Adam
01-10-03, 02:40 AM
NO "smoking gun" is required for the United States to attack Iraq, US Secretary of State Colin Powell has said.
More... (http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5821289%255E401,00.html)
The funny parts:
Powell told NBC News today: "The lack of a smoking gun does not mean that there's not one there."
Of course, the lack of evidence also idicates the accusations are baseless.
"If the international community sees that (Iraqi leader) Saddam Hussein is not co-operating in a way that would not allow you to determine the truth of the matter, then he is in violation of the UN resolution (1441)...You don't really have to have a smoking gun."
1) Since when did the US government give a damn about international opinion?
2) ACcording to the UN, Iraq is sticking to the letter of the 1441 agreement.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer also discounted the significance of Blix's statement, saying: "The problem with guns that are hidden is you can't see their smoke ... We know for a fact that there are weapons there."
This utter dweeb loves spewing out ridiculous slogans and headliners, but he never gives facts or rational comments. What he's saying, in effect, is "Nobody can find any evidence to support our accusations, but we have some anyway, and you will have to trust us on that". Right.
More... (http://www.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,4057,5821289%255E401,00.html)
The funny parts:
Powell told NBC News today: "The lack of a smoking gun does not mean that there's not one there."
Of course, the lack of evidence also idicates the accusations are baseless.
"If the international community sees that (Iraqi leader) Saddam Hussein is not co-operating in a way that would not allow you to determine the truth of the matter, then he is in violation of the UN resolution (1441)...You don't really have to have a smoking gun."
1) Since when did the US government give a damn about international opinion?
2) ACcording to the UN, Iraq is sticking to the letter of the 1441 agreement.
White House spokesman Ari Fleischer also discounted the significance of Blix's statement, saying: "The problem with guns that are hidden is you can't see their smoke ... We know for a fact that there are weapons there."
This utter dweeb loves spewing out ridiculous slogans and headliners, but he never gives facts or rational comments. What he's saying, in effect, is "Nobody can find any evidence to support our accusations, but we have some anyway, and you will have to trust us on that". Right.