2004 is coming soon, so we must help Georges Bush to be elected in 2004! Come on everybody, help us to save private Bush and find a good slogan for his new campaign.

George Walker Bush
Welcome in a new past, "Hi Ha !"


(campaign paid by Iraqi Oil. "Iraqi Oil, the oil of champions".)

Why? He doesn't need saving, he needs a rival to threaten him in 2004. He doesn't have one yet.

Homer Simpson? No, he has to do his show...
Dumb and Dumber? No, it would be too hard to chose the president and the vice-president.

Arghh, it will be hard to find someone that can reach George's level!!! :rolleyes:

No, my point is that however horrible Bush might be, the Democrats currently have no viable rivals. 2004 will be a landslide victory for Bush unless the pathetic Democrats shape up and actually present people who aren't losers.

That's right. I've never heard about any possible chalengers for GWB.

Except for the whore who lives next door. She might charm the American public into voting for her. She does the sweetest strip I've ever seen.

How humiliating would it be for GWB if he lost to a whore?

Aww, well, Davis is *about to* lose to some lame actor.

Much as I dislike Georgie boy, I agree that the democrats don't have any real candidates for the post of President. Another 4 more years of decadence then?

Originally posted by Zero
...Davis is *about to* lose to some lame actor. If you mean Ahh-nold, he is not running.

:m: Peace.

Currently Dean is the most viable democratic option.

He is garning a good bit of support and funding.

Plus he is left enough to provide a clear alternative to bush's christian coalition.

"Four More Years... To Find Those Pesky WMDs"

He'll find those WMDs. Just like he found ObL, Saddam
and whoever it was that was responsible for mailing anthrax.
The only thing he has found, apparently, is Jesus.   :rolleyes:

:m: Peace.

I don't think that I could stand another four years of Bush, rather I think that I would have to have my body cryogenically frozen until the Democrats come back into power.
I like Dean, but I have my doubts that the party and the American public would rally behind such a far left candidate. I like Hilary for Presidant, she would be a good president, and who doesn't want to see Bill Clinton as the first gentleman.

ZERO MASS

I'd like to see the dems nominate Wesley Clark.

This is the kind of reason Bush press conferences are sort of news in themselves. Q: Mr. President, with no opponent, how can you spend $170 million or more on your primary campaign?

THE PRESIDENT: Just watch. (Laughter.) Keep going.

Q: Yes, sir. And with 15 fundraisers scheduled between -- for the summer months, do you worry about the perception that you're unduly attentive to the interests of people who can afford to spend $2,000 to see you?

THE PRESIDENT: Michael, I think American people, now that they've realized I'm going to seek reelection, expect me to seek reelection. They expect me to actually do what candidates do. And so, you're right, I'll be spending some time going out and asking the American people to support me. But most of my time, as I say in my speeches -- as I'm sure you've been bored to tears listening to -- is that there is a time for politics, and that's going to be later on. I've got a lot to do. And I will continue doing my job. And my job will be to work to make America more secure.

Steve asked a question about this al Qaeda possible attack. Every day I am reminded that our nation is still vulnerable. Every day I'm reminded about what 9/11 means to America. That's a lesson, by the way, I'll never forget, the lesson of 9/11, because -- and I remember right after 9/11 saying that this will be a different kind of war, but it's a war, and sometimes there will be action, and sometimes there won't, but we're still threatened. And I see that almost every day, Mike. And therefore, that is a major part of my job.

And the other part of my job that I talked about is the economic security of the American people. And I spend a lot of time on the economy, going out and talking to the American people about the economy, and will continue to do so.

But, no, listen, since I've made the decision to run, of course, I'm going to do what candidates do. And we're having pretty good success, which is -- it's kind of an interesting barometer, early barometer, about the support we're garnering. (Press conference, 7.30.2003 (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/07/20030730-1.html)) A "Hollywood" line, some avoidance, and do you think he's campaigning in the primary because he knows he needs it?

And remember: this is the White House transcript ...

Just think of it with me here. It's astounding when you put the zeroes in:

George Bush is preparing a $170,000,000 primary campaign despite running unopposed in the Republican Party.

And apparently, this is what the American people expect of the American president.

