View Full Version : Universe Expansion is Accelerating


wet1
03-22-02, 03:45 PM
Universe Expansion is Accelerating, UK and Australian Researchers Say

By Royal Astronomical Society
posted: 11:17 am ET
20 March 2002

A team of UK and Australian astronomers has discovered new, independent evidence that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. Their findings have just appeared in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Three years ago, two teams of astronomers rocked the scientific world by finding evidence that the expansion of the universe is accelerating rather than slowing down as had generally been expected because of the gravitational attraction between the matter within it. According to these groups, the brightnesses of supernovae (massive exploding stars) they observed in remote galaxies require a universe filled with a strange kind of dark energy that causes it to accelerate increasingly faster into the infinite future.
Einstein - who called it 'the cosmological constant' - first postulated the concept of dark energy. But Einstein later referred to this idea as his greater scientific blunder since it spoilt the simplicity and elegance of his General Theory of Relativity. Since then, the cosmological constant has had a controversial history. The great Cambridge astronomer Sir Arthur Stanley Eddington was convinced of its existence, arguing that the cosmological constant distinguished between the vast size of the observable universe and the tiny scales of subatomic particles. But to most theoretical physicists the cosmological constant has seemed utterly mysterious and unnecessary, and many have been reluctant to accept the results of the supernovae teams.
Now, a team of 27 astronomers led by Professor George Efstathiou of the University of Cambridge has published strong evidence for the existence of dark energy using an entirely different technique. They used the clustering pattern of 250,000 galaxies in a large volume of the universe surveyed with the Anglo-Australian Telescope at Siding Spring in New South Wales, Australia. By comparing the structure in the universe now, some 15 billion years after the Big Bang, with structure observed in the cosmic microwave background radiation, which preserved information about what the universe was like when it was only 300,000 years old, the Anglo-Australian team could apply a simple geometrical test to elucidate the composition of the universe.
Their results show that the universe is full of dark energy, completely consistent with the earlier supernovae results. "It seems that Einstein did not make a blunder after all -- dark energy appears to exist and to dominate over more conventional types of matter," Efstathiou said. "An explanation of the dark energy may involve String Theory, extra dimensions or even what happened before the Big Bang. At present nobody knows. The ball is now firmly in the theorists court."

For article see:
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/astronomy/universe_expansion_020320.html

apolo
03-24-02, 10:00 PM
I don't beleive the universe is expanding.
I rather agree with the theory of HOYLE, NARLIKAR and others that the universe is infinite in time and space, and that matter and energy is constantly beeing recycled. Matter to energy and back to matter.
The CBR is not an echo of the B.B. it is merely the background temperature of a static universe.
I might add Mr. Hubble never beleived the redshift had anything to do with velocity. only with linear distance.
See "The observational aproach to cosmology" by E. Hubble 1937

Signed APOLO

(Q)
03-26-02, 12:38 PM
apolo

I don't beleive the universe is expanding.
I rather agree with the theory of HOYLE, NARLIKAR and others that the universe is infinite in time and space, and that matter and energy is constantly beeing recycled.

Have you ever heard of Olber's Paradox? Essentially one asks the question, "Why is the night sky dark?" This may seem a trivial sort of question, however this one simple querie has led to the inference that the universe is indeed expanding and that the universe, or at least the stars and galaxies contained within, have a finite age.

If the Universe was infinite in time and space, then the stars would fill the Universe uniformly, in other words, a star would exist in ever single point of the sky and the night sky would be as bright as day or as bright as the surface of the sun.

Don H
03-27-02, 06:00 AM
Distances are measured in terms other than red shift. They are increasing uniformaly.

A prosaic explanation for accleration could be that relative to our position in the universe more matter now lies outside our position in the universe relative to the original center.

thed
03-27-02, 08:36 AM
Current thought is that the observable Universe is a small fraction of the whole. As our light horizon expands with time we will see more. Also, it is now a given that there is no center to the Universe. The Big Bang creates spacetime as well as energy/mass which then expands. So, every point in spacetime is the center. This is to be consistent with the axiom that there are no special observors in the Universe, no absolute frame of reference.