Use a port somewhere between 30000 and 51000.

In utorrent - go to options -> preferences -> connection (i think, from memory) and choose your desired port number.

It might be worth trying encryption on and off (it's off as standard). Depending on your ISP, they may prioritise certain types of traffic. Encryption can get around this sometimes... Although if you're in the US, chances are it's not an issue.

Absane
11-01-06, 11:27 AM
I don't know. I use Azureus, but many people say it's a resource hog.

Sure is a resource hog. However, I like the program. It gets the job done.

sderenzi
11-01-06, 12:28 PM
You're mad, there are plenty of people that would kill to have a 300-400 kbs rate like us. You're silly :-P

100 kbs even!