Advice to Mr. Bush: Would you like to secure your re-election without such an absurd campaign expenditure? Stop dicking around in Iraq. Dump everybody who has offered to take responsibility for your WMD lies. Don't make your Marines sit there and watch folks sandbagged onto the beach die. Oh, and on domestic issues ... you could try doing your job and not usurping the Constitution. In fact, George, you've gotta work on that whole "I hate the Constitution" thing. It just doesn't jibe well with that morning in January when you put your hand on a Bible and swore to protect, defend, and uphold the Constitution. I know those words really hurt to have to say, George, but you'll have to say them again if you're re-elected. Oh, and if late polling suggests that you're still losing to the Democratic candidate (or, miracle of miracles, a third-party candidate) you can always fire John Ashcroft. And if that doesn't work, well ... give some more thought to that Constitution-hating thing you've got going on. It's going to be a big problem for you, George.

I know, I know, I know ... I shouldn't be helping. But my President is preparing to spend $170,000,000 on a primary in which he is unopposed.

That number is so offensive that I'm naturally compelled to do anything I can to bring it down.

Just watch.

Oh ... Mr. President ... we will be. At that price tag, I don't know if we'll have a choice. No, no ... not out of moral obligation. But $170,000,000 on an unopposed primary campaign ... that's gonna get so much airtime. Welcome to Georgeworld. You won't be able to escape his face.

Somewhere in the heart of America, a young boy looks up at his mother. "Can I be president someday, Mommy?" he asks.

"No, baby," she says. "We are a working family. You will never be able to afford it."

:m:,
Tiassa :cool:

Dean is who I think is a real threat to Bush why? Because unlike Bush, Dean has a edge in the basic English department. Also in debates Dean will destroy Bush. Dean is human unlike Gore so it's a battle of the titans.

An opponent to face Bush on Bush's own merits would be easy.
The Democratic opponent has to face the; Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld Empire along with its highly paid publicity machine.

Originally posted by tiassa
Somewhere in the heart of America, a young boy looks up at his mother. "Can I be president someday, Mommy?" he asks.

"No, baby," she says. "We are a working family. You will never be able to afford it."Yes, because social mobility is nonexistent in the United States, right?

As odious as it is to socialists like yourself, that assertion is completely false. How about Condolezza Rice? A black woman (omg play the race card!) who clawed herself out of poverty in the deep south, earned herself a Ph.D., and has the ear of the President at every turn?

Yup. No hope for the poor in this country. We're all part of the proletariat.

So you named one token cabinet member.... The majority of poor people in this country remain poor their entire life.

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines02/1225-02.htm

The only way I have seen the Public Relation Office of Bush Inc work is "If you want the ratings Up someone has to go Down"

I just happen to look at the Bush's Approval rating(Time Magazine) for his current term and every time his approval rating fell down between 50-60% there was some decision/Actions which resulted in Human Life. Check the periods right before 9-11, before Iraq, Before The deaths of Saddam's sons ....and the regular rallies are supported by
Yellow
Orange
Red.....(these are supposed to be levels of alerts) which the public relation uses to gather public support

So the only way we can help Bush is to help him find a Country on the map and his team will do the rest....and UK and Australia Media Barons will suppy the icing.

Peace Out :D

bush sucks, i will not support him. he has done nothing worth praising about.

Yes, because social mobility is nonexistent in the United States, right?Wrong. It's an issue of scale.

A 1998 article by the Washington Post notes that Clinton and Dole, combined, spent $232 million on the 1996 campaign, supplemented by $69 million worth of issue ads from the party committees (1). Three-hundred million dollars for the entire '96 election cycle between the two final candidates.

On primaries and the general election, Clinton and Dole spent $232,000,000; the parties spent $69,000,000. Simple addition, of course, equals $301,000,000. Honestly? I repeat myself for the effect of the zeroes.

Remember: two candidates, primary and general elections = $301,000,000

Bush: one candidate, unopposed, primary election = $170,000,000

It almost makes sense, though: dump a ton of money into campaigning while you're unopposed. It makes for a wonderful string of sound-bites and hallelujah choruses for the autumn campaign.

I'm just not sure Bush is accurate in his assertion that the American people expect him to campaign in the primaries to the tune of over half the cost of the 1996 contest finalists' entire campaigns.

But asking any "Joe America" to put together $170,000,000? A 1996 Senate campaign averaged over $3,700,000. I can see "Joe America" pulling that off with a grassroots run. But one-hundred seventy million dollars in the primary? How many Scooby Snacks would that buy?

(1) "Campaign Finance Special Report." Washington Post. September 4, 1998. See - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/campfin/campfin.htm

:m:,
Tiassa :cool: