c20H25N3o
10-27-04, 05:05 AM
The whole concept of 'false light' is an interesting one.
I cannot imagine a 'false light' because if it shines it 'is' light and cannot be mistaken for anythig else.
However I can define in terms of words but only when I transpose the word 'light' for 'love'.
I'll provide an example ...
The True Light says ...
Father's, punish your children when they misbehave, if you do not you will ruin the child.
The False Light says ...
Father's, who are you to punish your children when they misbehave? If you touch them you are wicked hypocrites!
Now both claim to be coming from a 'loving perspective' but are quite clearly opposed.
Lets examine this phenomena ...
The true light gives authority to the father of the child. I call it the true light because in truth we know that it is good that kids do what their parents tell them whether it seems fair or not to the child. After all the child's welfare is always paramount and so they ought trust that their parents's are only acting in their best interests. As a parent, I only get cross with my kids when I see that they are doing something that is detrimental to them. If they do not follow my word then I have a duty to keep them in check because I know that the punishment I exact will be proportional with the disobedience. If I didnt exact my own punishment then my child may very well squeeze through the railings on the bridge we are standing on and plunge to their deaths which would not be a fitting lesson for disobeying my word. My child's defiance will cause his death if he is not kept in check.
The false light gives authority to the child and ignores the father's concern for his child. The false light admonishes the father for caring about the welfare of the child and tells the child that their father is wrong for being 'angry' at the disobedience. But we know that unchecked the child will seek his own way through those railings and plunge to their deaths.
So the true light struggles with patience until frustration becomes unbearable and then it acts with a force that punishes that which it loves in the interest of that which it loves whereas the false light struggles with nothing and rebukes that which does struggle in the interest of others.
The false light is puffed up. It says "I would NEVER do anything to harm another person because to lay a finger on another human person is evil no matter who they are" whereas the true light says "I will use WHATEVER means at my disposal to protect that which does not know right from wrong because I love them."
The false light seeks the praise of others because of their 'goodness' whereas the true light seeks approval from no-one and just acts in love even if they could themselves be accused of acting violently towards their child.
The true light is honest about its nature. The false light is not it seems.
Discuss!
Thanks
c20
I cannot imagine a 'false light' because if it shines it 'is' light and cannot be mistaken for anythig else.
However I can define in terms of words but only when I transpose the word 'light' for 'love'.
I'll provide an example ...
The True Light says ...
Father's, punish your children when they misbehave, if you do not you will ruin the child.
The False Light says ...
Father's, who are you to punish your children when they misbehave? If you touch them you are wicked hypocrites!
Now both claim to be coming from a 'loving perspective' but are quite clearly opposed.
Lets examine this phenomena ...
The true light gives authority to the father of the child. I call it the true light because in truth we know that it is good that kids do what their parents tell them whether it seems fair or not to the child. After all the child's welfare is always paramount and so they ought trust that their parents's are only acting in their best interests. As a parent, I only get cross with my kids when I see that they are doing something that is detrimental to them. If they do not follow my word then I have a duty to keep them in check because I know that the punishment I exact will be proportional with the disobedience. If I didnt exact my own punishment then my child may very well squeeze through the railings on the bridge we are standing on and plunge to their deaths which would not be a fitting lesson for disobeying my word. My child's defiance will cause his death if he is not kept in check.
The false light gives authority to the child and ignores the father's concern for his child. The false light admonishes the father for caring about the welfare of the child and tells the child that their father is wrong for being 'angry' at the disobedience. But we know that unchecked the child will seek his own way through those railings and plunge to their deaths.
So the true light struggles with patience until frustration becomes unbearable and then it acts with a force that punishes that which it loves in the interest of that which it loves whereas the false light struggles with nothing and rebukes that which does struggle in the interest of others.
The false light is puffed up. It says "I would NEVER do anything to harm another person because to lay a finger on another human person is evil no matter who they are" whereas the true light says "I will use WHATEVER means at my disposal to protect that which does not know right from wrong because I love them."
The false light seeks the praise of others because of their 'goodness' whereas the true light seeks approval from no-one and just acts in love even if they could themselves be accused of acting violently towards their child.
The true light is honest about its nature. The false light is not it seems.
Discuss!
Thanks
c20