Note: I'm sorry if the mods find this offensive, but I'm really ticked.



You stated you seen those exact photos before, you just don’t come across photos’ like that.

No... I never stated "exact photos," ever.

This is what I wrote.

I swear that I've seen pornography that looks just like a number of those photographs.

You know why? ... because there are girls giving blow-jobs and girls getting screwed from behind in those photos.

Almost all porn includes those very same 'features,' usually repetitively... oh, but I forget, you've never looked at any porn, since you're a paragon of virtue.

... you admitted yourself you get off rape porn.

Wrong, prick. That was never stated, not once.

... why are you even trying to defend yourself?

You're making me furious. That's why.

Haha! You simply can't get over it can you. If you were innocent, this defense would simply not be necessary. If you were innocent then you shouldn’t even be bothering with me, or my position. Obviously me and Tiassa’s characterization of you is correct. Live with you dysfunction, the first thing to rehabilitation is admitting it. The more you rationalize your position the more obvious it gets that you have a guilty conscience, so I beg you to continue to defend your dysfunction, its fun to see you squirm. You're making me furious. That's why. I don't know why, aren't I a lying scumbag? Obviously not... I bid you adieu.

This thread is out of my jurisdiction, so I can't do anything except warn everyone to stay out of it until the appropriate action is taken. Flame threads have no place on sciforums.

I agree, this thread should be deleted. I already resigned from it.

I shot down your moronic accusation, and yet you persist, unwilling even to apologize.

Whatever, you sob...

Undecided should be banned.
Thats just fucked up. Of course rappa is going to be irritated by that shit.
Anyone could tell that was porn. Making sordid accusations about someone because they point out that fact is fucking low.

would it be very inapropriate of me to ask what this thread is meant to be a continuation of?

This thread:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=35585&page=9&pp=5

It is currently closed and I deleted most of the posts.

Undecided:
Haha! You simply can't get over it can you. If you were innocent, this defense would simply not be necessary. If you were innocent then you shouldn’t even be bothering with me, or my position. Obviously me and Tiassa’s characterization of you is correct.

You're uncouth and a liar.

Porn is rampant on the net, but that was rape was it not? You don't just get pop-up ads showing it.

I have.
One can stumble across the most unpleasant things while looking for relatively innocuous erotica.

For that matter, most heterosexual pornography is somewhat disturbing to those of purely egalitarian tastes.

No he must have looked for pornography which was obviously rape in nature.

Incorrect again.
I should think your projecting.

I very highly doubt that it was in that context. Remember he said he had seen that very same porn before. He must have searched for it, intent, motive, all we are missing is the actus reus… hmmm.

I presume you'll quote him?

I am sorry but obviously that man has issues and you concur by even addressing the problem.

No, I'm defending him because you're slurring him and he's one of the smartest and most charming members of this site.

Is it my business? Of course, because those dysfunctions have an affect on society at large. Rape is not something that we can simply let happen, if we can prevent it we should, shouldn’t we?

Attempting to throw the white mantle of virtue over yourself fails when you're a filthy liar, Undecided.

Who knows, it starts out as watching porn and transgresses into something more. Rapistcini over there proved to me and others that he has serious issues.

I think you are a disgusting, petty, libellous weakling who cannot take the man down on his arguments and are thus forced to accuse him of psycho-sexual unpleasantness.

What Rappaccini consumes is none of your business in any case. Even if he is
an avid reader of Peter Sotos and the Marquis de Sade, it would remain PRIVATE and between him and his conscience.

You know, Undecided, that inner voice that makes you hesitant to make nasty assertions about people whom you simply envy?

Your fascination with Rappaccini's sexual tastes is, while we are on the subject, rather deviant itself. Why should you care?
What provokes this intense interest in another man's fantasy life, Undecided?

Obviously me and Tiassa’s characterization of you is correctAll I'm going to say is it's amazing what happens when I put other people's tools in my own hands.

Ye gads ... I'm mad enough to want to rumble with Xev, Rap and Undecided have the gloves off ... see what you start (http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=35587), Rappaccini?

Very well ... you all have my apologies for that shot at Rappaccini. I promise you, I wasn't in a bad mood about this when I started.

Yeah, right, and I'm Kilgore Trout, the famous science-fiction writer.

Kilgore Trout was not famous! Sure, he's Vonnegut's alter-ego, but he is not famous in the books. He's a washed up has-been. Not famous one bit.

Oh yes, and I can flame with the best of them. This whole day is starting to piss me off, the way everyone is acting. Pull y'alls heads out of your asses already.

This thread:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=35585&page=9&pp=5

It is currently closed and I deleted most of the posts.


I see. Good job.
Whose jurisdiction is this? Surely this conversation is giving certain mods a bad name, no?




Go Xev! (in this case...)

Would you people go away and let me get back to mocking Undecided?

Kilgore Trout was not famous!

That was the point... ;)

Xev, you should just discountinue. This is all getting out of control. I admit that I had a chuckle over the whole Undecided/Rappa flame war, but it's over with now. I closed the thread; it's dead.

If they want Undecided banned then they should start a thread in SFOG, not one in ATM that's suppose to entice people to flame more.

Rappa, okay. I thought so. Just making sure.

no one wants to ban their toy :)

... it's amazing what happens when I put other people's tools in my own hands.

Well, it was never really about what you wrote. I knew you were emultating my one commentary, the one to which you linked.

It was understandable.



Does this (http://sciforums.com/showthread.php?p=569054#post569054) please you?

I know, I know. Really ... I didn't mean for it to blow up this big. I suppose I owe you a specific apology, too: I just wanted to razz you a little bit, not start a new revolution.

Oh, well. Starting tomorrow, I get to make nicotine withdrawal my excuse.

and with that last statment from Tiassa, can these threads be locked and forgotten about?

and with that last statment from jadedflower, can these threads...

With this last statement... eh, Rappa?

No! with this final statement, by Yogi Berra!

You got to be careful if you don't know where you're going, because you might not get there.


... and before you question me about that, remember!

A witty saying proves nothing.
~Voltaire~