People of the intelligent variety put a high premium on truth and its pursuit. Me personally, I think that truth is contextual and subjective. There comes relief in thinking that the more the confusion, the brighter the truth. So when truth reveals itself in places of obscurity, it is/or seems all the more brighter. It cannot be disputed no matter what the belief system. Truth also has the advantage of coherence. But when coherence is subjective, truth's value is also subjective. Vantage points on the other hand are better. The more perspectives you could see, the more the vantage point. But this also has to do with creativity, which is dependent on upbringing and proclivity. Where there is only truth, there can be no creativity. As it seems, creativity can either destroy or create truth because it is a mixture of chaos and reason. That means that substance and content are subjective. That leaves us with the possibility that what we call "truth" are only images of truth and what we call "lies" are only image of lies.

Hit that up.

People of the intelligent variety put a high premium on truth and its pursuit. Me personally, I think that truth is contextual and subjective. There comes relief in thinking that the more the confusion, the brighter the truth. So when truth reveals itself in places of obscurity, it is/or seems all the more brighter. It cannot be disputed no matter what the belief system. Truth also has the advantage of coherence. But when coherence is subjective, truth's value is also subjective. Vantage points on the other hand are better. The more perspectives you could see, the more the vantage point. But this also has to do with creativity, which is dependent on upbringing and proclivity. Where there is only truth, there can be no creativity. As it seems, creativity can either destroy or create truth. That means that substance and content are subjective. That leaves us with the possibility that what we call "truth" are only images of truth and what we call "lies" are only image of lies.

Hit that up.

truth goes with what judicially sound. As for images...life is this real thing we got and nothing more.

Anyone? Anyone at all?

Anyone? Anyone at all?

stop pretending, that sore comment you made couple of month about my mother still weighs heavily on me.

Alrighty, judicially sound it is.

Each persons truth is based on their perspective. Therefore, the more sound perspectives you can get, the more likely you will have the truth. If 1 man calls you an idiot, ignor him, if 5 people call you an idiot, you better take a look in the mirror.:D

People of the intelligent variety put a high premium on truth and its pursuit. Me personally, I think that truth is contextual and subjective. There comes relief in thinking that the more the confusion, the brighter the truth. So when truth reveals itself in places of obscurity, it is/or seems all the more brighter. It cannot be disputed no matter what the belief system. Truth also has the advantage of coherence. But when coherence is subjective, truth's value is also subjective. Vantage points on the other hand are better. The more perspectives you could see, the more the vantage point. But this also has to do with creativity, which is dependent on upbringing and proclivity. Where there is only truth, there can be no creativity. As it seems, creativity can either destroy or create truth because it is a mixture of chaos and reason. That means that substance and content are subjective. That leaves us with the possibility that what we call "truth" are only images of truth and what we call "lies" are only image of lies.

Hit that up.
The truth is objective, meaning its real or true regardless of any subjective viewpoint, etc...the truth is also unchanging

The actual truth, the true nature of reality is probably very different from modern science