In the not so distant future, women may be "farmed" for the purposes of pleasing men, according to Angry Harry, a men's right activist.


if anything, the chances are not so much that women will take over the planet and exterminate the men, but that men will start to 'farm' women for their very own purposes - just like they currently do with cows.

And, quite frankly, unless women in the west get their act together and start supporting men rather than making enemies out of them by supporting divisive feminists who do little more than continually stir up hatred toward them, and who, therefore, also undermine the whole well-being of their very own societies, then they shall surely deserve to be tamed, domesticated and harvested for the good of the planet, and, of course, for the contentment and happiness of the men who dwell upon it!
Source: http://www.angryharry.com/esKirstyWarkGlows.htm




His reasoning?


Listen carefully. Basically, women were designed by Nature to taste good to men when they are hungry; and that, fundamentally, is the end of the matter. The Universe does not seem to have figured out any other long term purpose for them. And even the ancients clearly recognised this by emphasising the important bits of women in their sculptures...

Realistically, women have only got one hope when it comes to having a happy future. They will have to taste good to men. And if they do not do this, then they are toast; because they will have nothing else to offer.

The converse, however, is not true. Men do not have to taste good to women to be of value to them. Without men - nothing. No houses or factories would be built or maintained. No roads would be constructed.

It is men who create, construct, develop, operate and maintain just about everything that represents the progress of humans on this planet.

This all suggests that women are going to have to behave more like women than like men, or they will find themselves heading for a fall.
Source: http://www.angryharry.com/esAreWomenBecomingRedundant.htm






This Scotsman is dead serious. It is not some bizarre form of satire.

Men have clearly outlived their usefulness.

Angry Harry is the new Happeh.

I say we invite him here to share his thoughts on this new philosophy. All in favour?

Hell yeah!

I think he's right, look at this business that women own...escort services!

Gee, thanks for the cookie I now have to explain to the wife, you twit.

smack

Lovebots are the future for men... and women. A lovebot is the perfect partner: it always does as you tell it, its always in the mood when your in the mood, its personality is just as you like it. Be them bioroids or androids love bots are the future.

I still think this guy would be hilarious to invite to the forum. This insanity needs to be heard.

Gee, thanks for the cookie I now have to explain to the wife, you twit.

smack

So sorry, I have a cookie prevention program, adaware and a good anti virus so I never know when a cookie is being installed for they never make it!

I have a wife. She doesn't let me have those things.

I have a wife. She doesn't let me have those things.

Really pussy whipped, huh. :p

This Scotsman is dead serious. It is not some bizarre form of satire.


So? I lot of internet crackpots are deadly serious and firmly believe their own delusional nonsense. That doesn’t make their delusional nonsense any more valid or believable.

Hercules, I think he's commenting on the ludicrousness of the man's claims, and emphasizing its oddness. I don't think he finds it more believable, unless I've been sorely mistaken about the OP.

Hercules, I think he's commenting on the ludicrousness of the man's claims, and emphasizing its oddness.


Yes, that’s also the way I interpreted it. I wasn’t suggesting the poster actually believes the crackpot. My (inconsequential) point was that it’s not at all surprising that a crackpot genuinely believes something that is patently ridiculous and utterly absurd. It’s common. In fact, I suppose a person wouldn’t be a crackpot if they didn’t believe their own nonsense, they would just be a troll.

Men have clearly outlived their usefulness.

Indeed.

AngryHarry has failed to realise that we can simply harvest the sperm of the men on th planet and then start a happy hunting season.:D

This did amuse me though:

if anything, the chances are not so much that women will take over the planet and exterminate the men, but that men will start to 'farm' women for their very own purposes - just like they currently do with cows.

