http://www.citypages.com/databank/24/1182/article11417.asp

http://citypages.com/imagebank/articles/24_1182/24_1182a11417_m.jpg

"Bring em On!"

No investigation, no inquiry, no impeachment. This president is bigger than god.
I just hope come November, 2004 the masses awaken to this monster.


Paul Wolfowitz, the Bushmen's leading intellectual light, has long been rabid on the subject of Iraq. He reportedly told Vanity Fair writer Sam Tanenhaus off the record that he believes Saddam was connected not only to bin Laden and 9/11, but the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

Oh no, more whining from liberals. :rolleyes:
A bunch who never mattered.

And inwhich pigeon-hole do you belong?

Originally posted by Zero
Oh no, more whining from liberals. :rolleyes:
A bunch who never mattered.

Thats rights so when the nation and the world gets messed up don't start blaming us: we had nothing to do with it.

Thats rights so when the nation and the world gets messed up don't start blaming us: we had nothing to do with it.

opinions have no value

actions do

that’s right and since we cannot make any actions we have no "value" (well logically that is not a true statement) therefore we cannot be blamed for actions we did not do.

Paul Wolfowitz, the Bushmen's leading intellectual light, has long been rabid on the subject of Iraq. He reportedly told Vanity Fair writer Sam Tanenhaus off the record that he believes Saddam was connected not only to bin Laden and 9/11, but the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

I feel good in knowing US poitical matters have seeped into the fashion magazines and it's writers.

He lied....big deal...nothing new........

Like the action to kill 7000-12000 Innocent Iraqis, destroy Iraqi infrastructure, about 1 million dead Iraqi's due to sanctions, a massive increase in cancer rates among children in S.Iraq (DUI), the installation of a genocidal maniac in 1979. Surely actions do speak louder than words. :D

Depleted Uranium is most likely not the cause of increased cancer rates in Iraq, it much more likely that is was all that burning oil.

and again that’s something the conservatives did not the liberals.

Well WCF that is up to dispute the Italians in the Kosovo war got sick men b/c of DUI from A-10's they claimed, so it is up to who u talk too.

what were they doing licking the rounds? :bugeye:

Like the action to kill 7000-12000 Innocent Iraqis, destroy Iraqi infrastructure, about 1 million dead Iraqi's due to sanctions, a massive increase in cancer rates among children in S.Iraq (DUI), the installation of a genocidal maniac in 1979. Surely actions do speak louder than words

I agree. But most of that stuff wasn't actually Bush's fault. Just thought I'd point that out...

I just hope come November, 2004 the masses awaken to this monster.

That will never happen. Not in your lifetime, not in mine.

I feel good in knowing US poitical matters have seeped into the fashion magazines and it's writers.

He lied....big deal...nothing new........

This is a poor statement.

No investigation, no inquiry, no impeachment. This president is bigger than god.
I just hope come November, 2004 the masses awaken to this monster.

Unfortunately those who vote by examining the issues are few. Most vote with respect to the 'pigeon-hole' they are placed in or place themselves in. The only way Bush loses is if more democrats vote, and not through changing already set minds.

Originally posted by sargentlard


He lied....big deal...nothing new........

I would say the same, but to put things into prespective, the government was dragged to a complete stop to investigate clinton's PERSONAL life.

Bravo.

He lied....big deal...nothing new........

Presidents are more than just leaders and government officials. They're supposed to help the people make the right connections. Like terrorism comes from the middle east, and abroad. Not terrorism comes just specifically from Iraq. I remember the media talking again and again about how much of a terrorist state Iraq is. But now I ask this: what about Syria, North Korea, and the terrorist that are right here in America?

I wonder so much about North Korea to. I remember awhile back another member said something along the lines of "And the coming war with Korea is all about rice."

What war? What actions? What have we done in North Korea? I guess it's up to the UN on that one? But I'd like to point out that If North Korea is a UN matter than Iraq is to.

President Bush has consistently made the wrong connections for the American people. Especially with that horrid anti-drug campaign. So to quote Bill Marh: "Because we all know that on September 11th we were attacked by 13 guys named Horhey." While Im speaking about drugs I might as well go ahead and say it: Post-taliban Afghanistan now has the highest opium production, ever. Let the good times roll.

And finally, Pollux is right. Most of the sanctions in place were not of President Bush's making.

I would say the same, but to put things into prespective, the government was dragged to a complete stop to investigate clinton's PERSONAL life.

True. But who wants to hear about Bush's personal life?

CounslerCoffee:
And finally, Pollux is right. Most of the sanctions in place were not of President Bush's making.
True. But who wants to hear about Bush's personal life?

Presidents come and go, but flawed leaders and policy makers continue to push flawed foreign policy. Bush Sr. is responisble for sanctions.

Oh, so you say Mr. Clinton's personal life was to be detailed at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars; but not Bush?

The only other conclusion can be reached is Bush family does not want something revealed. We know what that is, no?

Oh, so you say Mr. Clinton's personal life was to be detailed at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars; but not Bush?


¿Habla usted inglés?

Did I not just agree with SargentLard? Did I not? Please, read the post that I made. I said that SargentLard was right when I said the word "True". What followed was a question and an insult to the leader.

Examine:

Me:
But who wants to hear about Bush's personal life?

Personally I didn't care when Clinton got blown by Monica, so why should I care that Bush got Mustache rides from Saddam?

Both Clinton and Bush are, in a philosophical sense, liberals.

Clinton had numerous political problems in office, but had powerful friends cover them up.

Bush has a different "method."

I wouldn't vote for either of those miscegenated liars. (Note: Both have partial Jewish ancestry, as does H.R. Clinton).

http://www.theologyweb.com/forum/images/smilies/stop.gif wooo before I call you a fascist neo-nazis what do you mean by "(Note: Both have partial Jewish ancestry, as does H.R. Clinton)."

Don't mind Sodomy, we all know that there is something wrong with him and we'll leave it at that.

Here is a big Bush lie:
"We were threatened enough by Saddam Hussein and Iraq to launch a war on that country"

I'm not dumb, Iraq was a threat, every country that has the potential to harm the USA is a "threat", but does that give us the right to destroy our enemies before they attack us?
North Korea has bombs; they have killed more people through starvation than Saddam did through torture, the have the power to create WMD.
The fact of the matter is that the war on Iraq was a lie, a big one. It hurt the USA more than it helped it, what oil rich Iraq is supposed to be is another Kuwait, but that is not a reason to take military intelligence away from destroying the remnants of Al-Qaida and Osama Bin Laden.

Hey, but we have a chance to not elect Mr. Bush yet again in a year, lets go Democrats!

ZERO MASS