Joeman
07-11-02, 12:41 PM
In big trouble:
AT&T - heavy debt. In the process of spliting up
Sprint - relatively okay
Worldcom - Chapter 11
Qwest - in big trouble
Level 3 - big pile of debt
Lucent - runnig out of cash and in credit crunch.
(those are just the huge ones in US. There are many many others in US and Europe. 200 telecom filed chapter 11 in 2001.)
Survivor:
Verizon - will survive. kicking ass in wireless
SBC - merged with baby bells to survive
BellSouth - kicking ass in DSL
Well, the reason this is significant is because our latest economic boom is a direct result of telecom reform act of 94. Thousands of startups formed over night. It simulated other sectors like IT industry, semiconductors, software, and even the old economy which all provided businesses to the booming telecom sector.
As the result of that, all the telecom carriers punched each other's face blue under intense competition. Now they all have boat loads of debt and bad credit ratings. I don't think they are even capable of taking us to 3G.
If you think the economy is bouncing back, don't count on it.
So now, what is next? Governmentize the telecom industry? I think that makes a lot of sense. This telecom calamity is very similar to the problems resulted from energy de-regulation in California. Some basic services should never have been privatized. In California the energy price quintapled because people have to pay for competiting infrastrutures. It doesn't make sense having multiple sets of redundant infrastrutures running around. Telecom de-regulation did some good things. Internet revolution would not have happened this quickly without telecom de-regulation. People still have to look for dates the old fashion way.(:D j/k) We would not have the big economic boom in the 90's. The problem is we might have mortaged our future growth because of that. The companies have taken on huge credit card bill and they will have to spend many many years to pay it off. Until they do so, the GPD and job growth will be sluggish and the next wave of technological revolution will be delayed.
Side Note: This is why I insist our economic woes have nothing to do with Bush.
AT&T - heavy debt. In the process of spliting up
Sprint - relatively okay
Worldcom - Chapter 11
Qwest - in big trouble
Level 3 - big pile of debt
Lucent - runnig out of cash and in credit crunch.
(those are just the huge ones in US. There are many many others in US and Europe. 200 telecom filed chapter 11 in 2001.)
Survivor:
Verizon - will survive. kicking ass in wireless
SBC - merged with baby bells to survive
BellSouth - kicking ass in DSL
Well, the reason this is significant is because our latest economic boom is a direct result of telecom reform act of 94. Thousands of startups formed over night. It simulated other sectors like IT industry, semiconductors, software, and even the old economy which all provided businesses to the booming telecom sector.
As the result of that, all the telecom carriers punched each other's face blue under intense competition. Now they all have boat loads of debt and bad credit ratings. I don't think they are even capable of taking us to 3G.
If you think the economy is bouncing back, don't count on it.
So now, what is next? Governmentize the telecom industry? I think that makes a lot of sense. This telecom calamity is very similar to the problems resulted from energy de-regulation in California. Some basic services should never have been privatized. In California the energy price quintapled because people have to pay for competiting infrastrutures. It doesn't make sense having multiple sets of redundant infrastrutures running around. Telecom de-regulation did some good things. Internet revolution would not have happened this quickly without telecom de-regulation. People still have to look for dates the old fashion way.(:D j/k) We would not have the big economic boom in the 90's. The problem is we might have mortaged our future growth because of that. The companies have taken on huge credit card bill and they will have to spend many many years to pay it off. Until they do so, the GPD and job growth will be sluggish and the next wave of technological revolution will be delayed.
Side Note: This is why I insist our economic woes have nothing to do with Bush.