Hmmm... this could give an indication that AngryHarry believes men have sexual relationships with cows. Or he could be going by personal experience. Or he could mean that women could become an alternate food source.. going by his further comments about women being made to be 'tasty'. Or.. well.. I shouldn't go further into this line of commentary. Children do read this forum.:)

Anywho.. His attitude is no different to those who frequent Dick's site, aptly named "Men Are Better Than Women" (http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/). And yes, the man who runs the site is really called Dick (Dick Masterton to be precise). The irony always brings a smile to my face.:)

"if anything, the chances are not so much that women will take over the planet and exterminate the men, but that men will start to 'farm' women for their very own purposes - just like they currently do with cows.

And, quite frankly, unless women in the west get their act together and start supporting men rather than making enemies out of them by supporting divisive feminists who do little more than continually stir up hatred toward them, and who, therefore, also undermine the whole well-being of their very own societies, then they shall surely deserve to be tamed, domesticated and harvested for the good of the planet, and, of course, for the contentment and happiness of the men who dwell upon it!"

this guy clearly had his fantasies run wild...

Yes, that’s also the way I interpreted it. I wasn’t suggesting the poster actually believes the crackpot. My (inconsequential) point was that it’s not at all surprising that a crackpot genuinely believes something that is patently ridiculous and utterly absurd. It’s common. In fact, I suppose a person wouldn’t be a crackpot if they didn’t believe their own nonsense, they would just be a troll.

Apologies. The question is: should be be invited here? I think exposure to the mad might provide a little reflection. Perspective.

*breathes a sigh of relief* Men who haven't got scabs on their knuckles!

If the tables were turned I wouldn't want to think about a future without men. I wish people would see how well we compliment each other. I think if he actually experienced a world with no women he might understand our symbiosis, in much the same way as if there were stores of sperm and only women walking about. *Shudders* Who would put my shelves up? Joke. I love men, I'd hate to live without them. Yeah there's a few gobshites out there, but that's not men, that's ignorance. And we all suffer from that from time-to-time. I say invite him here and I'll show him what a fucking awesome harmony we two genders make.

I do think Angry Harry needs to check into a the local Scottish nuthouse. Kristy Wark as well.

I say invite him here and I'll show him what a fucking awesome harmony we two genders make.

I say invite him here and laugh at him. Is that wrong?

Anyone ever seen the anime vandread? Very relevant to the subject of what society would be like without one sex or the other.

Geoff, Hmmmmm. Nah :)

That stupid cuntsucker. I hope he develops cancer of the colon or something similarly vile.

Indeed.

... hunting season

Really?

We men have outlived our usefulness?

I think the article holds more truth than you are willing to admit. Acording to "thought" and "reason" which you provide absolutely none of, women will be more subject to this "women farm" than any of you are willing to admit.

Sure, manipulate our sperm, and see you live a woman world. What a horrible place to live in if you ask me.

Women had it better than men since the birth of civilizaton. That was because of men, sacraficing themsevles for their wives and kids.

Hmmmmmm?????

Really?

We men have outlived our usefulness?

I think the article holds more truth than you are willing to admit. Acording to "thought" and "reason" which you provide absolutely none of, women will be more subject to this "women farm" than any of you are willing to admit.

Sure, manipulate our sperm, and see you live a woman world. What a horrible place to live in if you ask me.

No, we can't possibly outlive our usefulness. Women need to be admired, and even though a lesbian is capable of admiring another women's beauty, it can't even begin to compare to how much a man does. In short, I am flat out saying that men will always admire women more then women will. We are biologically built for it!

On a side note I see you've joined the dark side...

That stupid cuntsucker. I hope he develops cancer of the colon or something similarly vile.

Hope is next to hopeless.

Men have clearly outlived their usefulness.

I am gonna argue on behave of the Relative Nature of Reality that men are incapable of outliving their usefulness. I will ignore that fact or idea that perhaps all of us are sexless spirits that inhabit the body of a man in one life and that of a women in another and pretend it isn't so. In which case I might add, does this mean you find more use in the comforts of a woman that a man?

as if he is the only man who feels that way. They just arrested a father who kept his own personal sex slave in a cellar. And what about those cult men who are marrying underage girl after underage girl.

