Tiassa
04-03-04, 06:30 AM
Let us take a moment to rub the noses of the French in it. The IHT is listed by Google News as being from France:
• International Herald Tribune. "U.S. takes opposite tack from France in head scarf debate." April 2, 2004. See http://www.iht.com/articles/513140.html
• The Hindu. "US Justice Dept. to intervene in head scarf case." April 1, 2004. See http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/holnus/003200404011225.htm
• CNN.com. "U.S. to defend Muslim girl wearing scarf in school." March 30, 2004. See http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/03/30/us.school.headscarves/
• CBS News. "Oklahoma: Head Scarf Battleground." March 31, 2004. See http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/31/national/main609526.shtm
• Reuters. "Justice Dept. Supports Muslim Girl's Headscarf." March 30, 2004. See http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=4705024
"No student should be forced to choose between following her faith and enjoying the benefits of a public education."
-U.S. Assistant Attorney General R. Alexander Acosta-
The United States Department of Justice has announced that it will intervene in the ongoing controversy in Muskogee, Oklahoma, where school officials suspended 11 year-old Nashala Hearn for the crime of wearing the hijab.
Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Alex Acosta said last week that the government would support Hearn's effort against the Muskogee Public School District. The Justice Department has filed a complaint against the school district, and also a motion to intervene in private litigation between the family and the school board. Quotes from around the news:• D.D. Hayes, a lawyer for the school district, said Muskogee was trying to follow the law as laid out by U.S. Department of Education guidelines. Hayes said the guidelines state a person does not have the right to wear religious attire to school.
"We don't have an ax to grind. If the judge tells us we are wrong, we will comply. But I think we will prevail," he said in an interview. (Reuters)
• The Council on American-Islamic Relations -- which has often been critical of the Bush administration's policies -- praised the government's support in the case.
"This moves comes in a time when the Muslim community feels like they are being singled out and their civil rights threatened," a statement from the group said.
"The news also sends out a message to the international community, especially some European countries where the wearing of the head scarf is being banned, that America will defend its citizens' religious freedoms." (CNN)
• "It's also good for other religious minorities -- for the Jewish community and the Sikh community . . . On the international level, it sends messages to European countries such as the French who have banned hijabs in schools that our laws and interpretation of religious freedom are protected here." (IHT)
• The complaint seeks to force the school to change its dress code policy to "ensure there is no discrimination on the basis of religion" . . . .
. . . . "We believe we're interpreting it right and apparently the federal government says different," Muskogee schools Superintendent Eldon Gleichman said. "I guess we'll let a judge determine it."
The complaint alleges the school district violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution by applying dress codes in an inconsistent and discriminatory manner. (CBS)
• "We certainly respect local school systems' authority to set dress standards, and otherwise regulate their students, but such rules cannot come at the cost of constitutional liberties. Religious discrimination has no place in American schools," [Acosta] said. (The Hindu)Commentary: I caught this going by first in the ticker and then as a passing headline report on the cable news, smoked a bowl to celebrate, and then promptly forgot about it.
While there's no real mystery about that, it did strike me that there's not much talk going on about it. After all, this is America, and France be damned! Actually, Socialists, war opposition, hijab ban--two out of three ain't bad, but I'm not Meatloaf.
By any interpretation of the First Amendment that leaves it remotely intact, the US government is obliged to its position in general, and we should not doubt that the Bush Administration needs a little bit of good PR. Would they have gotten involved at this point or simply waited for it to become a federal case? That's all beside the point now, since should anyone have asked--and some did in press conferences--the US government has only one route to go in this case, and that is the route they have chosen.
So yes, I'll give a nod to fed for getting into this one at this stage, but we should remember that this isn't a uniquely courageous stand for the Bush administration, but merely part of the job.
These are the United States of America. This is the way it goes. People are free to learn other ideas, but we can't force them at the stake of their consciences.
Raise a glass ... this is Freedom in the 21st century.
• International Herald Tribune. "U.S. takes opposite tack from France in head scarf debate." April 2, 2004. See http://www.iht.com/articles/513140.html
• The Hindu. "US Justice Dept. to intervene in head scarf case." April 1, 2004. See http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/holnus/003200404011225.htm
• CNN.com. "U.S. to defend Muslim girl wearing scarf in school." March 30, 2004. See http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/03/30/us.school.headscarves/
• CBS News. "Oklahoma: Head Scarf Battleground." March 31, 2004. See http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/03/31/national/main609526.shtm
• Reuters. "Justice Dept. Supports Muslim Girl's Headscarf." March 30, 2004. See http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=4705024
"No student should be forced to choose between following her faith and enjoying the benefits of a public education."
-U.S. Assistant Attorney General R. Alexander Acosta-
The United States Department of Justice has announced that it will intervene in the ongoing controversy in Muskogee, Oklahoma, where school officials suspended 11 year-old Nashala Hearn for the crime of wearing the hijab.
Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Alex Acosta said last week that the government would support Hearn's effort against the Muskogee Public School District. The Justice Department has filed a complaint against the school district, and also a motion to intervene in private litigation between the family and the school board. Quotes from around the news:• D.D. Hayes, a lawyer for the school district, said Muskogee was trying to follow the law as laid out by U.S. Department of Education guidelines. Hayes said the guidelines state a person does not have the right to wear religious attire to school.
"We don't have an ax to grind. If the judge tells us we are wrong, we will comply. But I think we will prevail," he said in an interview. (Reuters)
• The Council on American-Islamic Relations -- which has often been critical of the Bush administration's policies -- praised the government's support in the case.
"This moves comes in a time when the Muslim community feels like they are being singled out and their civil rights threatened," a statement from the group said.
"The news also sends out a message to the international community, especially some European countries where the wearing of the head scarf is being banned, that America will defend its citizens' religious freedoms." (CNN)
• "It's also good for other religious minorities -- for the Jewish community and the Sikh community . . . On the international level, it sends messages to European countries such as the French who have banned hijabs in schools that our laws and interpretation of religious freedom are protected here." (IHT)
• The complaint seeks to force the school to change its dress code policy to "ensure there is no discrimination on the basis of religion" . . . .
. . . . "We believe we're interpreting it right and apparently the federal government says different," Muskogee schools Superintendent Eldon Gleichman said. "I guess we'll let a judge determine it."
The complaint alleges the school district violated the equal protection clause of the Constitution by applying dress codes in an inconsistent and discriminatory manner. (CBS)
• "We certainly respect local school systems' authority to set dress standards, and otherwise regulate their students, but such rules cannot come at the cost of constitutional liberties. Religious discrimination has no place in American schools," [Acosta] said. (The Hindu)Commentary: I caught this going by first in the ticker and then as a passing headline report on the cable news, smoked a bowl to celebrate, and then promptly forgot about it.
While there's no real mystery about that, it did strike me that there's not much talk going on about it. After all, this is America, and France be damned! Actually, Socialists, war opposition, hijab ban--two out of three ain't bad, but I'm not Meatloaf.
By any interpretation of the First Amendment that leaves it remotely intact, the US government is obliged to its position in general, and we should not doubt that the Bush Administration needs a little bit of good PR. Would they have gotten involved at this point or simply waited for it to become a federal case? That's all beside the point now, since should anyone have asked--and some did in press conferences--the US government has only one route to go in this case, and that is the route they have chosen.
So yes, I'll give a nod to fed for getting into this one at this stage, but we should remember that this isn't a uniquely courageous stand for the Bush administration, but merely part of the job.
These are the United States of America. This is the way it goes. People are free to learn other ideas, but we can't force them at the stake of their consciences.
Raise a glass ... this is Freedom in the 21st century.