Women had it better than men since the birth of civilizaton. That was because of men, sacraficing themsevles for their wives and kids.

Bollocks.

I'd rather die a violent death than spend my life being a hybrid of cook, nurse and breeding machine.

Bollocks.

I'd rather die a violent death than spend my life being a hybrid of cook, nurse and breeding machine.

don't forget "unpaid home cleaner" and "punching bag".

I'd rather die a violent death than spend my life being a hybrid of cook, nurse, and breeding machine.
Does a life of digging in a ditch with a $20,000 annual salary and all the back pain and torn up skin sound like luxury to you? Millions of men have to do that every day.

Does a life of digging in a ditch with a $20,000 annual salary and all the back pain and torn up skin sound like luxury to you? Millions of men have to do that every day.

It sounds preferable to being a hybrid of cook, nurse and breeding machine.

Women had it better than men since the birth of civilizaton. That was because of men, sacraficing themsevles for their wives and kids.

What part of Scotland are you from?

It sounds preferable to being a hybrid of cook, nurse and breeding machine.
More men are in the hospital than women. Men cannot escape selective service. Men must pay up ridiculous court dues to ungrateful, cunnting wives. All of your luxuries around you came from men who had to give their time and labour for your happiness.

What part of Scotland are you from?
I am not Angry Harry. Just another American.

No, we can't possibly outlive our usefulness. Women need to be admired, and even though a lesbian is capable of admiring another women's beauty, it can't even begin to compare to how much a man does. In short, I am flat out saying that men will always admire women more then women will. We are biologically built for it!

On a side note I see you've joined the dark side...

It's funny how we all tell ourselves these stories,-- bells, you, I, about lesbians admiring womens bodies however a man can admire it better; just to get the terrible truth out of our minds which permieates and is caused by some terrible thang.

But no, seriously Jozen Bo, I have not turned to the darkside :p just a mild darksideism if you will.

That's a lie that would never happen my dad they how why would yo even post this that is that will never happen.

Mods lock this thread pls its completely obsurd this would never happen please delete this thread pls

More men are in the hospital than women
Men cannot escape selective service. Men must pay up ridiculous court dues to ungrateful, cunnting (sic). All of your luxuries around you came from men who had to give their time and labour for your happiness.


1. Why are they in the hospital? Because the big nasty women threw napalm at them? Or because they a) (young ones mainly) thought it was really hard and cool to get pissed and pound each other unconscious, or b) because they won't lool after themselves because it's not macho?

2. Amazingly enough I actually agree with you. Either force both men and women to serve or don't make it mandatory.

3. Those men are usually the same ones who refuse to do anything for their kids yet still want the right to see them, have power over them, and start wretched little court battles over whether their son/daughter should be allowed to have his/her nose pierced.

4. Why were women not labouring also? - because they were stuck at home looking after hideous little whining creatures and keeping the place clean!

Why don't you just force salt water into my mouth and be done with it.

I remember a studies that showed that single women are happier then married women, but that married men are happier then single men.

1. Why are they in the hospital? Because the big nasty women threw napalm at them? Or because they a) (young ones mainly) thought it was really hard and cool to get pissed and pound each other unconscious, or b) because they won't lool after themselves because it's not macho?
I would safely say that only 10% are in there from stupid fights to prove honor. All the rest come from the dangerous jobs men have to take, such as coal mining and contruction. Men victims from domestic violence DO exist. Just google Erin Pizzey, a founder of DV shelters for WOMEN.

3. Those men are usually the same ones who refuse to do anything for their kids yet still want the right to see them, have power over them, and start wretched little court battles over whether their son/daughter should be allowed to have his/her nose pierced.
Most dad love their kids. If they did not, why would they marry and copulate with a woman in the first place?

4. Why were women not labouring also? - because they were stuck at home looking after hideous little whining creatures and keeping the place clean!
In the past children could drop dead like flies without all this medicine and overly nutricious food.

Mods lock this thread pls its completely obsurd this would never happen please delete this thread pls

Easy there. It's dumb, no doubt, but sometimes you have to flip the cockroach's rock over before he gets too comfortable.

This would never happen. Its completely inhuman and it would never happen there is no point to this thread it shud be deleted this would never happen

This would never happen. Its completely inhuman and it would never happen there is no point to this thread it shud be deleted this would never happen

Oh God.. it's back.:(

So just because you say it is an impossibility does not mean the prospect or the ridiculousness of it should not be discussed.

What's the point of talking about it it won't happen why would anyone want to talk about this honestly

What's the point of talking about it it won't happen why would anyone want to talk about this honestly

Some people like to talk about dragons making sweet creamy love to cars, let them talk.

It is pointless. Who would discuss what we already see as crackpotism?

rather than inviting to the forum i would rather lock him in a big brother style house with a rabid man hating lesbian feminist type and film the whole thing to post here:p

You never really know. When Jesus first came out, people thought he was a crackpot.

Men have clearly outlived their usefulness.

no the havn't, we will always need sperm, and who makes sperm .......men do!

we need men to make sure the human race is carried on, just like men need women

rather than inviting to the forum i would rather lock him in a big brother style house with a rabid man hating lesbian feminist type and film the whole thing to post here:pHaha, yeah. Normally the 'All men are rapists' types do my fucking head in, but I'd love to set some in him.

I think the dude is responding to the oft repeated "soon women won't need men at all, lolz, men will go extinct and we'll just breed with test tubes, lolz."
What he's saying is, in all reality before that happened men would be enslaving and farming women.
The idea that men could go extinct with women using technology to breed rests on the false premise that men don't ultimately run the world, and that they wouldn't react and take the reins if they were in danger of dieing out.

He's not saying anything that crazy.
If it ever came to anything like the bizarre future people imagine where men are redundant- women can breed without them and have all sorts of devices and cyborgs to do manly duties- and there seemed to be a genuine threat to the future of mandom, males, being in control as they are, would simply tear things back down to the stone age (maybe via conversion to islam), and next time remember not to let women out from under their thumbs.

Even the male feminists that are all cool and excited by the idea of big bad men shaking in their boots over grrrl power would soon change their tune if there was any substance behind the threat. It's silly and fun at the moment, so they're like "yeah men are pigs, those fat cats just want to use women for sex, well not in the future! lolz, am I right ladies? Yeah lets have sex", but if the day of reckoning approached they'd revert to ape like creatures and would forcefully collect a harem of females which they would rape repeatedly between moments of keeping an eye out for rival males and roaring.

What he's saying is, in all reality before that happened men would be enslaving and farming women.
In another column Angry Harry said it is men who need the liberating. He claims women were not oppressed in the past and men were slaves to women via the drug of sex. So maybe the feminists will get what they want. Men of the future may program women to do all the hard work and the men will just sit back and have fun.

Men of the future may program women to do all the hard work and the men will just sit back and have fun.
The future you say?

Cosmictraveler: I think he's right, look at this business that women own...escort services!

And what would you guys do without a decent brothel? Oh yea, dilly the missus. What a waste of good jizzm!

Hold on doesn't the Handmaiden's Tale by Margaret Atwood follow a similar senerio? Its been a long time since I read the book but I think women are farmed out like cows.

What an poser! He stole his idea from a woman.

Heh. Good point.

Here is another masculinist blog on the "women farm" idea:

One would have to consider the question in light of the benefits either sex brings to society at large - and women would be at an extreme disadvantage if their ability to have children no longer counted as one of their assets. Indeed, they would be viewed as smaller, weaker, less robust men that demanded greater health-care and greater geriatric cost. Although a case could be made for retaining some as a backup reproductive capability should our Brave New World go asunder, their future place amongst our number would be far from assured.
Source: http://onemanskingdom.blogspot.com/2008/02/future-without-women.html

Ho man. That's some extraordinary crazy.